Quatermass wrote:
Okay, do you want me to be not so polite? Your calling sartreuse a turd-muncher is a personal attack, and if it weren't for the fact that I am sure you were being facetious, I would have taken action.
Well, I think the most polite thing to do in this instance is to insult chever.

But in all seriousness, I could honestly say that by refusing to phrase your position in a systematic manner, you could come off as rather crude. After all, as greenblue notes, the line between excrement and non-excrement could also be taken as blurry. Not only that, but your statement on the meaning of "freedom of speech" could be taken as a callous dismissal of the philosophical positions of a few members, which seems rude.
As for calling sartresue a turd-muncher, I could also argue that it is technically accurate. If sartresue has ever eaten a "Little Debbie's" snack, she has likely eaten a bunch of bug turd, and most people have had one of those. And if not that, then likely something else. Turd, in some form or variety, is rather easy to consume by accident.
Quote:
This is a warning to you all. You have, at best, limited time. As you have not taken my words seriously, I will warn you this much: come December, I will personally clean house in this forum. You have until then to clean your act up.
Why are you so concerned about taking action in this forum? I am just curious, as you seem to place such emphasis in cleaning house.
Last edited by Awesomelyglorious on 14 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.