Fnord wrote:
The burden of proof for a claim rests solely upon the person or persons asserting said claim
If the person is claiming absolute certainty, yes, as it seems the poster, did, but then, we are making an interpretation of intent, basing it on a post that doesn't provide much argument.
Shiggily's response seem to be much better given the nature of the claim.
By the way, I'll try to remember that exact quote next time someone claims making generatizations about religionists being this and that.

Quote:
Aaronrey must therefore provide evidence to support his claims (a, b, and c). Failure to do so nullifies his claims and renders this entire thread irrelevant.
Irrelevant to whom? The thread IS relevant, because it is in the Politics, Philosophy, and
Religion forum, by that statement it would mean that religious topics should be all irrelevant due to being unable to provide evidence for the existence of God, with discussions related to God, but given the nature of this forum, that statement doesn't seem to hold.
_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?
Last edited by greenblue on 16 Jan 2009, 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.