Page 2 of 5 [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


right?
Of course the punk rock spirit applies to politics! f**k the system! 50%  50%  [ 9 ]
No and it's not even music! It's noise. 22%  22%  [ 4 ]
None of the above... 28%  28%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 18

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

17 Jan 2009, 4:08 pm

It just seems to me that punk-rock is all about rebellion for its own sake. Rebellion for its own sake, just mindless destructive energy, seems pretty stupid.



mixtapebooty
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 381
Location: Richmond, Va

17 Jan 2009, 4:23 pm

Many different political styles of Socialism and Anarchy are represented by the Punk movement. Political application can only be shown through evidence of the lifestyles that people lead. Writings, music, art, and other forms of creative expression influence ideas and perceptions of other people. One of the main goals of Punk is to influence political thought, yes. Does Punk make sense as a political party? No. Are Punk social groups sexist, violent, and corrupt? Yes and No.



protest_the_hero
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Age: 187
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,011

17 Jan 2009, 4:25 pm

slowmutant wrote:
It just seems to me that punk-rock is all about rebellion for its own sake. Rebellion for its own sake, just mindless destructive energy, seems pretty stupid.
Well let me give you a different perspective. I refuse to do drugs or drink alcohol as a personal choice even though most people do. I also refuse to take an interest in fashion even though most people do. Rebellion isn't always selfdestructive. Sacrificing individuality can be far more self destructive than being yourself for example even though the latter would be seen as more rebellious.



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

19 Jan 2009, 7:35 am

slowmutant wrote:
It just seems to me that punk-rock is all about rebellion for its own sake. Rebellion for its own sake, just mindless destructive energy, seems pretty stupid.


Some are, the likes of the sex pistols and New York Dolls were simply nihilistic, others like the ruts, the clash, stiff little fingers had a reasonable go at left wing politics. But here I am showing my age, with regard to so called modern punk bands I dont really know


Now heres a thought to my mind Punk was not just about the music, it was a cultural movement. So can contemporary bands claim the title of punk. Wouldnt that be the same as a band claiming to be hippies when the hippie movement died out in the early 70's


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

19 Jan 2009, 7:48 am

protest_the_hero wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
It just seems to me that punk-rock is all about rebellion for its own sake. Rebellion for its own sake, just mindless destructive energy, seems pretty stupid.
Well let me give you a different perspective. I refuse to do drugs or drink alcohol as a personal choice even though most people do. I also refuse to take an interest in fashion even though most people do. Rebellion isn't always selfdestructive. Sacrificing individuality can be far more self destructive than being yourself for example even though the latter would be seen as more rebellious.


You've made some wise decisions, as far as drugs and booze are concerned. Refusing to take an interest in fashion is certainly your prerogative. I agree that rebellion isn't always self-destructive. Rebellion is more about self-preservation, don't you think?



Magnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,372
Location: Claremont, California

22 Jan 2009, 9:09 pm

slowmutant, Jesus went into the temple and started throwing the tables over and yelling at the people selling animals. That is pretty rebellious. I mean, I think that whole scene can be reenacted to make a pretty good punk rock video. He was definitely a non-conformist.

He also yelled about the tax collectors being sinful. Yelling at the IRS is pretty rebellious, don't you think? He also rebelled against Judaism, the religion of his day.

Rebelliousness is an inevitable trait to any form of political reformation.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

22 Jan 2009, 10:05 pm

Quote:
slowmutant, Jesus went into the temple and started throwing the tables over and yelling at the people selling animals.


He sure did. He got angry just that one time.



NeantHumain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,837
Location: St. Louis, Missouri

22 Jan 2009, 10:28 pm

protest_the_hero wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
Why the need for a post on this? punk rock songs are replete with political subject matter.
well some hic disagreed! there's an amazing quote by picasso randomly placed in the lyrics booklet 4 the new Rise Against album about how art is an instrument of war. So I think Picasso would agree that punk rock applies to politicsXD

Methinks Picasso is too busy rolling in his grave to have words put in his ossified mouth. Nonspecific, gimmicky lyrics that only tend to convey a vague sense of rebelling against "the man" are only political in the broadest sense. If they don't have intent to mobilize people to take real action for a cause or even to just vote, how's that political? It's cool to say you're some rebel who wants to fuck the system over, but without a cause or some belief, you're just a clueless hipster.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

22 Jan 2009, 10:33 pm

Radical chic FTL


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Magnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,372
Location: Claremont, California

22 Jan 2009, 11:45 pm

^ gay female hater club?



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

22 Jan 2009, 11:46 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Jesus was a revolutionary, not an anarchist. He acknowledged the secular authority of his day when he said, "Give unto God what is God's, give unto Caesar what is Caesar's."

Well, that fact is usually not denied by Christarchists. The issue they would argue is that Christ preached an indifference towards ruling authorities, and through that a means of overcoming the need for these authorities.



twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

23 Jan 2009, 12:07 am

Magnus wrote:
^ gay female hater club?

Not that, the other meaning (whichever one makes sense in this context).


_________________
* here for the nachos.


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

23 Jan 2009, 8:49 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
Jesus was a revolutionary, not an anarchist. He acknowledged the secular authority of his day when he said, "Give unto God what is God's, give unto Caesar what is Caesar's."

Well, that fact is usually not denied by Christarchists. The issue they would argue is that Christ preached an indifference towards ruling authorities, and through that a means of overcoming the need for these authorities.


Christarchists? Uh, no. Fail.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

23 Jan 2009, 10:48 am

slowmutant wrote:
Christarchists? Uh, no. Fail.

Christarchists, another name for Christian anarchists. I don't see how I "fail", all you did was dismiss me, and an idea that even some doctorate holding theologians have.



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

23 Jan 2009, 10:57 am

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
Christarchists? Uh, no. Fail.

Christarchists, another name for Christian anarchists. I don't see how I "fail", all you did was dismiss me, and an idea that even some doctorate holding theologians have.


Really? That's nice.

Anarchists reject all authority on principle, do they not? And Christians are instructed to obey both earthly and heavenly authority, ie. "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and render unto God what is God's." That quote was the reply Jesus gave to the Jewish pharisees when they asked him if it was a just thing to pay taxes to the state, ie. acknowledge the authority of the state.

Wouold a "Christarchist" recognize the authority of the priesthood? The authority of God Himself?



Magnus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,372
Location: Claremont, California

23 Jan 2009, 11:30 am

Anarchy means "without government" not "without God".
"There is no greater authority than God" is an anarchist type of statement.
That is the type of statement Jesus made over and over again in his teachings.