Clarifier wrote:
What’s the right planet for an Aspie? I would say it would have to be a planet where stuff makes sense, where there is a truly qualitative difference between objects and people, other than their stupid egos, a place where you don’t have to worry about ulterior motives in every damned thing they say. The prime ingredient of such a planet would have to be justice.
Evrything you've said above validates a world in which religion and superstition (at least, in any organised form) would have no place at all.
"
Stuff Makes Sense" - No more doubletalk about gods working in mysterious ways; no more declarations of undocumented and apocryphal events being miracles; and no more need to use the threat of eternal torment to keep people ignorant in order to provide a large and expendable labor force for the priest-kings to build temples, palaces, and armies.
"
Qualitative Difference Between Objects and People" - No more worship of geometric symbols, books, real estate, or natural phenomenon. No more use of same as "evidence" of supernatural beings. No more wars fought over crosses, stars, crescents, and the improvable concepts they may represent.
"
A Place Where You Don't Have To Worry About Ulterior Motives" - No more lies about faeries in the sky that love you, but who will make you and your descendents suffer unto the umpteenth generation if you don't immediately turn over your free will an all your gold to an old man in a dress who denies that the world is round and that any woman who has reached puberty must be sold off as chattel to the highest bidder ... with a percentage of the sale going directly to finance yet another monumental palace to one man's alleged piety and devotion to his gods, of course.
"
The Prime Ingredient of Such a Planet Would Have to be Justice" - Finally, the kind of justice that says that when money is given to help the poor,
it actually goes to help the poor, instead of being used to finance the extravagant lifestyles and estates of religious leaders. The kind of justice that says, "
You've made claims for the existance of a being without providing repeatably verifiable evidence for that being's existance, and further claimed that you are not merely telling fictional stories for amusement. Here is a legal order restraining your corruptive and immoral activities...".
I can hardly wait!
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.