Do you value pain?
Physical pain takes away all the worries of the world. If I'm in a lot of pain, I can't really think about anything else. Maybe some people create a pain in themselves so that they don't need to focus on real issues. You can divert the problem by focusing on an imaginary one. Also, if you invent a personal pain, whether it is physical or emotional, it is an unconscious way of being in control. After all, if it's all your own doing it can also be your own undoing.
_________________
As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other.
-Pythagoras
DentArthurDent
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
I suspect this is the origin of the concept of metaphorical pain, it alerts us to damaging styles of behaviour in much the same way as physical pain. As with physical pain some of us learn slower than others
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
Physical pain rawks. Just messed up me ankle hiking and I'm in for an episode out of Notes from Underground
(forgive my lack of seriousness, I tried it once and one of my eyeballs literally exploded out my head. terrible terrible stuff) But somewhat seriously physical pain even does not affect one uniformly. I have never found myself more than a little inconvenienced when I mess myself up out hiking. A physical pain can be galvanizing even, makes one feel stronger. But the more senseless and aimless pains of life, which lend no direction, and give you no enemy, no purpose, and lend no sense of order or balance cannot be similarly satisfying, and instead undermine ones sense of self, and one's relation to reality. Pain can affirm ones position in reality or rip the rug out underneath, and cannot be characterized by one or another without actively falsifying reality.
_________________
* here for the nachos.
postpaleo
Veteran
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,134
Location: North Mirage, Pennsyltucky
postpaleo
Veteran
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,134
Location: North Mirage, Pennsyltucky
I suspect this is the origin of the concept of metaphorical pain, it alerts us to damaging styles of behaviour in much the same way as physical pain. As with physical pain some of us learn slower than others
Yeah, see I don't want to get into a type of moderating here at all. I was leery of using physical pain as a for example. So when you used the word metaphorical, that, to me, is another way of looking at it, value it or not.
pain is a mechanism
humans are logical
we can circumvent certain mechanisms, by logic. for example, if i need to piss. i can feel that pinch. i still remain seated. i may be on the bus. i wont piss my pants or the bus, so i go against my mechanics, i control them, and hold back, because of logical reasoning.
pain is a signal, and with a concious attitude to it, thats all it is. i dunno how much can be GAINED from pain other than tolerance to more of it tho...
humans are logical
we can circumvent certain mechanisms, by logic. for example, if i need to piss. i can feel that pinch. i still remain seated. i may be on the bus. i wont piss my pants or the bus, so i go against my mechanics, i control them, and hold back, because of logical reasoning.
pain is a signal, and with a concious attitude to it, thats all it is. i dunno how much can be GAINED from pain other than tolerance to more of it tho...
I disagree. We are not logical, we are emotional systemizers. We can hold back our peeing through our emotional drives, but I doubt that the decision not to pee is something purely logical. For one, motivations tend to often be from some emotional urging as logic does not create it's own premises. For example, on your bus, why NOT pee? I mean, very few people will notice, and the ones who do notice probably will not do anything or even impact your life at any point in time. If you are soon to arrive at wherever you live, then you can change pants when you get there. Not only that, but if you do not care about other people(a logical possibility) then why care at all? Just pee in your pants if it feels better.
In any case, I think there is pretty solid evidence that people fail to be perfectly rational.
humans are logical
we can circumvent certain mechanisms, by logic. for example, if i need to piss. i can feel that pinch. i still remain seated. i may be on the bus. i wont piss my pants or the bus, so i go against my mechanics, i control them, and hold back, because of logical reasoning.
pain is a signal, and with a concious attitude to it, thats all it is. i dunno how much can be GAINED from pain other than tolerance to more of it tho...
I disagree. We are not logical, we are emotional systemizers. We can hold back our peeing through our emotional drives, because I doubt that the decision not to pee is something purely logical. For one, motivations tend to often be from some emotional urging as logic does not create it's own premises. For example, on your bus, why NOT pee? I mean, very few people will notice, and the ones who do notice probably will not do anything or even impact your life at any point in time. If you are soon to arrive at wherever you live, then you can change pants when you get there. Not only that, but if you do not care about other people(a logical possibility) then why care at all? Just pee in your pants if it feels better.
In any case, I think there is pretty solid evidence that people fail to be perfectly rational.
you broke down logic, and the meaning of the concept.
i aggree with your general breakdown but,
i can still stop myself from peeing - by using logic :]
emotionally i just wanna pee. i feel it, i want it out. but logically, i hold back, keep unsoiled pants, etc.
(if we keep breaking down reason/logic, we will discover that there is no such thing. it stems from abstract thinking, the ability to imagine, which is a survival tool.)
you guys are worse than me when it comes to breaking down specific words or concepts in a debate. i feel so at home here! :]
Well, not really. I just do not think that logic has motivational force. It is just a mechanism for understanding ideas and creating frameworks.
I don't think that logic can hold back emotions. I side with Nietzsche on this one: "The will to overcome an emotion, is ultimately only the will of another, or of several other, emotions."
Well, now, that is an argument I wasn't making at that moment in time. It is one thing to say that logic has no motivational force, and it is another to say that logic does not exist. It is certainly an argument one could make, and I think some have made arguments that what we call logic is not what we think it to be.
Yeah.... I am terrible about it I think.
Well, not really. I just do not think that logic has motivational force. It is just a mechanism for understanding ideas and creating frameworks.
I don't think that logic can hold back emotions. I side with Nietzsche on this one: "The will to overcome an emotion, is ultimately only the will of another, or of several other, emotions."
Well, now, that is an argument I wasn't making at that moment in time. It is one thing to say that logic has no motivational force, and it is another to say that logic does not exist. It is certainly an argument one could make, and I think some have made arguments that what we call logic is not what we think it to be.
Yeah.... I am terrible about it I think.
i am aggreeing with you, but we seem to have a different, um, preference of words to use.
this happens when debating w some other aspie i know. we argue for hours, untill we discover that we aggreed the entire time, just using different nomenclature.
the whole point i was making was this:
humans can stop and observe pain, we should use that advantage, since we have it.
(did that even come through at all, in my original reply??)
humans are logical
we can circumvent certain mechanisms, by logic. for example, if i need to piss. i can feel that pinch. i still remain seated. i may be on the bus. i wont piss my pants or the bus, so i go against my mechanics, i control them, and hold back, because of logical reasoning.
pain is a signal, and with a concious attitude to it, thats all it is. i dunno how much can be GAINED from pain other than tolerance to more of it tho...
I disagree. We are not logical, we are emotional systemizers. We can hold back our peeing through our emotional drives, but I doubt that the decision not to pee is something purely logical. For one, motivations tend to often be from some emotional urging as logic does not create it's own premises. For example, on your bus, why NOT pee? I mean, very few people will notice, and the ones who do notice probably will not do anything or even impact your life at any point in time. If you are soon to arrive at wherever you live, then you can change pants when you get there. Not only that, but if you do not care about other people(a logical possibility) then why care at all? Just pee in your pants if it feels better.
In any case, I think there is pretty solid evidence that people fail to be perfectly rational.
I agree that logic does not dictate action and emotion is the fundamental engine of choice but logic does present consequences of action and emotion can thus choose amongst consequences. If you feel comfortable sitting in wet irritating pants on public transportation and are emotionally secure in the contempt of your fellow passengers then you might go ahead and pee but logic can only present possibilities.
I can agree with this somewhat. Of course, the outcomes are somewhat distorted in our mind's eye due to our emotions, but still it would be hard to deny your claim unless one were to take the extreme stance that logical processing systems did not exist in the mind.
