Page 11 of 12 [ 179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

13 Jun 2012, 7:09 am

Kjas wrote:
:lol: Jineteras don't get paid quite that much, but I take your point. Doctors have the option of doing stints overseas (anywhere from 6 months to 2 year postings) and if they choose to do that, they get paid by international standards, which means they come back to the island very rich. We have too many doctors in Cuba, that is why the overseas option is so well paid.


A Cuban doctor abroad earns 400 dollars a month. :P If I remember correctly, the government of Angola pays 70,000 dollars for two years worth of service per doctor. A prostitute really doesn't have to work that much to earn 400 dollars either.

Quote:
But many of the economic conditions are due to the blockade (not embargo, there is a difference), which was imposed by the US and has been backed up by other countries also.


It has become to easy for the government to blame the embargo. The embargo haven't prevented the Castro family from buying luxury cars or the hotels from buying flat screen televisions.

Edit: No EU countries are allowed to follow the Helms-Burton act. Furthermore, neither Canada nor most (if any) Latin-American countries follows it. The American embargo itself doesn't cover food, medical equipment and some types of IT equipment. Computers sold in Cuba do for instance have Intel CPUs and run Microsoft Windows, but some entertainment feature (eg. Xbox Live or MSN) doesn't work.

The PRC won't do business with anyone who has diplomatic ties to Taiwan, but Taiwan is still on par with Western-Europe.

Quote:
The problem with imposing that blockade on the people, is that they cannot tell the difference between why he is in power. He is in power because of the situation, not because of the people. Therefore the blockade accomplishes nothing because it is based on the wrong causation, it only hurts the people and strengthens Castro.


Correct, but when the US goernment does something wrong, they never admit it. They have the same not-my-fault policy as Apple.



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

13 Jun 2012, 8:06 am

Kurgan wrote:
A Cuban doctor abroad earns 400 dollars a month. :P If I remember correctly, the government of Angola pays 70,000 dollars for two years worth of service per doctor. A prostitute really doesn't have to work that much to earn 400 dollars either.


Yes, but it is $35 to $40 a month back in Cuba depending on their specialization. $400 dollars a month (10 times more), every month for 24 months is a boatload of money, especially once you convert it to the peso, which gives much more buying power than CUC.

Jineteras aren't necessarily who you think they are. There are some women who do it full time, where it has become their profession. $20-$50 a night is accurate if it's only going to be that night, if it is a one-time thing. However, that (ONS) does not seem to be the majority, it tends to work a little differently.

Many of them are normal women trying to find a way to pay their way for themselves or their families, who otherwise hold good and very respectable jobs. Many of them many have a couple of yumas they see every time they are in the country, and when they're not in the country some of them still send a little bit of money. When they are in the country, often the arrangement means that she will be seeing the guy the entire time he is here (for a set amount of weeks). Sometimes it's payment is not done in money, but in gifts. It all depends. It's kind of a running joke there that if you don't have at least one girl friend who is jinetera, then you're not really a cuban.

Especially for those who have a yuma for a number of weeks, the $50 a night thing is nowhere near accurate, it would be much less, and is paid bit by bit as they go along. People don't like to call it "prostitution", even if that's exactly what it is. Nor do many of them like to "feel" like it is that, so often they try to avoid that as much as possible, which also helps them rationalize it to themselves afterwards. They like to treat it like they have a regular cuban girlfriend every time they are in Cuba. This is still technically prostitution, but nobody (either the guy or the girl involved) actually want to call it that.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

21 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm

Che was a Commie thug.

ruveyn



CyborgUprising
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,963
Location: auf der Fahrt durch Niemandsland

21 Jul 2012, 8:41 pm

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist. It's all relative to the cultures involved.



nominalist
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,740
Location: Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (born in NYC)

21 Jul 2012, 8:45 pm

Che was a nationalist hero. However, he was also, like everyone else, a flawed human being.


_________________
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. (retired tenured sociology professor)
36 domains/24 books: http://www.markfoster.net
Emancipated Autism: http://www.neurelitism.com
Institute for Dialectical metaRealism: http://dmr.institute


Guppy
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 188
Location: Somewhere below the North Sea

02 Aug 2012, 10:11 pm

He was a Stalinist, with Maoist influences, and hence would probably put me in a labour camp of some sort. He was also deeply homophobic, and so on. Regardless, in the context of his actions and the society he grew up with, I'mma have to say hero.



compiledkernel
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jun 2012
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 224

02 Aug 2012, 10:55 pm

Che's benefit to the aspects of Geurilla warfare, all instance of who he was aside, are a testament to his contribution to the idea of warfare in general.

Edited: Retraction

Hitler was as paramount to certain types of military strategy(Mobile infantry and armour -- The Blitzkreig), the same could be said for Napoleon (I think Stonewall Jackson in the americas even carried around a book containing many of Napoleon's strategies of Annihilation). Both of which were horridly misguided, and generally disliked historically, and guilty of many more war crimes, Im sure many of which the exact nature will never be known.


_________________
An Old NetSec Engineer. Diag 11/29.
A1: AS 299.80 A2: SPD features 301.20
GAF: 50 - 60 range.
PMs are fine, but my answers are probably going to be weird.


Last edited by compiledkernel on 04 Aug 2012, 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Aug 2012, 3:35 am

nominalist wrote:
Che was a nationalist hero. However, he was also, like everyone else, a flawed human being.


Che was a thug. His ideology does not excuse his immorality. Both a left wing criminal and a right wing criminal are criminals.

ruveyn



AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

04 Aug 2012, 8:47 am

CyborgUprising wrote:
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist. It's all relative to the cultures involved.
Why is it so hard to draw any sort of line? It's a matter of intent and means. A "freedom fighter" that blows himself up in a crowded area is obviously not gaining any strategic advantage from it.



Guppy
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 188
Location: Somewhere below the North Sea

04 Aug 2012, 9:22 am

AceOfSpades wrote:
CyborgUprising wrote:
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist. It's all relative to the cultures involved.
Why is it so hard to draw any sort of line? It's a matter of intent and means. A "freedom fighter" that blows himself up in a crowded area is obviously not gaining any strategic advantage from it.

Quite the opposite. Suicide bombings can be very demoralizing to, say, an occupant force. Also purely militarily effective, as for example Syria has shown.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Aug 2012, 10:30 am

nominalist wrote:
Che was a nationalist hero. However, he was also, like everyone else, a flawed human being.


One could say the same about Hitler. He was very flawed, but he regained German rights by abrogating the unjust and vicious Versailles Treaty. Had he stopped with getting the Rhineland back from France he would have been hailed as the greatest statesman in German history.

ruveyn



The_Walrus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,878
Location: London

04 Aug 2012, 11:19 am

AceOfSpades wrote:
CyborgUprising wrote:
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist. It's all relative to the cultures involved.
Why is it so hard to draw any sort of line? It's a matter of intent and means. A "freedom fighter" that blows himself up in a crowded area is obviously not gaining any strategic advantage from it.

The individual isn't, because he's dead. Perhaps his cause is.



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

04 Aug 2012, 1:47 pm

Raptor wrote:

My whole point is that in practice communism/marxism kills and history shows this to be true. I've studied Marx, Engels, and Hegel enough to understand the theory but the implementation of that ideology ends up oppressive when the implementation of those ideologies hit the inevitable resistance.

As far as the Bush thing I know you didn't say anything about that but during that era the administration was shamelessly compared to the third reich and the sith, believe it or not, by some. I remember it and thought it was hilarious.


Meanwhile, in capitalist Africa....

Image



thomas81
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland

04 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm

ruveyn wrote:
nominalist wrote:
Che was a nationalist hero. However, he was also, like everyone else, a flawed human being.


One could say the same about Hitler. He was very flawed, but he regained German rights by abrogating the unjust and vicious Versailles Treaty. Had he stopped with getting the Rhineland back from France he would have been hailed as the greatest statesman in German history.

ruveyn


The difference was, Che made no attempt to systematically exterminate a race of people on the sole basis of their ethnicity.

You can argue the metaphysics or the point about numbers all you want but there remains a severe distinction between mass murder and attempted genocide.

Not being a conventional socialist I will neither attempt to defend or condemn Che however I get quite irate reading some of the ill founded statements on ideologies which the posters concerned have little understanding of.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

04 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm

thomas81 wrote:

The difference was, Che made no attempt to systematically exterminate a race of people on the sole basis of their ethnicity.



Neither did Hitler or his buddies until the end of 1941. Their first attempt was to eject the Jews from Germany, but no one else would take the except for the few that could get to the U.S. or Palestine. Eventually, the Brits gave into to Arab pressure and put a stop to Jewish emigration to Palestine.

ruveyn