You know you're a sniveling liberal when...

Post Reply New Topic

That was because of the dumb Kurgan thread. Rather than starting a new counter-thread, they decided to save on effort, economize, and not duplicate services. Since you've done this tit for tat, I might have to start another thread to get us in the REAL equilibrium.

Great to see that my hometown has its own satirical comedy now, called Less Than Kind, of all things.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX05MDMC5do[/youtube]

Aw. How sweet!

You know that you're a sniveling liberal when you catch a cold or have nasal allergies. Otherwise, you would be a non-sniveling liberal.

Personal attack on another WP member.


By all means, do so.

When you start (under another user name) and resurrect a thread titled "You KNOW that you're a Right Wing Nut Job when..."

That's been done already.

We needed that /\ since there was this \/ to make things symmetrical.

Educated people get upset when the uninformed spout nonsense that effects everyone's lives. Any educated person knows that facts and science are real and that the entire world's scientific community is not part of some conspiracy headed by the masons, Illuminati or bigfoot. EVERY scientific organization in the world stands by AGW. *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific ... ate_change
Yes, that is wiki. However, it has links to the primary sites that prove that EVERY scientific organization of national and/or international reputation stands by AGW. NASA, Scientific American, National Geographic, American meteorological Association, and every scientific organization in the world is part of a conspiracy?
I guess it is only natural that conservatives hate science and logic.
*Anthropogenic Global Warming, in other words that humans have greatly contributed to the current crisis.

Last edited by wittgenstein on 07 Aug 2013, 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Here is Scientific American’s * response to all the junk science put out by the cult of global warming deniers .
http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... n-nonsense
* OH , I forgot Scientific American ( tho highly respected for journalistic integrity ) is part of the conspiracy headed by Bigfoot. ( sarcasm) I'm sorry. Climate change deniers cannot be taken seriously. Their rejection of science and logic makes them look buffoonish.
The conspiracy enthusiasts cannot claim facts or logic, so they must come up with bizarre conspiracy theories. For example that Bigfoot, the Illuminati or the masons have forced the entire world's scientific community to tell lies.
Since they believe that scientific research is illegitimate, doesn't that mean that they have no legitimate scientific sources to show that AGW is not real? I prefer to believe in science, the scientific method and logic. Why am I upset? Because, this hatred for logic and science has real consequences and they aint good!

Depends on what education and who's facts and science.
When told often enough, a lie becomes the truth.

So EVERY scientific organization in the world is telling lies?

HMMMMMMMMMM
NASA
Scientific American
American Meteorological Society
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Royal Society
American Geophysical Union
American Society of Agronomy
Geological Society of America
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
And 98% of climate scientists.*are all part of the conspiracy of lies????
*Of course 2% are funded by the oil industry.
PS; There are many many more, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific ... ate_change . As I said EVERY scientific organization in the world of national and/or international reputation agrees with AGW and disagree with the conspiracy enthusiasts.

if you believe that America spends too much on arms.
if you believe that American unilateralism is a bad thing.
if you think the poor should be able to access healthcare.

What about NASA's 2011 report that data from their satellites doesn't back up the "global warning" theory?
Yeah, they they admitted they were wrong when their funding was in jeopardy due to the unpopularity of their data.
Science and facts are just fine as long as the follow the narrative and don't upset those that control the purse strings.
I could post links but you wouldn't click on them any more than I would on yours.

Envy, more than anything.


With a military like ours why bother with unilateralism?


They're not barred from it.