ruveyn wrote:
Fallout did affect some (for example some Japanese fishermen on the Unlucky-Maru got a dose of fallout and some died). The number of people killed by fallout from the tests was far less than the number who die in automobile accidents each year.
Firstly I suggest that you talk to the ex residents of Rongelap about fallout. Secondly the atmospheric tests were done over unpopulated Islands so your car arguement ahs no relevance
ruveyn wrote:
All this garment rending over nukes! We killed more people in one night in Tokyo (March 1945) than in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was done with non-nuclear weapons. Incendiary (General Le May's choice) bombs set a fire storm that wiped out 16 square miles of Tokyo's most densely populated district. 125,000 people were turned into charcoal briquettes in one night.
And in Essen and Dresden the same thing, but again your argument is disengenuos, the deaths caused by these firestorms stopped with those immediately effected. with Nagasaki and Hiroshima the death toll is arguably still rising the generational effect of the radiation is continuing to produce cancers and the like.
Also the bombs used on Japan were miniscule in comparision to what we have today. DO you really think that America will come out a Nuclear War with its society entact!
You talk of caring only for what affects the US, EVERYTHING EFFECTS THE US we all effectivley live on an Island without boats
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx