TM wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
you brought up an interesting point... so you think that women should act like stereotypical men in order to get paid as much as them... and that would be a form of gender discrimination.
I think that women should be required to be a man's equal in work performance in order to get an equal paycheck. As I said about the doctors earlier, where the men made quite a bit more than the women because they worked 500 hours more per year, in that case the pay gap is perfectly reasonable. Everyone has to make choices as "having it all" is not possible. It's not gender discrimination its performance discrimination. I don't think you mean that a woman should get paid an equal check for lesser work do you? (Not a straw-man, just making sure). This doesn't include "stereotypical male behavior" it means approaching the job in the same way as the people you work with do.
If I work 40 hours a week, take every weekend off, refuse to deal with clients outside of those 40 hours and so on, it wouldn't be fair if I was paid the same check as a colleague that works 60 hours a week, 3 weekends a month and is available for clients 19 hours a day provided the extra time that person put in resulted in more work getting done.
If you were specifically referring to the testosterone and estrogen comments, I don't think I've ever met a woman who say they aren't more emotional when they have more estrogen. More emotion, can manifest in negative ways, such as snapping on clients, crying in meetings and so on. On the same note, punching a client in the face due to more testosterone would have the same negative impact.
women aren't actually less skilled at doing jobs because of their hormones, which is what you are implying. in male-dominated fields they may not be accustomed to the way
some females come across, but the work performance doesn't actually suffer. hormones do not cause women to perform poorly.
and you are going off on a tangent. when people have sex change operations, they don't suddenly stop performing their jobs properly (or get better at it because they have different hormones). AND they don't cut back their hours just because they are now female. if you truly believe that women's hormones make them worse at jobs, you're going to need to back that up with some kind of evidence.
by the way... you are talking to a woman right now who doesn't get overly emotional from estrogen. *nobody* can tell where i am in my monthly cycle, not even the man i was with for 20 years. you're drawing some kind of strange conclusion there based on popular stereotypes.
and that's what this is really about. some employers may make assumptions about female employees so that even if their work is the same as a man's, they are considered less worthy.
I wasn't actually implying that women are less capable of work due to their hormones, even though
perhaps indicates something. A bit of that could be staying home with children. The reason I mentioned the hormones are that increased hormone levels do affect people,
And this is just a safety response if you wanted to add that tired old tripe about housework.