Donald Trump is not a Bigot or Racist..

Post Reply New Topic

dispute away. you're going to have to do better than the post where you claim men are oppressed ( I think they are by being expected to live up to some macho standard) because i couldn't force myself to read beyond the first article after finding it had little to do with the claim you said it supported. two false accusations don't add up to systemic oppression.

In the United States. 25 million white people live in poverty. That is more than the amount of African Americans 10 million and Hispanics 10 million put together. The majority of people living off food stamps are white people. If you look at the states of West Virginia and Kentucky the income is 40,000 that is less than what is earned by Hispanic Americans.

Stop denigrating White Americans many of them have it tough. We got to reach out to those people.

are you being sarcastic? raw numbers don't tell the story. the % of minorites who live in poverty is much higher,

It is higher. But if we paint white people with the same dismal brush and ignore the struggles they go through we risk alienating them.

I did not say this but the median African American income is actually only slightly higher 39,000 than it is for the median African American income 35,000.

This is a major cause of oppression. When a group of people get told their problems aren't real or don't matter.

Thank you retro. Damn toxic SJWs.

That's a good term for them. It's sadly ironic the way they think they're helping people but really they're marginalising millions of people. One day people like feral botanist may have a harmful effect on public policy.

No they don't. The "systematic" part doesn't come from the false accusation but from the way systems deal with it.

As you said, when you dealt with rape investigations, there was no presumption of guilt. Not all proceedings are so enlightened. Not everyone wants to keep it that way.

I don't think it's reasonable to expect to eliminate false rape accusations from society. Just as I don't expect we'll ever eliminate burglary or fraud or any kind of crime. As I said, the "systematic" part does not come from the accusers.

Of course men are expected to live up to a macho standard. Sometimes by women but often by other men. I'm not saying we should eliminate the macho elements of our culture. Moving men from one small box to another won't help anyone. I'd like to see a culture based around individual differences.

I was once involved with a woman who false rape accusations against other men and I was scared. You might not think that's very macho of me but I think I had good reason to be scared. I'm not in contact with her anymore.

I'm not trying to say I was more scared of her than women are of potential rapists. I don't think that way. It doesn't matter who has it worse. All problems are serious even when other people have worse problems.

If Fred broke his arm and Barney broke both of his arms, I would not expect Fred to refuse medical treatment on the basis that his problem isn't as bad as Barney's.

Honestly I don't expect you to read through all that text. It would take ages. I provided the links mainly as sources.

Good GOD----do you EVER learn (read)! !

First-of-all, RetroGamer87 said right in his title for #1: "The systematic presumption of guilt by the police in rape accusations"----and, he didn't use the word "systemic"----AND, if his title's not enough to convince you, how 'bout THESE statements:


As for "two false accusations": It's awful funny that I read SIX (Jay, James, Chris, David, Ben, and Nigel)----and, statements, like:


.....are enough to convince ME, that there are many more, where THEY came-from----see all those esses / plurals, in there!!

What----you mean when you asked the question about people who did not understand consent?

I didn't see any problem with your asking that, whatsoever----but, who KNOWS how the crybabies'll feel about it; you'll have to wait until one of 'em passes-through, and see if they say something.

Don't worry about how you come-across on here (PPR)----as long as you don't break the rules (main, plus PPR rules)----if somebody doesn't don their big boy / girl pants ("trousers" to you, maybe), and gets "sliced and diced", that's THEIR problem!!

Maybe, my most FAVORITE line in the PPR rules, is: "Provided people don't get too out of hand this forum is given a wide scope for debate; which frankly is what the members themselves want here...".

I am starting to see what Rand Paul was saying when he said that liberals did not understand his people in Kentucky.

Thanks that was helpful.

What----what do you see----what was he saying? Just curious.....

Are you being sarcastic? Just checkin'.....

When someone dismisses a whole section of society they are also giving a green light for other people to dismiss other sections of society.

Indeed, Mr. Biscuit.