Do you Think We Should Start A War with China?

Post Reply New Topic

careful there kid, your reply is bordering on ret*d.

1. check polarism in a dictionary. it doesnt have to do with polar bears.
2. who says stalin was worse? germany killed more people, plus had a racial ideology. stalin's war was about revenge, for well over 10 million dead russians. but you havent done any ww2 research beyond "saving private ryan" have you?
3. how far have the chinese come in their invasion? idiotic argument, dude. idiotic. the argument of an idiot. not that i am in any way implying that you are one.
4. who says china is gonna invade EU? oh yes, YOU say so, and... um... see above
5. yeah cus china is obviously the country rolling over countries w tanks lately :b

why do you insist on refusing how-many-pages now of INFORMATION given to you, in more or less PATIENT replies?
you resist and resist and resist, your next reply will be another ret*d stretch for a war, "but china has nukes" "but they wanna invade EU"

why do you INSIST on preffering ignorance on this matter?

ill debate you this when your a bit older and out of school.
stop watching movies, they make you dumb.

What country has been the most belligerent, jingoistic and interventionistic lately?

Is it:

a) China

or

b) America

I'm betting five bucks on option b).

The US doesn't invade peaceful nations. Which nation are more people trying to enter?

A) China

or

B) The United States

careful there kid, your reply is bordering on ret*d.

"1. check polarism in a dictionary. it doesnt have to do with polar bears. "

Yah think? Except "polarism" isn't a word, polarization is what you looking for.

"2. who says stalin was worse? germany killed more people, plus had a racial ideology. stalin's war was about revenge, for well over 10 million dead russians. but you havent done any ww2 research beyond "saving private ryan" have you?"

I would say killing 24 million was worse than killing 12 million. Not to mention Russia killed and sucked the blood out of their own children to give transfusions to soldiers.

"3. how far have the chinese come in their invasion? idiotic argument, dude. idiotic. the argument of an idiot. not that i am in any way implying that you are one."

China has already taken over three countries. It doesn't matter to you, because they are not European nations with wealth. By 2020 they will surpass all nations economically, population, militarily, and technologically.

"4. who says china is gonna invade EU? oh yes, YOU say so, and... um... see above "

Good point, they might not be considered significant enough to invade.

"5. yeah cus china is obviously the country rolling over countries w tanks lately :b"

You obviously were born after 1990 if you are not aware that China rolls over protesters with tanks. Or that it has taken over several nations against their will.

"ill debate you this when your a bit older and out of school.
stop watching movies, they make you dumb."

I am better educated than you. I know how to spell, and know the meaning of terms in which I use. I am well educated on China or political structure. Even got'm degrees.

You think simplistically. You don't realize China is thinking long term, like 30-200 years. If China is not impeded now, it will own the world in 50-200 years. There is not ONE economist, statistician, military expert, or politician that will tell you otherwise. An evil empire, which thinks little in the way of human rights, controlling the world, is a step backwards, not forwards.

No, stop bombing countries up. And don't worry Obama won't be going to war with China anyway.

No, Obama is going to war with Afghanistan.

Lol, you've had troops in there since 2001 He's just taking them out of the Iraq disaster and putting them into Afghanistan and near the Pakistan border to try and find um Bin Laden and to keep on top of the Taliban. You're not going to war with the country itself.

I guess. We are there and fighting to unseat the existing powers. I think Bin Laudin has more troops and support of the people of the country than the puppet government there now.

I guess we could do the same in China, back a fake government and pretend we are just fighting the rebel forces. We did that once before, it didn't work out too well.

wars save the economy, brilliant.

China is a different animal. War wouldn't happen against them unless their president/prime minister personally ordered an attack on the US.

idahoaspie, now your talking about 200 years into the future?

then what about india?

what about even nigeria? brazil? RUSSIA, GERMANY

THE EU?

how do you know WE wont attack YOU guys before 200 years have passed?

and no. they didnt roll over students, in fact, the famous clip shows the tank...... ....... ....... stopping.
=)

Would you rather children starve? Brilliant.

Because we all know more war = more food. Brilliant.

lol.

The only countries that do really need sorting out are Zimbabwe and North Korea at the moment. But Bush went into Iraq!

China will have a population of two billion, military strength, industrial might, and economic means to crush the other half of the world. It won't even have to fight. No one would be willing to challenge them.

In all honesty, what could Europe do if China decided to invade Europe? It doesn't have a sizable conventional army to defend itself, and doesn't have the backbone to drop nuclear bombs on millions of innocent people. It has not defenses. The USA and Russia is your only defense.

India is a democracy. So it isn't a threat. It is a peaceful nation. Russia doesn't have the industrial and economic might as China, or a growing population. In fact, Russia, like the EU, is losing population. USA, India, and China are the only major nations gaining population.

That's because Bush is stooge.