Page 17 of 22 [ 350 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 22  Next


What is the primary reason for disapproval of homosexuality?
Religion 36%  36%  [ 40 ]
Fear that homosexuals will be attracted to YOU 3%  3%  [ 3 ]
Fear of disintegrating gender roles 10%  10%  [ 11 ]
Male fear of gay anal rape 5%  5%  [ 5 ]
Homosexual intercourse cannot produce children 4%  4%  [ 4 ]
It just icks people out 18%  18%  [ 20 ]
It defies social norms 10%  10%  [ 11 ]
Other (please explain below) 15%  15%  [ 16 ]
Total votes : 110

androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

07 Jan 2012, 3:47 pm

So a public display of sex should be punished?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm

androbot2084 wrote:
So a public display of sex should be punished?


I would not say punished. Disapproved of and discouraged. To lovers who wish to writhe in each other's arms I would say: "Get a room".

ruveyn



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

07 Jan 2012, 3:55 pm

I dare you to say that at a pride parade.



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

07 Jan 2012, 6:04 pm

I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

I sympathize with straight people (and some gay people) who find Pride marches annoying, if not outright revolting. However, the problem is that it really is necessary--or used to be, anyway--to be that extreme and that obnoxious to make people realize, you can't just force people to stay in hiding and skulk about in the darkness just because you happen to be squeamish. If it's going to be like that, we'll just run off anyone we can't desensitize.

However, this isn't to say that the way people behave in Pride marches isn't obscene and offensive. In a way, it is supposed to be obscene and offensive. It's a way of saying, "if you can't stay out of our bedrooms, we'll just make the whole world our bedroom, so how about that?" It's an ultimatum. The freaky, obscene crap will stop when straight people show more of a willingness to live and let live and to let the queers try to live something resembling normal lives. I think that you would see a very strong cause-and-effect relationship there.

Therefore, I agree with you in the long-run, Ruveyn, that most people should be expected to observe a certain standard of respectability and decency. Frankly, I think that gay or straight people who can't behave themselves in public are low ghetto trash, under normal circumstances. On the other hand, if our government were to pass a law saying that gay people--and only gay people--should observe one standard, and straight people were to be held to another, I would consider it to be my god-given duty to show my figurative ass just as often as I possibly could, just so I could have the opportunity to break the legs of the first dumbass cop who tried to enforce it. Savvy?



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,317
Location: Pacific Northwest

07 Jan 2012, 9:28 pm

They think it's a sin and god doesn't approve of it.

But I also don't understand why people make it their own issue.



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

07 Jan 2012, 10:26 pm

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

I sympathize with straight people (and some gay people) who find Pride marches annoying, if not outright revolting. However, the problem is that it really is necessary--or used to be, anyway--to be that extreme and that obnoxious to make people realize, you can't just force people to stay in hiding and skulk about in the darkness just because you happen to be squeamish. If it's going to be like that, we'll just run off anyone we can't desensitize.

However, this isn't to say that the way people behave in Pride marches isn't obscene and offensive. In a way, it is supposed to be obscene and offensive. It's a way of saying, "if you can't stay out of our bedrooms, we'll just make the whole world our bedroom, so how about that?" It's an ultimatum. The freaky, obscene crap will stop when straight people show more of a willingness to live and let live and to let the queers try to live something resembling normal lives. I think that you would see a very strong cause-and-effect relationship there.

Therefore, I agree with you in the long-run, Ruveyn, that most people should be expected to observe a certain standard of respectability and decency. Frankly, I think that gay or straight people who can't behave themselves in public are low ghetto trash, under normal circumstances. On the other hand, if our government were to pass a law saying that gay people--and only gay people--should observe one standard, and straight people were to be held to another, I would consider it to be my god-given duty to show my figurative ass just as often as I possibly could, just so I could have the opportunity to break the legs of the first dumbass cop who tried to enforce it. Savvy?


Why is it obscene and offensive? It doesn't hurt anybody. Isn't god against gay men and women anyway? (at least in the bible)

Also, stop comparing me to your grandmother. Please.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

07 Jan 2012, 11:00 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Also, the heterosexual act can produce children. The homosexual act cannot.

ruveyn

Are you stating this as a con to homosexual sex or as a pro?


_________________
.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

08 Jan 2012, 3:01 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Also, the heterosexual act can produce children. The homosexual act cannot.

ruveyn

Are you stating this as a con to homosexual sex or as a pro?


Just showing the difference.

I am not con to private consenting sex acts between adults. While I do not oppose such acts, neither do I want to know about them. Private is Private.

If adults want to participate in utterly disgusting abominations, then let them as long as it is mutually consenting.

ruveyn



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

08 Jan 2012, 6:03 am

ruveyn wrote:

If adults want to participate in utterly disgusting abominations, then let them as long as it is mutually consenting.

ruveyn


Why do people think it's a disgusting abomination?



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

08 Jan 2012, 7:37 am

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Also, stop comparing me to your grandmother. Please.
Okay, let me list what you're doing here.

1) First, you claimed that men are "disgusting by nature," which is an extremely sexist and...rather childish remark.

2) You compared homosexuality to a "scat fetish."

3) And now you're making back-handed insults against my grandmother, which is...weak.

Well, I hope you know that I know who you are, and I know where to find you. I even have a picture of you!

Image

And your name is Poop!



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

08 Jan 2012, 8:43 am

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
ruveyn wrote:

If adults want to participate in utterly disgusting abominations, then let them as long as it is mutually consenting.

ruveyn


Why do people think it's a disgusting abomination?


One of two reasons. Either they have been taught that it is an abomination, or because is truly is an abomination.

ruveyn



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

08 Jan 2012, 10:46 am

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Also, stop comparing me to your grandmother. Please.
Okay, let me list what you're doing here.

1) First, you claimed that men are "disgusting by nature," which is an extremely sexist and...rather childish remark.

2) You compared homosexuality to a "scat fetish."

3) And now you're making back-handed insults against my grandmother, which is...weak.

Well, I hope you know that I know who you are, and I know where to find you. I even have a picture of you!

Image

And your name is Poop!


I wasn't trying to insult your grandmother (wtf?).

And I was joking before. About just about everything. You're so strange.



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 73,351
Location: Over there

08 Jan 2012, 11:12 am

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
And I was joking before. About just about everything. You're so strange.
You should probably make that much clearer in future - it would help avoid misunderstandings.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

08 Jan 2012, 11:24 am

ruveyn wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
ruveyn wrote:

If adults want to participate in utterly disgusting abominations, then let them as long as it is mutually consenting.

ruveyn


Why do people think it's a disgusting abomination?


One of two reasons. Either they have been taught that it is an abomination, or because is truly is an abomination.

ruveyn


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... nimal.html

Quote:
Birds do it, bees do it, even educated fleas do it. So go the lyrics penned by U.S. songwriter Cole Porter.

Porter, who first hit it big in the 1920s, wouldn't risk parading his homosexuality in public. In his day "the birds and the bees" generally meant only one thing—sex between a male and female
But, actually, some same-sex birds do do it. So do beetles, sheep, fruit bats, dolphins, and orangutans. Zoologists are discovering that homosexual and bisexual activity is not unknown within the animal kingdom.

Roy and Silo, two male chinstrap penguins at New York's Central Park Zoo have been inseparable for six years now. They display classic pair-bonding behavior—entwining of necks, mutual preening, flipper flapping, and the rest. They also have sex, while ignoring potential female mates.

Wild birds exhibit similar behavior. There are male ostriches that only court their own gender, and pairs of male flamingos that mate, build nests, and even raise foster chicks.

Filmmakers recently went in search of homosexual wild animals as part of a National Geographic Ultimate Explorer documentary about the female's role in the mating game. (The film, Girl Power, will be screened in the U.S this Saturday at 8 p.m. ET, 5 p.m PT on MSNBC TV.)

The team caught female Japanese macaques engaged in intimate acts which, if observed in humans, would be in the X-rated category.

"The homosexual behavior that goes on is completely baffling and intriguing," says National Geographic Ultimate Explorer correspondent, Mireya Mayor. "You would have thought females that want to be mated, especially over their fertile period, would be seeking out males."

Well, perhaps, in a roundabout way, they are seeking males, suggests primatologist Amy Parish.

She argues that female macaques may enhance their social position through homosexual intimacy which in turn influences breeding success. Parish says, "Taking something that's nonreproductive, like mounting another female—if it leads to control of a resource or acquisition of a resource or a good alliance partner, that could directly impact your reproductive success."
On the other hand, they could just be enjoying themselves, suggests Paul Vasey, animal behavior professor at the University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. "They're engaging in the behavior because it's gratifying sexually or it's sexually pleasurable," he says. "They just like it. It doesn't have any sort of adaptive payoff."

Matthew Grober, biology professor at Georgia State University, agrees, saying, "If [sex] wasn't fun, we wouldn't have any kids around. So I think that maybe Japanese macaques have taken the fun aspect of sex and really run with it."

The bonobo, an African ape closely related to humans, has an even bigger sexual appetite. Studies suggest 75 percent of bonobo sex is nonreproductive and that nearly all bonobos are bisexual. Frans de Waal, author of Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape, calls the species a "make love, not war" primate. He believes bonobos use sex to resolve conflicts between individuals.

Other animals appear to go through a homosexual phase before they become fully mature. For instance, male dolphin calves often form temporary sexual partnerships, which scientists believe help to establish lifelong bonds. Such sexual behavior has been documented only relatively recently. Zoologists have been accused of skirting round the subject for fear of stepping into a political minefield.

"There was a lot of hiding of what was going on, I think, because people were maybe afraid that they would get into trouble by talking about it," notes de Waal. Whether it's a good idea or not, it's hard not make comparisons between humans and other animals, especially primates. The fact that homosexuality does, after all, exist in the natural world is bound to be used against people who insist such behavior is unnatural.

So how far can we go in using animals to help us understand human homosexuality? Robin Dunbar is a professor of evolutionary psychology at the University of Liverpool, England. "The bottom line is that anything that happens in other primates, and particularly other apes, is likely to have strong evolutionary continuity with what happens in humans," he said.

Dunbar says the bonobo's use of homosexual activity for social bonding is a possible example, adding, "One of the main arguments for human homosexual behavior is that it helps bond male groups together, particularly where a group of individuals are dependent on each other, as they might be in hunting or warfare."

For instance, the Spartans, in ancient Greece, encouraged homosexuality among their elite troops. "They had the not unreasonable belief that individuals would stick by and make all efforts to rescue other individuals if they had a lover relationship," Dunbar added.

Another suggestion is that homosexuality is a developmental phase people go through. He said, "This is similar to the argument of play in young animals to get their brain and muscles to work effectively and together. Off the back of this, there's the possibility you can get individuals locked into this phase for the rest of their lives as a result of the social environment they grow up in."

But he adds that homosexuality doesn't necessarily have to have a function. It could be a spin-off or by-product of something else and in itself carries no evolutionary weight."

He cites sexual gratification, which encourages procreation, as an example. "An organism is designed to maximize its motivational systems," he adds.

In other words, if the urge to have sex is strong enough it may spill over into nonreproductive sex, as suggested by the actions of the bonobos and macaques. However, as Dunbar admits, there's a long way to go before the causes of homosexuality in humans are fully understood.


Other animal species engage in homosexuality, and don't care if something is an "abomination" or not. Ergo, people who consider homosexuality (or anything, for that matter) to be an abomination, must have been taught to consider it an abomination. Nothing is truly an abomination, without thinking making it so. Hence, "abomination" itself is simply a mental construct, and not something real.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUwza5Grxos[/youtube]



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

08 Jan 2012, 12:39 pm

^^
That is correct. It is well documented that its in the animal kingdom and that is an answer to people who say its unnatural. I have seen a documentary about it, it was so funny. There was a gay sheep, and two gay swans. And the documentary made it as scientific as possible to present the case, then they showed their results to this posh, snobby Englishwoman who couldn't bear to watch male buffalos f*cking in a field.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

08 Jan 2012, 12:58 pm

I think that the answer is: modern people are against homosexuality because, for some odd reason, ancient Hebrew culture was homophobic.

The ancient Hebrews wanted to distinguish themselves from other ancients. They wouldn't eat pork, probably because their semi-nomadic ancestors lived on sheep and cattle. You can't herd pigs--you need to live in a settled place, and keep your pigs in your yard. When the Hebrews slaughtered the Canaanites, took over their cities and started living a settled existence, why wouldn't they have started raising and eating pigs? Pigs are yummy. No, they just had to be contrarian, and not eat pigs.

They thought that circumcising their penises made them special.

And, they were violently opposed to men having coitus with other men. Probably just to be different.

Lesbianism was cool with the Jews--just no man-on-man stuff.