Page 17 of 20 [ 308 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20  Next

feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

08 Jan 2017, 6:46 pm

Campin_Cat wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Remember that Clinton fought for Universal Healthcare in the 90s. I would have supported not necessarily Warren but Jerry Brown or Biden over Clinton by a wide margin. Tammy Duckworth and John Bel Edwards seem good for 2020.

I would've supported VP Biden's nomination----almost ANYBODY, but Hillary!!



Why?



Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

08 Jan 2017, 6:47 pm

Campin_Cat wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Remember that Clinton fought for Universal Healthcare in the 90s. I would have supported not necessarily Warren but Jerry Brown or Biden over Clinton by a wide margin. Tammy Duckworth and John Bel Edwards seem good for 2020.

I would've supported VP Biden's nomination----almost ANYBODY, but Hillary!!
Why do you dislike Hillary?

Personally I admire her quite a bit.



Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 6:59 pm

Shahunshah wrote:
Its weird that now he wants us to support him.

What's this statement mean, please? (I know it's regarding Bernie.)








_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


Last edited by Campin_Cat on 08 Jan 2017, 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

08 Jan 2017, 7:01 pm

Campin_Cat wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Its weird that now he wants us to support him.

What's this statement mean, please?
I find it hypocritical that Bernie wanted people to support him on the grounds that he is more principled than Hillary. He initially rejected the Brady Bill but later on flip flopped in 2015 to support it.



Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 7:53 pm

adifferentname wrote:
Campin_Cat wrote:
This part is "sticky", for me----cuz, I've never understood when someone uses "monolith", in this regard. An -ist, to me, is someone who lumps lots of people / things together; so, does "monolith" mean, in this regard, something solid from which individual pieces can't be removed (as in, can't separate individual PEOPLE, from the mass)?

Pretty much, yep. It's one thing for (e.g.) black people to come together in unity as a sign of solidarity, but another entirely to tarnish them all as criminal because of the actions of some black people. Identitarians clearly understand this, yet choose to ignore it as it applies to positive traits in the supposedly advantaged group - because they can only be advantaged collectively if you treat them as a collective.

Soooo..... Wait..... Are you saying that Identitarians intentionally don't give black people (as a whole) enough props, when they do GOOD stuff, because that would make them advantaged----yet, they have no problem denigrating an entire race, for the BAD actions of a few, because that will DISadvantage them?



adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

08 Jan 2017, 7:59 pm

Shahunshah wrote:
Hey adifferentname you see women ruled over men but here is the deal.


Could you rephrase that in a way that makes sense?

Quote:
99.9% of women at the time were subjugated to men and Queen Victoria had no power.


99.9% of people were subjugated by men and women of station. That's been the case throughout most of human history. The divide was one of class, not sex. If you'd actually read my posts you might have picked up on that.

Campin_Cat wrote:
Soooo..... Wait..... Are you saying that Identitarians intentionally don't give black people (as a whole) enough props, when they do GOOD stuff, because that would make them advantaged----yet, they have no problem denigrating an entire race, for the BAD actions of a few, because that will DISadvantage them?


Or an entire gender. See above.



Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 8:15 pm

Shahunshah wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
I was talking about this election, if she had put UHC as part of her platform, I might have voted for her.

Bernie generally votes his conscience not necessarily what is popular.
Why should she that would be manipulating the people with an unrealistic promise.

Isn't that a politician's usual MO----and, she's certainly NOT above the rest (politicians), IMO.

Well riddle me this why has Bernie changed his positions from the 90s. Is he flip flopping? If so is he a hypocrite.

Why? Have you never changed your mind, when circumstances changed? There's been alot of changes, in 20 years, in this country.



Mikah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2015
Age: 38
Posts: 3,201
Location: England

08 Jan 2017, 8:40 pm

feral botanist wrote:
Asian privilege, is this all Asians? Do people of Philippino heritage have the same privilege as Korean heritage?


It depends on which statistic you want to analyse. The breakdown is not important to the point I was making though.

feral botanist wrote:
How do you mean ""out performing whites"? In bed? In the Olympics? At poker? That is a vague statement. Please lay out the specifics.


In your original heroic foray into this thread a few pages back, putting to one side the male/female discrepancies, which is a slightly different topic:

feral botanist wrote:
Evertime someone wants to say that the US is not racist, the always site absolute numbers and say, "see, more white people are suffering."


You then fire off the usual whites do better than blacks in XYZ (true) which according to you is a result of racism. Whites using their power of majority nefariously to keep a brotha down. However there are ethnic & cultural groups in the US that do better than whites almost across the board. Google median income by race, crime rates by race and other stats. Off the top of my head I recall Asians-Americans have a higher median income than whites and a lower crime rate, they are killing it in educational achievements too.

Are Asians and Jews privileged? Are they keeping Whites down? If Whites are keeping Black people down, why aren't they using that same magical power on Asians and Jews? It seems obvious that racism is not the answer and other factors are involved. If evil-white-guy theory were true, we'd be on top of EVERYTHING.

In my "crazypants" right wing world (o7 wilburforce) it's obvious: different groups of people are DIFFERENT and will achieve and behave differently. In crazypants left wing world, if you don't ignore the gaping hole in the theory, you then construct a pile of steaming horses**t about the legacy of slavery and something something... oh it's the white mans fault again. Quelle surprise. Figured out your motivations yet? I should rather say, have you figured out what you have been brainwashed into?

Campin_Cat wrote:
EXCELLENT post----ESPECIALLY the part about "your true motivations"; cuz, I was just thinking that it's quite possible that SJWs keep coming-down on white people, so badly, because they're what's easiest / most convenient / most abundant----and, some of us are what's easiest because we are ALLOWING ourselves, to be the patsy. IMO, something similar would be the kid on the playground that's an easy target for bullies, until he starts standin'-up for himself. Now, obviously, it's not THEE same, cuz I'm comparing kids to ADULTS----but then, there doesn't seem to be many adults, nowadays, who don't act like children, if ya know what I mean.


It's certainly true White men have tolerated an extraordinary amount of abuse directed at them and barely raised a whisper of complaint. I think those days are over, thank God.

Campin_Cat wrote:
Sidebar: Haven't seen enough of your posts, lately!


Hehe forum has been a bit slow lately, not much peaking my interest. I pop in to the daily I hate Trump thread now and again.


_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!


Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 8:49 pm

Shahunshah wrote:
Huh well I can kind of see where some of your political beliefs lie. But then again you might just be playing devil's advocate.

Ummm..... IIRC, I don't think I've ever played Devil's Advocate, on WP. I just think very differently, than most; which, rather surprised me, when I got around Aspies----I thought MOST would think very analytically, and consider every angle, possible, regarding a situation / issue / whatever (as I do); but, it seems, very few do that.

Sometimes I just don't know the answer. Often I have simultaneously argued that a significant part of the Republican party is racist but I have also argued the other way.

IMO, it's sorta better that one DOESN'T "know", per se----cuz, I'm thinking that leaves them OPEN (like, to receive other information / ideas); whereas, when someone's like "I absolutely feel 100 PERCENT, about this", it seems to close them off / make them unbendable / unreceiving to another angle / variable / whatever.



Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

08 Jan 2017, 10:15 pm

Darmok wrote:
Why did Trump win? Because of virulent little bigots like this business executive (!) from San Francisco.

Image

Melinda Byerley has more advice on how to be more tolerant of diversity.

Image
Image
I'm sure she mean to include "Christian" too, but there's a 140 character limit you know.


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


Tollorin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

08 Jan 2017, 10:32 pm

Campin_Cat wrote:
^^ LOL That was 10 years ago----dudn't count.

I'm talkin' about 27-years-old being around THIRTY-years-ago, and I'm not the same person I was (think the same way), 30 years ago----and, I think if someone DOES / IS, that's a little sad (IMO, it would seem, then, that they haven't grown, much).


cathylynn wrote:
basically, yes. i think the same way. he was an adult.

That explains alot.

Yes, he was an adult----BUT, he hadn't even been married the FIRST time, yet; and, I'm thinking 3 wives, 5 kids, and 8 grandkids (IIRC), changes a person / their thinking; and, I'm thinking he grew in other ways, as well (as I'm thinking most people do----it's been over 40, for him, since 27).

As for my supporting PE Trump: I didn't even support him with my vote----I AM, however, supporting what I feel is logic; and, saying someone is the same person they were 40+ years ago (thinks the same way), doesn't seem logical to me, as I'M not the same person (don't think the same way), as I was when I was 27.


cathylynn wrote:
a tenet of psychology is that the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.

Well, I am not a supporter of any -ology being an exact science----and, IMO, that's a CROCK (future / past behavior)----and, I'm thinking the average American isn't aware of that "tenet", as you say; and, I'm really glad they aren't, because it seems it would be a hindrance to them ever trying to do better / BE better (a better person).

You're telling me, that because some psychologist(s) sucked this outta their thumb, that no one has the chance of growing, changing, reforming, etc.----that, IMO, is BEYOND sad (that people's chances are taken-away from them).

Trump is saying and writing racist statements, he showed racism in his past behaviors and he's now appoint racists at the head of important governments offices; seem to me that all elements on which we can try to judge his future behavior show that he will be racist. (I know that I go rather far back on the thread...)


_________________
Down with speculators!! !


Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 11:00 pm

feral botanist wrote:
Campin_Cat wrote:
I would've supported VP Biden's nomination----almost ANYBODY, but Hillary!!

Why?

Why, WHICH?

If you meant why "anybody but Hillary": It's because I think Hillary's a SNAKE----I feel she's the type of person who smiles in your face, and then bites you in the butt. I'm thinking she would almost sell her own mother down-the-river, if she thought it would advance her (Hillary), in some way.

If you were asking "why VP Biden"----it's because he seems to shoot from the hip, and I really like that.





_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 11:06 pm

Shahunshah wrote:
Campin_Cat wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
Remember that Clinton fought for Universal Healthcare in the 90s. I would have supported not necessarily Warren but Jerry Brown or Biden over Clinton by a wide margin. Tammy Duckworth and John Bel Edwards seem good for 2020.

I would've supported VP Biden's nomination----almost ANYBODY, but Hillary!!
Why do you dislike Hillary? Personally I admire her quite a bit.

See above.




_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

08 Jan 2017, 11:13 pm

adifferentname wrote:
Campin_Cat wrote:
Soooo..... Wait..... Are you saying that Identitarians intentionally don't give black people (as a whole) enough props, when they do GOOD stuff, because that would make them advantaged----yet, they have no problem denigrating an entire race, for the BAD actions of a few, because that will DISadvantage them?

Or an entire gender. See above.

Okay, I think I see where you're comin'-from, now----PHEW!! THANKS!!




_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

08 Jan 2017, 11:24 pm

Mikah wrote:

feral botanist wrote:
Evertime someone wants to say that the US is not racist, the always site absolute numbers and say, "see, more white people are suffering."


You then fire off the usual whites do better than blacks in XYZ (true) which according to you is a result of racism. Whites using their power of majority nefariously to keep a brotha down. However there are ethnic & cultural groups in the US that do better than whites almost across the board. Google median income by race, crime rates by race and other stats. Off the top of my head I recall Asians-Americans have a higher median income than whites and a lower crime rate, they are killing it in educational achievements too.


And my point was, so what? That does not mean that they do not suffer racial prejudice and it does not negate the fact that most other minority do not have a high mean income. Also, you can not just site some absolute number prove a point comparing to groups of unequal size. You have to compare the rates for each group.

Here is this argument simplified. I have 10,000 pennies. Trump doesn't have that many pennies. I am wealthier that Trump.


Mikah wrote:
Are Asians and Jews privileged? Are they keeping Whites down? If Whites are keeping Black people down, why aren't they using that same magical power on Asians and Jews? It seems obvious that racism is not the answer and other factors are involved. If evil-white-guy theory were true, we'd be on top of EVERYTHING.


why does not Trump and I have the same amount of money? Maybe because we grew up in different families under different conditions.

If Asians (Jews are all you) had been brought here as slaves and treated the same as black people, then we would expect similar conditions, but they have very different histories, even within the groups there is a great deal of heterogeneity.


Mikah wrote:
In my "crazypants" right wing world (o7 wilburforce) it's obvious: different groups of people are DIFFERENT and will achieve and behave differently. In crazypants left wing world, if you don't ignore the gaping hole in the theory, you then construct a pile of steaming horses**t about the legacy of slavery and something something... oh it's the white mans fault again. Quelle surprise. Figured out your motivations yet? I should rather say, have you figured out what you have been brainwashed into?


I am a botanist/ecologist and one of the important concepts to understand when trying restore a degraded site is that it is unlikely to return to the same exact condition or even something similar, because it is starting from a different point.

If you and I were racing and you started a mile away from the finish line and I started 0.5 miles away, would you expect us to cross at the same time?



Mikah wrote:
It's certainly true White men have tolerated an extraordinary amount of abuse directed at them and barely raised a whisper of complaint. I think those days are over, thank God.


All I can say is that you need to spend more time with other people and try to understand things from their perspective, because this idea is divorced from reality.

I was in the army when a lot of the big issue with race and sex were being dealt with for the 3rd or 4th time(not the last), and you saw all of these white males feeling oppressed because they could make fun of black people and getting all whiny because they could sexually harass women.

If you think men, particularly white men are oppressed...I am not even sure what to say other than you must come from some privileged world where you do not have to mix with the lessor folk.

I do like the crazypants name, should we call you that from now on? If not I will take it.



Shahunshah
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,225
Location: NZ

09 Jan 2017, 1:03 am

Campin_Cat wrote:
Shahunshah wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
I was talking about this election, if she had put UHC as part of her platform, I might have voted for her.

Bernie generally votes his conscience not necessarily what is popular.
Why should she that would be manipulating the people with an unrealistic promise.

Isn't that a politician's usual MO----and, she's certainly NOT above the rest (politicians), IMO.

Well riddle me this why has Bernie changed his positions from the 90s. Is he flip flopping? If so is he a hypocrite.

Why? Have you never changed your mind, when circumstances changed? There's been alot of changes, in 20 years, in this country.

Bernie Sanders was using the flip flopping or Hillary to criticize her. The point I am trying to make is that Bernie Sanders can't really call himself the better candidate in that regard since he has done those exact same things.