JohnPowell wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
JohnPowell wrote:
No Bill. America was based on genocide and slavery.
Slavery and genocide were the past sins of America that we are still trying to atone for. Because our country is based on the ideals of liberty and equality, we are able to face those original sins head on, and try to rectify them.
Atoning for by destroying numerous countries across the world, some in Africa? Please cut the crap.
US involvement in Angola certainly wasn't atoning, it was proxy war that prolonged the civil war by at least a decade. Also it goes against "for oil" argument as they were going to loose out on what is the second biggest oil field in sub-Saharan Africa, which they have the contract now.
I also think that Vietnam was one of the bigger mistakes along with Iraq. However fortunately thing are on the up with Vietnam relations, they have better relations with the US than they do with China, of which there is no love lost.
However we should put things in their proper historical context, you could use similar anti-colonial rhetoric against the American as you could with Turks.
I think idea of atoning for historical ills is itself problematic, and like you say it can cause more harm than good. I say take Vietnam's example and move on. Whist I don't agree with Japan's historical denialism, Hiroshima was bad enough and they way they picked themselves up and rebuilt is admirable.
If we take the US involvement in the middle east that is one century out of thirteen of sectarian conflicts in the region.
The British as a colonial power was quite late into the middle east, it was only due to the fallout of the Ottoman empire.
China is probably the one to look out for the newest imperial power. Both in commercial land banking, and territory claims.
These interventions aren't mistakes. The following carnage is intentional.