Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

What is Gods Disorder

Page 3 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Previous topic | Next topic

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

09 Sep 2009, 2:06 am

DentArthurDent wrote:
bdhkhsfgk wrote:

....the reason why god comes off as cold is the fact that he has the most insane responsibility and has done many things he regrets.....


So you agree with Sands original summation of God, the dude has gone nuts


Or was always so. Only a crazy would invent of world of things just to worship him. It is like a solopsist looking for the approval of Others.

ruveyn



bdhkhsfgk
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 May 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,450

09 Sep 2009, 2:25 am

I agree with both of you above me, I think he has turned insane due to the fact having the worst life possible, he has created many humans during the ages to worship him, but the thing i don't understand is that; I think the bible stopped being written in around 1500 or something, maybe long before that, the people that heard him speak were complete schizophrenic, they heard nothing, only things they imagined, that's why they stopped writing in it, nobody hears him anymore, nobody says on the tv, radio, INTERNET; "God has something he will say", if he existed, he would have spokemon long ago. Nobody hears god now, only schizophrenincs.



Last edited by bdhkhsfgk on 09 Sep 2009, 2:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Plotinus
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

User avatar

Joined: 6 Sep 2009
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 82
Location: Sri Lanka

09 Sep 2009, 2:29 am

Have a look at neoplatonism: the universe is a result of emanation of the impersonal One. No creation.
No one to worship.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 100
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

09 Sep 2009, 2:51 am

Plotinus wrote:
Have a look at neoplatonism: the universe is a result of emanation of the impersonal One. No creation.
No one to worship.


A quick look at Neoplatonism as described in Wikipedia presents it as one of the more amusingly insane diversions of someone determined to establish that basic knowledge is unknowable and thereby not pursuable. Not a very pragmatic discipline.