The most ridiculous thing about humans

Post Reply New Topic

Humans work teleologically because they have a conscious mind. Nature does not.. Teleologic requires an objective to be attained. Nature has no such objective. Thinking is fundamentally a form of filtration. When a human seeks a solution to a problem he or she visualizes all sorts of abstract solutions depending upon experience and mentally tries them out and perhaps visualizes one that might be a solution. Then the solution is attempted in actuality and either succeeds or fails. If it fails the human tries again until one succeeds. In nature when an organism meets a condition that gives it problems it reproduces and produces variations of itself. Natural conditions either permit it to live or destroys it. If the destruction is not total, further reproductions produce further actual attempts at solutions and if one succeeds the problem is solved. But there is no teleology involved. There is no attempt to succeed by the organism with a goal in mind. It merely mindlessly keeps producing variations and natural forces keep attempting to destroy the variations with no sense of attempting success. Nature simply doesn't care one way or the other. Nevertheless, since solutions are produced it is a process of filtration in some relationship to human thinking.

Xenophobia is one of the instincts that keeps us safe in a tribal situation. A stranger may be an outcast criminal, a scout for an invasion, or just someone whose culture accidentally makes them prone to be offended or offensive. This hard-wired caution is often too strong to overcome logic. Racism is also taught in many families, and is self-perpetuating, leading to low information exchange and prejudiced observations. Even if someone takes a logical approach to life, there is often not enough time to evaluate people as individuals, especially if there are few exceptions to a racially based class structure.

my mind is where in nature i can confirm that consciousness does occur. i do not know for certain of any 'external' occurrences of consciousness.
nature, as a whole, does not seem capable of declaring an objective, yes.
i do not disagree. i read ruveyn's post out of context and so my post is fairly senseless in relation, but i did not mean the point that you intend here to refute.

/thread