20 Nov 2010, 1:32 pm
20 Nov 2010, 1:35 pm
20 Nov 2010, 1:47 pm
Nambo wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
@Nambo: I think the Nazis win at evil, on account of all that genocide and holocaust thing. And before that old chestnut about British concentration camps pops out: That's CONCENTRATION not DEATH camp. Two different things, until the Nazis started to turn the former into the latter.
Actually, I think its the communists that win at evil, they where responsible for the deaths of 20 million Christians, and they discovered rather than "gassing" the victims first, it was easier to just bury them alive.
Next on the list comes the Americans, do some research on what the Americans did to the Germans in thier camps after the war, whereas Auchwitz had barracks, food, a swimming pool, a theatre, a brothel, the Americans rounded Germans up, millions of them, left them exposed in a field with no food, no water, no shelter, no room to even lie down, covered in diarria, drinking urine until they died a slow and horrible death.
And this was after the war had ended!
The British and Canadians treated the Germans well but not the Americans.
Churchill however, he rivals Hitler in his evilness, Churchill developed antrax with the intention of wiping out every German man, women and child, fortunately parliament stopped him, he also developed the modern day practice of bringing warfare to civilians when he started bombing people in thier homes, Germany didnt even have any 4 engined bombers as such a wicked enterprise was against thier morality, I read a book about the Spitfire once, its first kill was against a German bomber that was to attack a British warship, but the german bomber was to only attack if that ship was at sea, for fear of harming civilians if at port.
And dont even talk about Dresden, or the American Mustangs the following morning who flew along the river strafing the nurses and patients they had managed to rescue, or the elephants escaped from the zoo.
As for the "Holocaust", did you know Hitler wanted the Jews removed from Germany, especially as international Judaism had declared war on Germany in 1933, so Hitler wanted them out,l just as England had them banned for 400 years until Cromwell brought them back, but the Zionist West, wanting a Jewish sacrifice in order to get back thier "promised land" refused to take them, leaving them in Germany to face the persecution of Hitler, research the Kinder Transport and how Germany wanted all the Jewish children and thier parents out, but England would only take 10,000 of them, and charged Germany £50 a child to look after them.
Firstly, who mentioned Communists? You suggested Britain was more evil than the Nazis, I called BS. Whether the Communists killed more people is totally irrelevant to that. In a competition for Ultimate Twat fought between the Uk and Nazi Germany, Germany wins. No Communists involved.
Second: The same applies to the Americans. So what if the Americans failed to provide nice clean well-lit camps for the Germans? Its not relevant to the comparison between the UK and Germany. And if I'm perfectly honest, I couldn't care less if the Americans saw fit to treat their German prisoners with little or no respect. The Germans should be considered lucky that the Allied soldiers who discovered the Death Camps didn't simply execute them on the spot. And a badly run Internment camp is still not anywhere near the same thing as industrialised slaughter.
Auschwitz had a swimming pool? Utterly risible revisionist BS. Who got to use the pool then? Was it by chance the SS officers and staff who lived on site? Auschwitz had some rather nice little cabins with (properly) working showers and armchairs and dining tables with crockery. Did the Untermensch get to sit in those on a cold night, warming their feet against the lovely log fire, whilst enjoying a nice cup of bracing hot tea? No. They slept on straw in the barracks, if they were lucky enough to not get herded straight into a gas-chamber. A brothel? Food? Get your brain in gear. You're not describing a branch of Pontins. Its a DEATH CAMP. It existed solely to cleanse the world of "jewish vermin" in as efficient a manner as possible.
Germany didn't have any four engined bombers because four-engined Strategic bombers didn't fit into Luftwaffe doctrine, and its ridiculous that you think they are a "wicked" enterprise. If you read a book about a spitfire once, then you should be fully aware of what Germany did with its air-force, four engines or not. The Luftwaffe did more than enough damage with its smaller aircraft that such a f*****g stupid moral position is absolutely ludicrous and in no way backed up by historical fact. Not to mention the huge list of 4-engined (or more) craft that the Luftwaffe intended to build. Four-engined bombers? I give you the doodle-bug. An totally indiscriminate explosive-carrier and terror weapon. Or its follower, the V2, even MORE indiscriminate and even more explosive. targeted almost exclusively at London. A city. Full of civilians.
Again. what American pilots choose to do of a morning is f**k all to do with the Evil (or lack thereof) of the Empire.
Churchill didn't "develop Anthrax". Churchill asked for an in-depth study into gas weapons as potential weapon against Germany, and why Germany had resisted its use in turn. The relevant authorities responded that in the former case, Gas would probably extend the war and disadvantage the allies, and in the latter, Germany feared that the retaliation against them would be too great if they deployed gas weapons.
As for "International Judaism" declaring war on Germany.. you don;t half talk some bollocks. You have the smell of StormFront and neo-nazi revisionist BS about you. "Auschwitz had a swimming pool."
20 Nov 2010, 3:35 pm
20 Nov 2010, 4:01 pm
20 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
ruveyn wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Next on the list comes the Americans, do some research on what the Americans did to the Germans in thier camps after the war, whereas Auchwitz had barracks, food, a swimming pool, a theatre, a brothel, the Americans rounded Germans up, millions of them, left them exposed in a field with no food, no water, no shelter, no room to even lie down, covered in diarria, drinking urine until they died a slow and horrible death.
And this was after the war had ended!
The British and Canadians treated the Germans well but not the Americans.
Documentation and proof please. You made a blatant unsupported accusation. Now back it up with some proof.
ruveyn
MacBeth didnt write that, I did.
The proof is exactly the same proof as the Jewish Holocaust, eye witness accounts.
But Ive allready done my research on all sides of WW2 history.If you are really interested, Iam sure you could do the same.
Heres a few books you might like to read, or at least read the reviews.
On this one, you can see the photograph on the cover of the American guarding the allied death camps, a lot of this information has recently been released following the 50 year rule on secret documents.
Gruesome Harvest
After the Reich
Crimes and mercies
A terrible revenge
Further than this, 1st hand knowledge from my own family history where we had to flee West Prussia after the first world war, that is before Hitler came along, to flee the terrible attrocities Jewish Poles where inflicting on Germanic Prussians following West Prussia being given to Poland after the treaty of Versallies. German Babies being nailed to barns etc, I have plenty of pictures of the mass graves the Germans found when they invaded Poland.
See, they hoped we where all dead, not around to give both sides of the story.
20 Nov 2010, 4:10 pm
20 Nov 2010, 4:25 pm
20 Nov 2010, 4:46 pm
Nambo wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Next on the list comes the Americans, do some research on what the Americans did to the Germans in thier camps after the war, whereas Auchwitz had barracks, food, a swimming pool, a theatre, a brothel, the Americans rounded Germans up, millions of them, left them exposed in a field with no food, no water, no shelter, no room to even lie down, covered in diarria, drinking urine until they died a slow and horrible death.
And this was after the war had ended!
The British and Canadians treated the Germans well but not the Americans.
Documentation and proof please. You made a blatant unsupported accusation. Now back it up with some proof.
ruveyn
MacBeth didnt write that, I did.
The proof is exactly the same proof as the Jewish Holocaust, eye witness accounts.
But Ive allready done my research on all sides of WW2 history.If you are really interested, Iam sure you could do the same.
Heres a few books you might like to read, or at least read the reviews.
On this one, you can see the photograph on the cover of the American guarding the allied death camps, a lot of this information has recently been released following the 50 year rule on secret documents.
Gruesome Harvest
After the Reich
Crimes and mercies
A terrible revenge
Further than this, 1st hand knowledge from my own family history where we had to flee West Prussia after the first world war, that is before Hitler came along, to flee the terrible attrocities Jewish Poles where inflicting on Germanic Prussians following West Prussia being given to Poland after the treaty of Versallies. German Babies being nailed to barns etc, I have plenty of pictures of the mass graves the Germans found when they invaded Poland.
See, they hoped we where all dead, not around to give both sides of the story.
Great picture. A mass grave. Which could be any grave almost anywhere in Europe. Still sounds like revisionist BS. No doubt Adolf was just liberating the poor oppressed Prussians from the evil baby-burning Juden eh? Funny that, because as I recall, the Poles were never particularly pro-jew themselves. Someone in your family appears to be heavily into historical revision and ..well.. making things up, frankly.
20 Nov 2010, 4:56 pm
20 Nov 2010, 5:13 pm
20 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm
20 Nov 2010, 7:46 pm
20 Nov 2010, 7:52 pm
20 Nov 2010, 8:19 pm
20 Nov 2010, 8:39 pm
