Religion-Based Government
Atheism is not a religion, Scythe
Okay, so if our rights don't come from some fictional omnipotent being than the chances are greater that non-fictional Humans can take them away?
Look at the various theocracies in the world (past and present). Since they recognize that "Rights come from God/s", and the government is representative of this divine figure, they [the government] exercise the sole authority to take your rights in the name of religion. The government ultimately holds the guns and all the cards. Society will be considerably less free than a secular one simply for the fact that the theocratic government can claim whatever they want about the religion and dissent would be viewed as heresy. Your thesis falls apart when you look at reality
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
This is why our right to bear arms is so important.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
This is why our right to bear arms is so important.
And why it is not really about hunting and defense from crime.
It is about defense from the law.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Last edited by JakobVirgil on 11 Oct 2011, 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Just to add more to this discussion, here is a link to an article by a man named David Straker: "Seven Rules of Religion". It seems to be copyrighted material, so I can not post it here in its entirety. Please look over the original text, as it covers the following topics:
1. Distant Ideals
2. Canonical Texts
3. Interpreters of the Word
4. Sin & Salvation
5. Rituals of Commitment & Transformation
6. Rules for Living
7. Insiders Versus Outsiders
I've found this article useful in all of my discussions with religious people, especially those who adhere to the Abramic religions and their offshoots.
Enjoy!
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
1. Distant Ideals
2. Canonical Texts
3. Interpreters of the Word
4. Sin & Salvation
5. Rituals of Commitment & Transformation
6. Rules for Living
7. Insiders Versus Outsiders
I've found this article useful in all of my discussions with religious people, especially those who adhere to the Abramic religions and their offshoots.
Enjoy!
Abrmaic religions will always be the most popular
Abrmaic religions will always be the most popular
No, the proposition that Abrahamic religions will always be the most deadly, is easily verified by careful examination of history. (Abrmaic is also a frequent cross-cipher for Lucifer). Deadly religions seem the most popular when all the unpopular distractors are eliminated, namely, executions for recognizing other Gods, then often deadly punishents for the non-canonical worship of the remaining Mono-God.
"God Against The Gods: The History of the War Between Monotheism and Polytheism" by Jonathan Kirsch (2005) provides an excellent introduction that is fairly eye-opening to the often tunnelled vision of popular histories.
Tadzio
jrjones9933
Veteran
Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage
I put down "no religion" before I even spotted Pastafarianism... shucks.
_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade
How very odd ... "No Religion" is not an option.
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
A secular government based on Judeo-Christian values seems to actually be the best way to go. Principles that everyone has inalienable rights given to them by God, as pointed out in our Declaration of Independence for example.
Which as far as I know doesn't say anything about inalienable rights whatsoever.
Well actually I can't really attack this on the outcome of what he suggets at least. Secular statism I will say is not a christian doctrine, but then again who am I to complain that he comes to a reasonable conclusion?
That's why I voted Other.
Well I guess this point does appear in the constitution.
This is fine, but it is ironic because in the bible it talks about slavery in a very acceptable fashion.
That's quite the most insulting charge I have ever haid laid against me or anyone of my persuasion. Care to justify that?
Any Atheist is capable of justifying slavery just as well as any Theist. It might even be easier - consider Commie China, it's Atheist policies, and the news reports of Chinese sweatshop slavery being used to make cheap goods for export.
All you'd have to do here is abolish the Thirteenth Amendment ...
_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.
Oodain
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Abrmaic religions will always be the most popular
No, the proposition that Abrahamic religions will always be the most deadly, is easily verified by careful examination of history. (Abrmaic is also a frequent cross-cipher for Lucifer). Deadly religions seem the most popular when all the unpopular distractors are eliminated, namely, executions for recognizing other Gods, then often deadly punishents for the non-canonical worship of the remaining Mono-God.
"God Against The Gods: The History of the War Between Monotheism and Polytheism" by Jonathan Kirsch (2005) provides an excellent introduction that is fairly eye-opening to the often tunnelled vision of popular histories.
Tadzio
No beleiving in nothing is the most deadly if you compare the body count athiests have.
Caused more death to the world then Abrahamic religions all because we believe in God they kill us.
I would rather live my life by believeing in God having a set of morals and ethics to live by.
To believe in nothing at all is the most selfish belief their is and does more harm to the world.
You bring up the history of things that have happened in the past because of Abrahamic religions but havent said the good Jews Muslims and Christians have done.
We have a history of doing wrong and evil things but thats not how most of us are today btw t
The Holocaust was casued by Adolf Hitler and he didn't believe in God.
Joesph Stalin Pol Pot Benito Mussolini and Napoleon Bonaparte all killed memmbers of the Abrahamic religions by using genocide.
Show me when in past history have abrahamic religions ever used geneocide against non believers in God?
Lucifer means Light-bearer or Light-bringer.
To generalize us all in one group is a bit extreme my faith is unshakeable I pride myself on my religion.
Got a link?
When did anything even remotely similar to this happen?
God or religion is not a requirement for having ethics and morals.
You're talking about nihilism here, not atheism.
You're more than welcome to make a list of every little good deed any member of those religions has done.
All it takes are a few with the means to make an impact.
Hitler was a Christian and the nazi's went by the motto "Gott mit uns" (God with us).
They killed many others aswell. They were very bad men.
Read your bible.
Pride comes before the fall.
_________________
Chances are, if you're offended by something I said, it was an attempt at humour.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Got a link?
When did anything even remotely similar to this happen?
God or religion is not a requirement for having ethics and morals.
I never said it did but I like the morals and ethics of my religion.
You're talking about nihilism here, not atheism.
Atheists only believe in evoultion if evoultion is real why have we stopped evolving?
ou bring up the history of things that have happened in the past because of Abrahamic religions but havent said the good Jews Muslims and Christians have done.
You're more than welcome to make a list of every little good deed any member of those religions has done.
That might take a while for me to do I am sure the list is very high.
All it takes are a few with the means to make an impact.
If thats true then if one black or white man robs you will you dislke them all as a group?
Hitler was a Christian and the nazi's went by the motto "Gott mit uns" (God with us).
Hitler was not a Christian he believed in the Occult the naz's used that motto for propaganda.
They killed many others aswell. They were very bad men.
At least you did acknowlege that they killed Jews Muslims and Christians.
Read your bible.
I do read my bible their is plenty of accounts of war between the israelites and their enemies but that isn't geneocide.
Pride comes before the fall.
But I am still standing.
Apparently, a matter of perspective
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
