Something's a bit out of balance here.
MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland
marshall wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
well we do have to live amongst them even if we don't choose to. It's not like they turn on TV and get a conservative view, or watch pop culture and get a conservative view, or go to college or high school and get a conservative view. Life is so easy for them, they just hear themselves echoed in Time magazine, or the NYTimes or by Bill Maher, and think that thats just the way reality is.
I don't watch TV.
Well that's fine if you don't watch TV, but you can get your sides viewpoint going to high school, college, standing in line at the checkout counter and having Time, Newsweek right in front of you, you see it reconfirmed by every Liberal around you as liberals very often do not have conservative friends. LIberals don't marry conservatives, either.
Pew has done a study and discovers that Liberals are more likely to be ideologically pure as far as their friends on social media goes. They ban comments, or straight up cut you from their network.
Gallup has done a study where they note Liberals are more comfortable with mainstream media, upwards of 60%, whereas conservatives only 30% of conservatives don't think the media is biased and reports accurately.
marshall wrote:
Quote:
The Obama administration gets away with what they get away with because they have good intentions, unlike the republicans who kill and starve people discriminately. And... the ends justify the means. There are bigger goals that we have to achieve, the thinking goes, and the morality of those goals are so great that we cannot let hypocrisy, immorality, and civil liberties get in our way of achieving them.
Meaning well, only hearing the world around them echoed to them, and having the ends justify the means pervades much of the left's behavior.
Meaning well, only hearing the world around them echoed to them, and having the ends justify the means pervades much of the left's behavior.
What a load of un-reflective crap. The ends justify the means for neocons as well when it comes to using bombs to spread "freedom" around the world. Lets just say the left and right put different weights on different ends and leave it at that. Not letting people die due to lack of affordable healthcare is simply unimportant to conservatives while showing the world your military might is extremely important. For the left it is the reverse. It seems we both see the others priorities as screwed up and immoral and it's based on a conflict of values, not reasoning. The reality is we have an intractable moral impasse, which is what makes politics so vicious today.
No, because that is the only way the Left can square supporting movements that have wiped out more then 100,000,000 human beings. The Right cannot be noble, in their eyes, so though evil is squarely weighted on our end, what moral equivalent can we attribute to them? Attend college. My Professor the other day made the comparison between the Bengahzi terrorists and the preacher in Florida who wanted to burn a Koran. One is burning a stupid book, the other is the loss of lives, but one of the same to one on the Left. They have their abortion clinic bombers, so they can't speak about our terrorists.
Our Military maintaining the world's stable energy and trade market is what brought 4 billion people out of poverty. We are the engine of growth that spurred pretty much all of that, and our standard of living is owed entirely to a stable world where nations are not warring at each other but participating in the markets and rising out of poverty. Which was a great task to achieve considering how low collectivists religions degraded the living standards of much of the world.
The GOP objection to health care is the governmental control of the market, and the Obama's administrations Leftwing approach to it: Coverage, instead of Cost. The Obama administration doesn't necessarily have "misplaced" priorities... they just have "Left-wing" priorities. Equality is the governing value. It is not fair that 15% does not have health care, so instead of lowering costs for the 85% who do have health care so that the market is affordable enough to accept the 15% who are without it, we will raise coverage so that risk is diversified in our nationalized pool of participants, and that the 85% will cover the 15%, and make a more equal system. Equality is the aim of the Left with regards to health care. It is the minority and compassion that governs every policy that comes from that end of the spectrum.
_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.
Oodain
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
you are full of yourself,
america certainly had a role to play in an international economy but were the united states army to disapear tomorrow there would still exist free trade.
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
DancingDanny wrote:
That's a different argument. That isn't making a case for conservatives having pure thoughts and that impure conservatives are just liberals wearing the clothing.
I wasn't actually addressing Raptor's purity of thought argument, he just happened to have the quote I wanted to use in his signature and I acknowledged that. I was responding to the OP, and explaining some of why it is that liberals annoy me *slightly* more than conservatives, a topic I've spoken of before. I'm not going to make a case for conservativism as I'm not a conservative, I just happen to enjoy arguing against aspects of liberalism, especially when it tries to claim unearned high grounds.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
MarketAndChurch wrote:
marshall wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
well we do have to live amongst them even if we don't choose to. It's not like they turn on TV and get a conservative view, or watch pop culture and get a conservative view, or go to college or high school and get a conservative view. Life is so easy for them, they just hear themselves echoed in Time magazine, or the NYTimes or by Bill Maher, and think that thats just the way reality is.
I don't watch TV.
Well that's fine if you don't watch TV, but you can get your sides viewpoint going to high school, college, standing in line at the checkout counter and having Time, Newsweek right in front of you, you see it reconfirmed by every Liberal around you as liberals very often do not have conservative friends. LIberals don't marry conservatives, either.
Pew has done a study and discovers that Liberals are more likely to be ideologically pure as far as their friends on social media goes. They ban comments, or straight up cut you from their network.
Gallup has done a study where they note Liberals are more comfortable with mainstream media, upwards of 60%, whereas conservatives only 30% of conservatives don't think the media is biased and reports accurately.
Whatever. Where I live there's no absolutely no shortage of conservatives. Grand Rapids is practically owned by a few families of deeply conservative rich folk. I can't recall how much the Amways' and Devos' donated to the repugs. Things are changing with the younger generations but the old school culture of West Michigan is still all about dour stern Calvinism. If you are rich you are part of God's "elect" and are being rewarded for your thrift and enterprising spirit. On the other hand, if you are poor God is punishing you for being a moocher. There is no end to crusty old rich conservatives bitching about "Obamacare" and fearing that their taxes are going to go up.
Quote:
marshall wrote:
Quote:
The Obama administration gets away with what they get away with because they have good intentions, unlike the republicans who kill and starve people discriminately. And... the ends justify the means. There are bigger goals that we have to achieve, the thinking goes, and the morality of those goals are so great that we cannot let hypocrisy, immorality, and civil liberties get in our way of achieving them.
Meaning well, only hearing the world around them echoed to them, and having the ends justify the means pervades much of the left's behavior.
Meaning well, only hearing the world around them echoed to them, and having the ends justify the means pervades much of the left's behavior.
What a load of un-reflective crap. The ends justify the means for neocons as well when it comes to using bombs to spread "freedom" around the world. Lets just say the left and right put different weights on different ends and leave it at that. Not letting people die due to lack of affordable healthcare is simply unimportant to conservatives while showing the world your military might is extremely important. For the left it is the reverse. It seems we both see the others priorities as screwed up and immoral and it's based on a conflict of values, not reasoning. The reality is we have an intractable moral impasse, which is what makes politics so vicious today.
No, because that is the only way the Left can square supporting movements that have wiped out more then 100,000,000 human beings. The Right cannot be noble, in their eyes, so though evil is squarely weighted on our end, what moral equivalent can we attribute to them? Attend college. My Professor the other day made the comparison between the Bengahzi terrorists and the preacher in Florida who wanted to burn a Koran. One is burning a stupid book, the other is the loss of lives, but one of the same to one on the Left. They have their abortion clinic bombers, so they can't speak about our terrorists.
The point isn't that extremists on opposite ends are morally equivalent. The point is that two wrongs don't make a right. I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
Quote:
Our Military maintaining the world's stable energy and trade market is what brought 4 billion people out of poverty. We are the engine of growth that spurred pretty much all of that, and our standard of living is owed entirely to a stable world where nations are not warring at each other but participating in the markets and rising out of poverty. Which was a great task to achieve considering how low collectivists religions degraded the living standards of much of the world.
This just doesn't line up with reality. It's an overly simplistic, arrogant, and self-congratulatory view that insults even our allies. Capitalism has proven itself triumphant but it is also true that pro-market governments and trade organizations have overstepped at times, trampled people's rights, and even worsened poverty. The only justification I ever hear from conservatives is "well, communism is worse, look at North Korea". Sorry, but the world isn't that black and white. Not all socialist governments were as abusive as the very worst cases.
Quote:
The GOP objection to health care is the governmental control of the market, and the Obama's administrations Leftwing approach to it: Coverage, instead of Cost. The Obama administration doesn't necessarily have "misplaced" priorities... they just have "Left-wing" priorities. Equality is the governing value. It is not fair that 15% does not have health care, so instead of lowering costs for the 85% who do have health care so that the market is affordable enough to accept the 15% who are without it, we will raise coverage so that risk is diversified in our nationalized pool of participants, and that the 85% will cover the 15%, and make a more equal system. Equality is the aim of the Left with regards to health care. It is the minority and compassion that governs every policy that comes from that end of the spectrum.
It's not about equality, it's about preventing suffering. Saying everyone should be able to afford basic coverage is not the same as saying everyone should have the same size house or the same size bank account. That the right contorts basic survival needs with luxuries is pretty damn insulting to those who suffer. The mainstream American "Left" is not about absolute equality. We have a few utopian Marxists on this board but they are far outside the mainstream. The mainstream American "Left" is about maintaining some provisions to meet the minimal needs so that fewer people suffer. American conservatives are pretty much out in loony land compared to the rest of the world in terms of what minimal things they expect from government. American conservatives are stuck in the 19th century.
marshall wrote:
[
I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
A bit???? When was the last time a group of Christian fundies hijack an airline flight and crashed it into a tall building full of innocent folk? When was the last time a Christian fundie strapped on explosives and blew himself and innocent people up?
Christians stopped being bad-a** sometime in the 18th century. Muslim extremists have been going at it for 1400 years.
ruveyn
ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
[
I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
A bit???? When was the last time a group of Christian fundies hijack an airline flight and crashed it into a tall building full of innocent folk? When was the last time a Christian fundie strapped on explosives and blew himself and innocent people up?
Christians stopped being bad-a** sometime in the 18th century. Muslim extremists have been going at it for 1400 years.
ruveyn
And your solution, nuke them all. Am I right?
marshall wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
marshall wrote:
[
I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
I think most sane people will agree Al Qaeda terrorists are a bit more extreme than Christian fundamentalists living the US. The existence of violent Islamic fundamentalists doesn't justify hating and fearing every single Muslim on the planet.
A bit???? When was the last time a group of Christian fundies hijack an airline flight and crashed it into a tall building full of innocent folk? When was the last time a Christian fundie strapped on explosives and blew himself and innocent people up?
Christians stopped being bad-a** sometime in the 18th century. Muslim extremists have been going at it for 1400 years.
ruveyn
And your solution, nuke them all. Am I right?
It is a solution, but it is not a good solution. To be truthful, I do not know a practical way of ridding mankind of the plague of Islam. What do you propose?
ruveyn
Dox47 wrote:
Raptor's Buckley quote probably says it best:
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Though the mentioned attitude is not universal among liberals, it is common enough to make criticizing them a far more satisfying endeavor, as they often are truly shocked that any thinking person could disagree with them. If you happen to be an educated and articulate person who can back up your disagreements with both logic and rhetoric, then the fun just grows and grows. Look at the refusal of many Democrats to admit any of Obama's faults, even well known and unambiguously odious ones like his selectively secret kill list and crackdown on whistle-blowers. This sort of willful ignorance/self deception would be bad enough coming from anyone, but when it comes from people who continuously claim to own both the moral and intellectual high ground? That type of hypocrisy deserves, no demands, a strong slap down. Which I am more than happy to provide, on occasion.
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Though the mentioned attitude is not universal among liberals, it is common enough to make criticizing them a far more satisfying endeavor, as they often are truly shocked that any thinking person could disagree with them. If you happen to be an educated and articulate person who can back up your disagreements with both logic and rhetoric, then the fun just grows and grows. Look at the refusal of many Democrats to admit any of Obama's faults, even well known and unambiguously odious ones like his selectively secret kill list and crackdown on whistle-blowers. This sort of willful ignorance/self deception would be bad enough coming from anyone, but when it comes from people who continuously claim to own both the moral and intellectual high ground? That type of hypocrisy deserves, no demands, a strong slap down. Which I am more than happy to provide, on occasion.
The "thought purity" thing was more in jest, of course.
The Buckley quote, however, is not in jest because that reflects my experience with most liberals.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
thomas81
Veteran
Joined: 2 May 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,147
Location: County Down, Northern Ireland
ruveyn wrote:
It is a solution, but it is not a good solution. To be truthful, I do not know a practical way of ridding mankind of the plague of Islam. What do you propose?
ruveyn
ruveyn
There was once a Austrian fellow who tried to rid the mankind of a religious denomination through the construction of segregated villages and airtight cabins with hatches for the despatch of zyklone b gas pellets.
What say we give that a go?
Ironically the Gaza strip is already little more than a massive concentration camp.
Marshall wrote:
Quote:
Whatever. Where I live there's no absolutely no shortage of conservatives. Grand Rapids is practically owned by a few families of deeply conservative rich folk. I can't recall how much the Amways' and Devos' donated to the repugs. Things are changing with the younger generations but the old school culture of West Michigan is still all about dour stern Calvinism. If you are rich you are part of God's "elect" and are being rewarded for your thrift and enterprising spirit. On the other hand, if you are poor God is punishing you for being a moocher. There is no end to crusty old rich conservatives bitching about "Obamacare" and fearing that their taxes are going to go up.
Although I’m not a Calvinist I’d really hate to see this country become totally bereft of “dour stern Calvinism”…….
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Raptor wrote:
Marshall wrote:
Although I’m not a Calvinist I’d really hate to see this country become totally bereft of “dour stern Calvinism”…….
Quote:
Whatever. Where I live there's no absolutely no shortage of conservatives. Grand Rapids is practically owned by a few families of deeply conservative rich folk. I can't recall how much the Amways' and Devos' donated to the repugs. Things are changing with the younger generations but the old school culture of West Michigan is still all about dour stern Calvinism. If you are rich you are part of God's "elect" and are being rewarded for your thrift and enterprising spirit. On the other hand, if you are poor God is punishing you for being a moocher. There is no end to crusty old rich conservatives bitching about "Obamacare" and fearing that their taxes are going to go up.
Although I’m not a Calvinist I’d really hate to see this country become totally bereft of “dour stern Calvinism”…….
You should move to West Michigan then. If you're from the south you'll have to get used to our dour stern weather as well though. The long dark cloudy winters inspire the drear and crotchety republican voters who threaten small children with their rifle for accidentally wandering onto their property.
marshall wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Marshall wrote:
Although I’m not a Calvinist I’d really hate to see this country become totally bereft of “dour stern Calvinism”…….
Quote:
Whatever. Where I live there's no absolutely no shortage of conservatives. Grand Rapids is practically owned by a few families of deeply conservative rich folk. I can't recall how much the Amways' and Devos' donated to the repugs. Things are changing with the younger generations but the old school culture of West Michigan is still all about dour stern Calvinism. If you are rich you are part of God's "elect" and are being rewarded for your thrift and enterprising spirit. On the other hand, if you are poor God is punishing you for being a moocher. There is no end to crusty old rich conservatives bitching about "Obamacare" and fearing that their taxes are going to go up.
Although I’m not a Calvinist I’d really hate to see this country become totally bereft of “dour stern Calvinism”…….
You should move to West Michigan then. If you're from the south you'll have to get used to our dour stern weather as well. The long dark cloudy winters inspire the drear and crotchety republican voters who threaten small children with their rifle for accidentally wandering onto their property.
I live in the southeast I'm not from it as I've said before. I've wintered in a colder place than Michigan so I know stern weather when I'm in it. Besides, plenty of places in the south have cold winters and snow. Spend some time in the Blue Ridge Mountains in the dead of winter and tell me how warm and tropical it is. Remember to pack your skis.
Apparently cold dreary winters spawn democrats since all of the northeast and Midwest/great lakes are all blue states. The only exception is Indiana, bless their souls.
PS: If you'd stop trespassing on your neighbor's property he wouldn't have to threaten you with his rifle.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
