Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Fembots

Page 3 of 3 [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Previous topic | Next topic

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

07 Aug 2013, 9:51 pm

Shau wrote:
[MRA nutjob] BUT GUYS, THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT OPPOSE FEMBOTS ARE WOMEN SEEKING TO MAINTAIN THEIR SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BETA MALES VIA THEIR WITHHOLDING OF SEXUAL ACCESS. IF BETA MALES OBTAIN ACCESS TO CHEAP AND EASY p****, THEY'LL LOSE THE ONE THING GIVING THEM POWER. [/nutjob]


good point.



redriverronin
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 23 Dec 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 267

08 Aug 2013, 1:25 am

Shau wrote:
[MRA nutjob] BUT GUYS, THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT OPPOSE FEMBOTS ARE WOMEN SEEKING TO MAINTAIN THEIR SOCIAL CONTROL OVER BETA MALES VIA THEIR WITHHOLDING OF SEXUAL ACCESS. IF BETA MALES OBTAIN ACCESS TO CHEAP AND EASY p****, THEY'LL LOSE THE ONE THING GIVING THEM POWER. [/nutjob]


You are 100% right



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

08 Aug 2013, 1:42 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
LKL wrote:
foxfield wrote:
I think the invention of fembots would actually be a posiitive step forward in terms of human evolution.

Frankly, anyone who would prefer to have a relationship with a subservient robot than an actual conscious human being should really not be reproducing.

I'd actually very much prefer it if such people spent their energies getting it on with pieces of machinery. Its got to be better than them having real relationships with real human beings and, as a consequence, passing their idiotic genes on.

The overall result will be a human population that cares more and thinks more.

QFT
If that's what a man (or a woman, b/c there would probably be sexual androids as well) wants, better than he/she have a robot than that he/she tries to force his/her ideals on real people.


But then, some women will be complaining about them the way that some women complain about mail-order brides.

Last I checked, mail-order brides are women.



Schneekugel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jul 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,612

08 Aug 2013, 2:29 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
foxfield wrote:
I think the invention of fembots would actually be a posiitive step forward in terms of human evolution.

Frankly, anyone who would prefer to have a relationship with a subservient robot than an actual conscious human being should really not be reproducing.

I'd actually very much prefer it if such people spent their energies getting it on with pieces of machinery. Its got to be better than them having real relationships with real human beings and, as a consequence, passing their idiotic genes on.

The overall result will be a human population that cares more and thinks more.

QFT
If that's what a man (or a woman, b/c there would probably be sexual androids as well) wants, better than he/she have a robot than that he/she tries to force his/her ideals on real people.


But then, some women will be complaining about them the way that some women complain about mail-order brides.[/quote]

Its a free country, so let them complain. There are as well men complaining about that woman have to refund manhood for the lost benefit of owning woman as slaves. There will also be weird people. As long as they only do talking, be happy, your saving money for comedian shows.



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

08 Aug 2013, 8:07 am

GoonSquad wrote:
What about when they start making models that look like 5 year old girls instead of grown women? :eew:


I remember reading debates about whether or not they should have realdolls with a child form.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Aug 2013, 8:26 am

So, the Feminists actually approve of our hooking up with fembots? Well, maybe I won't get one, then. :wink:



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 122
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

08 Aug 2013, 9:36 am

hanyo wrote:
GoonSquad wrote:
What about when they start making models that look like 5 year old girls instead of grown women? :eew:


I remember reading debates about whether or not they should have realdolls with a child form.


I'm not sure, but I think that even cartoonish drawings of nude children are considered child pornography in the USA, and can result in a long prison sentence.



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

08 Aug 2013, 9:50 am

ArrantPariah wrote:

I'm not sure, but I think that even cartoonish drawings of nude children are considered child pornography in the USA, and can result in a long prison sentence.


Maybe but if that's true I wonder how the book stores get away with selling manga with minors nude and/or having sex in them or why they don't arrest everyone buying adult anime douinshi with minors from ebay.

Even in non adult manga like Inuyasha they show Kagome naked and she is 15.



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

08 Aug 2013, 10:00 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C8Slzx-Gpc[/youtube]


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Arizona

08 Aug 2013, 10:14 am

What's more objectifying, a vibrator or a 'fembot'?



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

08 Aug 2013, 10:24 am

Jacoby wrote:
What's more objectifying, a vibrator or a 'fembot'?


Definitely fembot, the two aren't comparable.

A better comparison would be fembot vs malebot and vibrator vs fleshlight. I don't think either is more objectifying than the other.