Why you don't see atheists feeding the poor

Page 3 of 4 [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Cash__
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,390
Location: Missouri

24 Oct 2013, 8:04 pm

The other thing all these studies do not consider is that a church itself is considered charity. So when a Christian gives to their church it is considered a charitable donation.

However, if you give a church $100; $90 of it goes to administrative costs and only $10 goes to an actual person who needs it.

I'd be giving more to the actual person in need, if I donated $40 directly to the cause and not gone through the church. Back out all that church administrative junk and get back to me.



adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

24 Oct 2013, 8:37 pm

Fnord wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
On what evidence do you base your speculations. ruveyn
Are you being ironic? Seriously?

He is very likely serious.

GGPViper wrote:
I speculate that atheists (at least in the US) are more likely to advocate government programmes rather than NGO charities to help the poor/elderly etc. than religious individuals.

When someone begins a claim with the words "I speculate that...", you can safely make the assumption that the person is indeed speculating. Asking for evidence as to why the speculation is being put forth is standard and accepted practice in the PP&R forum, as a quick perusal of past PP&R threads will likely show.

I would also like to see GGPViper's reasoning. He may actually have a point (he often does). Then again, he may not. We shall see ...


Speculation is, by definition, unsupported by solid evidence. Asking someone to provide evidence is therefore an unnecessary step where speculation is concerned. Had GGPViper asserted that his speculation was fact, I would support the request for evidence wholeheartedly. Without such an assertion, I suggest you do as I will: label his post 'opinion' and give it no further thought.

Kurgan wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/07/21/muslims-give-most_n_3630830.html

The more civilized arab nations also have welfare systems that are far superior to any system you'll find in the US. This also goes for Israel, Singapore and many other non-muslim countries that still have a high percentage of religious people.


From the article:

huffingtonpost wrote:
According to the poll of 4,000, carried out in conjunction with the JustGiving website, nearly four in 10 atheists did not donate at all, compared to three in ten Muslims, Catholics and other Christians, nearly three in ten Protestants and more than four in ten Jewish people.


Are you suggesting that 4000 users of a little-known private for profit charity are representative of the 7 or so billion people on the planet?



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

24 Oct 2013, 9:23 pm

Misslizard wrote:
^^^^Free range children are tastier,not as plump,but if you are watching your cholesterol....
Trick or treaters should be out soon.
Image



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

25 Oct 2013, 5:46 am

ruveyn wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
I speculate that atheists (at least in the US) are more likely to advocate government programmes rather than NGO charities to help the poor/elderly etc. than religious individuals.

On what evidence do you base your speculations.

In 2011, Pew did a survey dividing voters into overall groups depending on their political preferences (See a description of the typology here: http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/04/ ... -profiles/).

The group most likely to support bigger government, trust the government and want more government aid to the needy (Solid Liberals) is also the group with contains the highest percentage (40 percent) of religiously unaffiliated voters.

ImageImage
Image

Source:
http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/04/ ... oalitions/
http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/04/ ... s-sources/
http://www.people-press.org/2011/05/04/ ... tionalism/

Also note that the voters most distrustful of government on the same issues (Staunch Conservatives) are also very religious (43+ are White Evangelical).

Another perspective:

The countries that allocate the largest percentage of GDP to Official development assistance are also among the least religious:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_go ... il_2013.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Importance ... by_country

So the discrepancy in charitable acts between religious and non-religious individuals (even with secular charities) could be a byproduct of disagreement on how charitable work should be carried out: By individual donations or by the government.



thewhitrbbit
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2012
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,124

25 Oct 2013, 8:57 am

The people using the kitchen don't care what you believe in.

Stupid.



Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,677
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

25 Oct 2013, 9:25 am

thewhitrbbit wrote:
The people using the kitchen don't care what you believe in.

Stupid.


No they don't, however the people running the kitchen evidently do. Why they would care, I don't know.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,952
Location:      

25 Oct 2013, 9:51 am

GGPViper wrote:
In 2011, Pew did a survey...

I knew we could count on you! Pew Research is about as irrefutable as you can get.

Thanx! :D


_________________
The mere fact that science may not yet adequately explain an object, event, or experience does not mean the immediate explanation should automatically default to a conspiratorial, extraterrestrial, paranormal, or supernatural cause.


adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

25 Oct 2013, 10:28 am

Now he's made an assertion.

GGPViper wrote:
- some interesting yet dull-coloured charts -


Well-provided, sir.



crackedpleasures
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,367
Location: currently Belgium, longing for the Middle East

25 Oct 2013, 3:47 pm

Kurgan wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
Kurgan wrote:
So by cherry picking one soup kitchen, you've proved a point? There are many secular charitable organizations (eg. Amnesty). Despite this, people from the major religions actually give more to charity than most atheists do.


Collectively or individually?

Based on a percentage of earnings or irrespective of individual wealth?

I'd ask you to provide some 'evidence' but I'm quite certain you'll draw a blank.


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/07 ... 30830.html

The more civilized arab nations also have welfare systems that are far superior to any system you'll find in the US. This also goes for Israel, Singapore and many other non-muslim countries that still have a high percentage of religious people.


While this is true, one small sidenote: actually polls showed about 50 pct of Israelis are atheists. They may be Jewish in terms of race, because when you are born from a Jewish mother you are considered Jewish no matter if you follow the Jewish religion or not. Israel is a very secular place (except Jerusalem) and many people may be Jewish in race there but never observe the Jewish religion.


_________________
Do what Thou wilt shal be the whole of the Law.
Love is the Law, Love under Will. And...
every man and every woman is a star
(excerpt from The Book of the Law - Aleister Crowley)

"Od lo avda tikvateinu" (excerpt from the Israeli hymn)


JakeDay
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 2 Oct 2013
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 219
Location: Melbourne Australia

25 Oct 2013, 7:18 pm

Here in Melbourne Australia, the organisations handing out food to the poor are usually evil cults, like the Salvation Army. However, I can think of at least one secular organisation here, Food Not Bombs, and they do vegan food handouts as well, not the gluten loaded nutritionally bereft cheapslop of the Salvos.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

26 Oct 2013, 2:29 am

JakeDay wrote:
Here in Melbourne Australia, the organisations handing out food to the poor are usually evil cults, like the Salvation Army. However, I can think of at least one secular organisation here, Food Not Bombs, and they do vegan food handouts as well, not the gluten loaded nutritionally bereft cheapslop of the Salvos.

Totally uncalled for. :shameonyou:

After all, even the Salvation Army, who rock up with their trumpets, bassoons, tubas and tambourine ensemble, making more noise than Iron Maiden, have the common decency to wait until after lunch.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

26 Oct 2013, 2:04 pm

By the way, I noticed that 91 and Videodrome made the exactly same claim as I did earlier in the thread.

91 wrote:
My personal feeling is that secularists prefer to act through the state.

VIDEODROME wrote:
I have the impression that many Secular people tend to be more politically Liberal, so maybe they're comfortable with the idea of their Tax Dollars providing the Social Safety Net.

Neither of those claims prompted a 4-post discussion about the validity of their claims (nor a snarky response to my subsequent documentation). So, what gives?

If I am being selectively targeted for having a history of backing up my points with data, then perhaps I should stop being so responsible... It would make posting on WP so much easier for me, after all....



duncvis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,642
Location: The valleys of green and grey

26 Oct 2013, 4:55 pm

Plenty of secular foodbanks here. It's pretty much our only remaining growth industry.


_________________
I'm usually smarter than this.

www.last.fm/user/nursethescreams <<my last.fm thingy

FOR THE HORDE!


Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

27 Oct 2013, 3:03 pm

There is a huge difference between those atheists wanting to help the homeless and that woman who runs the soup kitchen.

The atheists want to help the homeless because they understand what it means to be human and wish to help a fellow human who is less fortunate than they are.

She wants to help the homeless because she thinks god will reward her.



DentArthurDent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia

27 Oct 2013, 4:23 pm

Robdemanc wrote:

She wants to help the homeless because she thinks god will reward her.


Come, Come, surely you are aware that the only force holding humanity together are the morals taught to us by god, and the fear of retribution from this vengeful and vicious being if we break these rules.

Oh s**t my eye just offended me, best I pull it out.

:lol:


_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams

"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx


adifferentname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,885

27 Oct 2013, 7:07 pm

DentArthurDent wrote:
Robdemanc wrote:

She wants to help the homeless because she thinks god will reward her.


Come, Come, surely you are aware that the only force holding humanity together are the morals taught to us by god, and the fear of retribution from this vengeful and vicious being if we break these rules.

Oh sh** my eye just offended me, best I pull it out.

:lol:


Yeah, don't piss off that Yahwotsit fella, he's (or so my street-dwelling chums inform me) "proppa nawty innit".