Fnord wrote:
adifferentname wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
On what evidence do you base your speculations. ruveyn
Are you being ironic? Seriously?
He is very likely serious.
GGPViper wrote:
I speculate that atheists (at least in the US) are more likely to advocate government programmes rather than NGO charities to help the poor/elderly etc. than religious individuals.
When someone begins a claim with the words "I speculate that...", you can safely make the assumption that the person is indeed speculating. Asking for evidence as to why the speculation is being put forth is standard and accepted practice in the PP&R forum, as a quick perusal of past PP&R threads will likely show.
I would also like to see GGPViper's reasoning. He may actually have a point (he often does). Then again, he may not. We shall see ...
Speculation is, by definition, unsupported by solid evidence. Asking someone to provide evidence is therefore an unnecessary step where speculation is concerned. Had GGPViper asserted that his speculation was fact, I would support the request for evidence wholeheartedly. Without such an assertion, I suggest you do as I will: label his post 'opinion' and give it no further thought.
Kurgan wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/07/21/muslims-give-most_n_3630830.html
The more civilized arab nations also have welfare systems that are far superior to any system you'll find in the US. This also goes for Israel, Singapore and many other non-muslim countries that still have a high percentage of religious people.
From the article:
huffingtonpost wrote:
According to the poll of 4,000, carried out in conjunction with the JustGiving website, nearly four in 10 atheists did not donate at all, compared to three in ten Muslims, Catholics and other Christians, nearly three in ten Protestants and more than four in ten Jewish people.
Are you suggesting that 4000 users of a little-known private for profit charity are representative of the 7 or so billion people on the planet?