1024 wrote:
A great many straw man arguments here: take what a few Israeli extremist nutjobs say, claim that it's the ("real") Zionism, voilà, you painted Zionism in a bad light.
Zionism is originally a secular ideology. It came from the idea that to make Jews safe from antisemitism, they should have their own country. By then antisemitism was largely ethnicity-based (not religion-based), and so was Zionism. In Israel the level of nationalism is largely uncorrelated to how religious someone is; a few ultra-orthodox sects even oppose Israel's existence.
Zionism is basically Israeli Jewish nationalism, nothing more. It is also often understood simply as supporting the existence of Israel and its right to defend its security. Only in this weaker sense is it effectively a requirement for an Israeli leader, as would be in any other country. Zionism is also not a unified ideology; as among any country's nationalists you will find everything from people who just want to live peacefully in their own country to extremist jackasses who want to conquer half the World.
This is not entirely true; even if Zionism was founded by secular jews yet the essence of the Zionist idea - that Jews should return to the Holy Land and establish a government - is not inherently secular, and in fact the Zionist movement had attracted the very religious members from the very beginning.
I am not* equating it with Nazism; it probably started as a reaction to Nazism but it's still a fundamentalist racist ideology; their actions from the very start prove this.
Last edited by The_Face_of_Boo on 23 Jul 2014, 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.