Ascagne wrote:
America could gain to europeanize itself, by the way).
Just as you (and I) disagree with the Americanization of Europe, I think the converse applies as well. For example, French social democracy and the restriction of gun ownership (both things you've cited as differences) would work quite differently in the states and this is primarily because of cultural differences in the populations. Also your perception of the rural U.S is quite skewed. The most natural and beautiful parts of my state (Pennsylvania) are the rural parts and that is why most people who can afford it live in rural areas. The cities (Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, etc) suffer urban decay and poverty. They are far less beautiful (although Pittsburgh is quite nice) because of industrialization. Furthermore, because of a huge difference in population density between the states and Europe (even in the Northeastern states this is true) homes and land are VERY cheap compared to even an apartment in Europe. Hence, people who wish to have fewer restrictions by their local government or the state will find it much easier to own land and build their home in a rural, isolated, place.
The biggest difference between the Americans and Europeans is rooted in how each has historically approached liberty. Europeans approached liberty as a positive government aim, in which certain groups gained special advantages based on their original placement in society. This enables collectivism. Americans have historically aimed toward negative liberties, meaning less government and fewer interventions. This enables individualism. This of course works because the United States is a huge federation with a population of 300 million, of diverse mindsets, and no national identity. It's as if we were to say a the European Union would collectivize its constituent countries and diverse peoples.
_________________
Your Aspie score: 157 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 47 of 200
You scored 112 aloof, 112 rigid and 115 pragmatic