06 Dec 2010, 4:40 pm
Orwell wrote:
I tend to use the word "illiterate" a bit more loosely than I probably should. I'm sure Palin is capable of reading (although she evidently doesn't do it very often).
Obviously you're not familiar with the ghostwriting process soooooooooo:
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Ghostwrit ... &id=332195
Generally they will read what the Ghostwriter writes, assuming she had a ghostwriter because she has a Degree in Journalism.
She has a communications degree.
At my university at least (and it is probably the same elsewhere), the communications school is known as a dumping ground for people who flunk out of the business school. And the business school is known as a dumping ground for people who flunk out of real majors.
skafather84 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Just cause you have someone working with on writing something doesn't mean you don't write quite a bit of it yourself. I wasn't referring to the ghost writers which she may have had a coauthor. I am referring to the idea that she is illiterate.
Obviously you're not familiar with the ghostwriting process soooooooooo:
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Ghostwrit ... &id=332195
Generally they will read what the Ghostwriter writes, assuming she had a ghostwriter because she has a Degree in Journalism.
She has a communications degree.
At my university at least (and it is probably the same elsewhere), the communications school is known as a dumping ground for people who flunk out of the business school. And the business school is known as a dumping ground for people who flunk out of real majors.
Basically what you said or if they want to get into TV or radio. The journalism "emphasis*" was because she wanted to do sportscasting.
*She was listed as having an emphasis in journalism but that's a vague term as far as what classes and how many hours she may have actually done.
06 Dec 2010, 4:45 pm
You are acting like a complete shill for the energy companies. Why do you fail to mention any of the American fishermen who had their livilyhood ruined by the BP oil spill, who are still suffering from the repercussions of lost business, despite the fact that the media isn't giving them any attention these days. 
How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy.
You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
06 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm
marshall wrote:
You are acting like a complete shill for the energy companies. Why do you fail to mention any of the American fishermen who had their livilyhood ruined by the BP oil spill, who are still suffering from the repercussions of lost business, despite the fact that the media isn't giving them any attention these days. How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy.
You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy. You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
Don't forget the Vietnamese immigrants who've had far worse treatment in that whole ordeal.
06 Dec 2010, 4:52 pm
LordoftheMonkeys
Veteran
Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 927
Location: A deep,dark hole in the ground
06 Dec 2010, 5:13 pm
06 Dec 2010, 5:15 pm
skafather84 wrote:
marshall wrote:
You are acting like a complete shill for the energy companies. Why do you fail to mention any of the American fishermen who had their livilyhood ruined by the BP oil spill, who are still suffering from the repercussions of lost business, despite the fact that the media isn't giving them any attention these days. How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy.
You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy. You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
Don't forget the Vietnamese immigrants who've had far worse treatment in that whole ordeal.
True. The Obama admin has downplayed the ongoing environmental and economic damages of the catastrophy to save political face. Even NOAA has been downplaying it. If conservatives really wanted to attack the Obama administration and government it should be for this. Yet not a peep. They only whine about the "rights" of multi-national energy companies being infringed on by the moratorium. It's sickening.
06 Dec 2010, 5:45 pm
marshall wrote:
You are acting like a complete shill for the energy companies. Why do you fail to mention any of the American fishermen who had their livilyhood ruined by the BP oil spill, who are still suffering from the repercussions of lost business, despite the fact that the media isn't giving them any attention these days. How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy.
You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
This is actually pretty funny. It was the government who actually encouraged risky deepwater drilling in the first place:
How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy. You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Water ... Relief_Act
06 Dec 2010, 6:56 pm
mcg wrote:
marshall wrote:
You are acting like a complete shill for the energy companies. Why do you fail to mention any of the American fishermen who had their livilyhood ruined by the BP oil spill, who are still suffering from the repercussions of lost business, despite the fact that the media isn't giving them any attention these days. How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy.
You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
This is actually pretty funny. It was the government who actually encouraged risky deepwater drilling in the first place: How can the government be certain a catastrophy like that isn't going to occur on another rig when the oil companies are protecting their reputation at the expense of being open and honest as to the cause of the catastrophy. You see, this is the problem with people like you. You only mention one side of the story and conveniently leave out the rest. That's what all the talking heads on the right do. They only present half the facts so people like you can soak them up and parrot them verbatim.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Water ... Relief_Act
I also find it interesting that Obama is supporting drilling even deeper off the coast of Brazil, yet he is banning drilling in the Gulf. Nobody here has even addressed this issue, but I find it interesting I can tie this also to George Soros.
06 Dec 2010, 7:06 pm
06 Dec 2010, 7:08 pm
06 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
...but I find it interesting I can tie this also to George Soros.
Are you playing Six Degrees of George Soros, again?
06 Dec 2010, 10:23 pm
number5 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
...but I find it interesting I can tie this also to George Soros.
Are you playing Six Degrees of George Soros, again?
Actually George Soros is responsible for everything "bad" that's happened in the world since around 1980. When Glenn Beck gets a parking ticket it can be directly linked to George Soros. When Rush stubs his big toe, George Soros was probably involved in some way.
07 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
marshall wrote:
number5 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
...but I find it interesting I can tie this also to George Soros.
Are you playing Six Degrees of George Soros, again?
Actually George Soros is responsible for everything "bad" that's happened in the world since around 1980. When Glenn Beck gets a parking ticket it can be directly linked to George Soros. When Rush stubs his big toe, George Soros was probably involved in some way.
Sorry but Rush, O'Reilly, Beck, and myself do not suffer from a Soros derangement syndrome, we actually reached our conclusions about Soros using something known as facts in conjunction of actually noticing an unusual circumstance of monatary collapses that somehow happens to on hand about.
07 Dec 2010, 12:59 pm
07 Dec 2010, 2:25 pm
07 Dec 2010, 2:52 pm
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Are there a lot of crazy people in this world? |
11 Jul 2026, 4:07 pm |
| Why are people questioning my ability to consent to sex? |
10 Jul 2026, 2:11 pm |
