13 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
TheDarkMage wrote:
well, the thread title asked me if i agreed with feminism - i dont need to read 20 pages of posts to give an answer. Now if i had started another thread about my own greivences then peole would have complained that it has already been done - no win situation. how many people have time to read that much?
again, so far i have only had one person (thehouseholdcat) respond to anything i have said without an attitude. if i get attitude then i will return it.
to be honest with you, i am always willing to listen to others opinions but the attitude shown so far has only gone to prove all the mens rights activists to be telling the truth - that femisists mock or react badly when you question feminism.
its a forum, i have every right to wade into things at any time i choose.
again, so far i have only had one person (thehouseholdcat) respond to anything i have said without an attitude. if i get attitude then i will return it.
to be honest with you, i am always willing to listen to others opinions but the attitude shown so far has only gone to prove all the mens rights activists to be telling the truth - that femisists mock or react badly when you question feminism.
its a forum, i have every right to wade into things at any time i choose.
naturally you don't *have* to read anything at all, but you posted on a thread while intentionally not reading the prior posts THEN you told us what we supposedly think. of course, you have no idea what we think because you didn't read what we posted.
i am not sure why you would expect anything less than attitude from us if you come into a thread... sporting an attitude.
13 Mar 2012, 2:09 pm
hyperlexian wrote:
naturally you don't *have* to read anything at all, but you posted on a thread while intentionally not reading the prior posts THEN you told us what we supposedly think. of course, you have no idea what we think because you didn't read what we posted.
i am not sure why you would expect anything less than attitude from us if you come into a thread... sporting an attitude.
i am not sure why you would expect anything less than attitude from us if you come into a thread... sporting an attitude.
err im not sure that i, at any point, told you what you think. i came into the thread with my thoughts regarding the original question, i was then mocked so out came my attitude. i never entered the thread with an attitude. still you dont seem to want to discuss the actual topic of the thread.
i was first driven to anti-feminsim when i realised how badly men were being mocked in the media. every advert shows a clever woman and a stupid man. one of the first things i was told when i looked up anti-feminism was how feminists reacted to criticism:
"they respond by either mocking you or by aggression"
yep!
13 Mar 2012, 2:12 pm
TheDarkMage wrote:
hyperlexian wrote:
naturally you don't *have* to read anything at all, but you posted on a thread while intentionally not reading the prior posts THEN you told us what we supposedly think. of course, you have no idea what we think because you didn't read what we posted.
i am not sure why you would expect anything less than attitude from us if you come into a thread... sporting an attitude.
i am not sure why you would expect anything less than attitude from us if you come into a thread... sporting an attitude.
err im not sure that i, at any point, told you what you think. i came into the thread with my thoughts regarding the original question, i was then mocked so out came my attitude. i never entered the thread with an attitude. still you dont seem to want to discuss the actual topic of the thread.
i was first driven to anti-feminsim when i realised how badly men were being mocked in the media. every advert shows a clever woman and a stupid man. one of the first things i was told when i looked up anti-feminism was how feminists reacted to criticism:
"they respond by either mocking you or by aggression"
yep!
you said what feminists think, but you ignored my words. i am a feminist and i have spoken for myself in the thread.
if i am mocking your aggression, maybe you should choose a different tactic than aggression in an internet forum. or was i supposed to be intimidated?
13 Mar 2012, 2:16 pm
13 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm
13 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm
13 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm
hyperlexian wrote:
TheDarkMage wrote:
yep thats another one.
"if you argue back they will accuse you of using aggression or intimidation in the hope of making other women gang up on you"
"if you argue back they will accuse you of using aggression or intimidation in the hope of making other women gang up on you"
ohhhh i misread what you said, i thought you were saying that we mock your aggression. i would definitely do that. it's much more fun than actual aggression.
of course, i haven't actually mocked you, but that website you linked was full of mockery.
ah scratch that last one then
13 Mar 2012, 5:07 pm
13 Mar 2012, 5:16 pm
13 Mar 2012, 11:55 pm
14 Mar 2012, 1:12 am
14 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
14 Mar 2012, 5:27 am
14 Mar 2012, 5:52 am
14 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
14 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
