Do you believe in God?
_________________
“In the same way that you see a flower in a field, it’s really the whole field that is flowering, because the flower couldn’t exist in that particular place without the special surroundings of the field; you only find flowers in surroundings that will support them. So in the same way, you only find human beings on a planet of this kind, with an atmosphere of this kind, with a temperature of this kind- supplied by a convenient neighboring star. And so, as the flower is a flowering of the field, I feel myself as a personing- a manning- a peopling of the whole universe. –In other words, I, like everything else in the universe, seem to be a center… a sort of vortex, at which the whole energy of the universe realizes itself- comes alive… an aperture through which the whole universe is conscious of itself. In other words, I go with it as a center to a circumference.”~ Alan Watts
Do you think the range of possible constants is infinite?
Yeah, I think AspE has conceded.
Do you really think that I used improper logic when forming my point?
You know, I met a cosmologist who believes that dark energy is the divine spirit of God. A 60 year old Mennonite that almost won the Nobel Prize in physics. Would you think his logic is more convincing?
I'm trying to use the Socratic method, would you mind answering the question? Is the range of possible constants infinite?
You don't get to do that... you can't just sit and ask the questions and knock down whatever anyone says... that is why we have identified you as a troll.
_________________
“In the same way that you see a flower in a field, it’s really the whole field that is flowering, because the flower couldn’t exist in that particular place without the special surroundings of the field; you only find flowers in surroundings that will support them. So in the same way, you only find human beings on a planet of this kind, with an atmosphere of this kind, with a temperature of this kind- supplied by a convenient neighboring star. And so, as the flower is a flowering of the field, I feel myself as a personing- a manning- a peopling of the whole universe. –In other words, I, like everything else in the universe, seem to be a center… a sort of vortex, at which the whole energy of the universe realizes itself- comes alive… an aperture through which the whole universe is conscious of itself. In other words, I go with it as a center to a circumference.”~ Alan Watts
I'm not breaking any rules. Is it so hard to ignore my posts? Deltaville is using some obscure physics terminology that takes time to research.
And I don't mind ignoring all your posts by theologian (master of fake knowledge) William Lane Craig, even though he's an apologist for genocide.
Thank you for giving me some insight into what you consider to be weighty sources.
_________________
“In the same way that you see a flower in a field, it’s really the whole field that is flowering, because the flower couldn’t exist in that particular place without the special surroundings of the field; you only find flowers in surroundings that will support them. So in the same way, you only find human beings on a planet of this kind, with an atmosphere of this kind, with a temperature of this kind- supplied by a convenient neighboring star. And so, as the flower is a flowering of the field, I feel myself as a personing- a manning- a peopling of the whole universe. –In other words, I, like everything else in the universe, seem to be a center… a sort of vortex, at which the whole energy of the universe realizes itself- comes alive… an aperture through which the whole universe is conscious of itself. In other words, I go with it as a center to a circumference.”~ Alan Watts
This is one of the few debates I think Dr William Lane Craig lost, imo Parsons won it from a debate points scoring perspective. I also think he came close to losing against both Shelly Kagan and Stephen Law too. I think Craig was rattled a lot by Law's Evil God hypothesis, it was a very interesting debate for those that haven't seen it. It was part of his ReasonableFaith Tour in the UK some years ago. Shelly Kagan had Craig on the ropes with morality. Parsons I think actually did win though.
I can already predict what the response will be. I'm not an orthodox Christian, I don't have to answer to rigid dogmatic faith positions, God is a metaphor for everything, all religions are reflections in different ways of one ultimate truth, yada yada yada... In this way people can justify religion without having to respond to any particular religious statement.
That's because there is no, nada, zero evidence for any religion...
He has never lost a debate. I have seen them all... most of them several times... I see him as a knight in shining armor. He is truly a genius.
_________________
“In the same way that you see a flower in a field, it’s really the whole field that is flowering, because the flower couldn’t exist in that particular place without the special surroundings of the field; you only find flowers in surroundings that will support them. So in the same way, you only find human beings on a planet of this kind, with an atmosphere of this kind, with a temperature of this kind- supplied by a convenient neighboring star. And so, as the flower is a flowering of the field, I feel myself as a personing- a manning- a peopling of the whole universe. –In other words, I, like everything else in the universe, seem to be a center… a sort of vortex, at which the whole energy of the universe realizes itself- comes alive… an aperture through which the whole universe is conscious of itself. In other words, I go with it as a center to a circumference.”~ Alan Watts
That's because there is no, nada, zero evidence for any religion...
Sometimes a religion is just a set of practices that people think are good, for instance, vegetarianism, meditation, not hurting living things. I don't have a problem with that. It's just when they start asserting things for which there is no evidence that it becomes a problem for me. Of course, allowing such personal beliefs is a right, but often those beliefs are imposed on others. Collectively, such beliefs form a society that's not based on any respect for what's true.
I consider him to be one of my profoundest intellectual heroes and one of my most important spiritual gurus. These very debates are among the most crucial "sources" that catalyzed my own spiritual rebirth in 2012. I highly recommend every single one of them. They are very entertaining and educational.
_________________
“In the same way that you see a flower in a field, it’s really the whole field that is flowering, because the flower couldn’t exist in that particular place without the special surroundings of the field; you only find flowers in surroundings that will support them. So in the same way, you only find human beings on a planet of this kind, with an atmosphere of this kind, with a temperature of this kind- supplied by a convenient neighboring star. And so, as the flower is a flowering of the field, I feel myself as a personing- a manning- a peopling of the whole universe. –In other words, I, like everything else in the universe, seem to be a center… a sort of vortex, at which the whole energy of the universe realizes itself- comes alive… an aperture through which the whole universe is conscious of itself. In other words, I go with it as a center to a circumference.”~ Alan Watts
No it won't. God seems to play favourites. Every child that has died from cancer or other illness, I'm sure had many prayers to God said for them, God turned his back on them.
I admit I couldn't get through Genesis.....
So, what you're saying is that you will not pray, and will not read and explore the Scriptures? A simple yes or no will be adequate.
_________________
The cutest most lovable little rob0t on Earth! (^.^)
Ok. What exactly did you find so convincing?
