Why Do Science Teachers Have a License to Lie?

Post Reply New Topic

If you don't know what rain is, your E.E. license should be revoked, forthwith.

Why not cut out the b*llsh*t?

ruveyn

Lines of Force are mathematical constructs which help to visualize the field. Lines of Force are fiction. The field is as real as rain.

ruveyn

But what is rain? I am an electrical engineer and I can't tell you what "a rain" is and neither can Meteorologists....

The Earth is a fairly young planet. There is no reason to believe the universe was much different before it's existence and planetary physicists can derive a lot of information concerning the young solar system based on current knowledge and various tests. To study the very young universe, we turn to telescopes, as this allows us to literally look into the past due to the time it has taken light from very distant objects to reach us.

The earth is over 4 billion years old. It is about 30-35 percent of the estimated age of the Cosmos which, as Carl Sagan says, is billyuns and billyuns of years old.

ruveyn

But what is BS? Modern science can talk it, but do they know what it is? Does anyone?

I am an engineer and I can't tell you what "BS" is and neither can biologists, physicians and physicists.

I can tell you what it does and how to use it but I can't tell you what it is.

What would happen if American History teachers started instructing their students that George Washington sailed over the ocean blue, in 1492? What about Benedict Arnold, a chip off the old block, who in 1620, founded Plymouth Rock? Would you believe the righteous white man, bought this vast and fertile land, from the factions of the red man, who had the upper hand?

What would be gained by teaching that the million American Indians, oppressed the early settlers, which made the patriots unite? Was that the reason we declared our liberty, and started a revolutionary fight? Did Thomas Jefferson defeat Cochise (if that makes any kind of sense), at Bull Run in 1783, to win our independence? And can we add to the confusion, that good old Andrew Jackson, was the Civil War President who saved the Union?

What is to gain by distorting history? Who gave our science teachers a license to teach false scenarios as “fact” concerning prehistoric history? What is the truth about the origin of our universe, and the history of our Earth? Our natural environment (realm) had a historical beginning, and was a historical event. So why is secular science allowed to require false statements to be taught to our children in public schools?

What was the hidden agenda of the first two paragraphs of this article? Could you tell? It was the denial of any involvement of our “mother country”, England. As a side dish, it was also intended to sugarcoat the truth about how “the West was won”, if the truth didn't fit our beliefs.

Our students are taught the ridiculous theory that there was a “Big Bang” (explosion) of condensed matter, that contained all the elements of the universe, about 16 billion years ago. What was in existence 50 billion years ago? What did our natural realm look like 60 trillion Earth years ago, or did it even exist? What was in the vast emptiness of what we now refer to as outer space, 70 quadrillion Earth years ago? These, and other questions, are not answered.

Science will acclaim a ridiculous and unsubstantiated theory, and later refer to that theory as “fact”, with its subsequent suppositions, such as the outdated Nebular Hypothesis, the planet Orpheus which became our Moon, and the “Primordial Soup”. But if the suggestion of a supernatural realm giving birth to our natural realm comes up, science quickly rejects it. Why? It’s because secular science is possessed by Atheism. It is the agenda of atheists to deny the existence of the supernatural, and to keep the rest of society from believing in any deity. Their goal is to prevent our children from "remembering their Creator in the days of their youth".

Secular science is not searching for the truth, as much as they are searching for a weapon to use against theism. Using the public schools as a recruiting ground, science attempts to disprove the existence of God, which is contrary to the U.S. Constitution, and fails the so called “Lemon Test”. So what sort of answers are our science teachers giving their students? What sort of answers are they allowed to give? Why are certain questions not allowed to be asked? It's because science teachers have not been squarely trained.

There is no way for mankind, on his own, to know what processes were in motion before our Earth came into existence. Since science has to “guess”, why do they reject the most probable answer, which is a supernatural creator? Why does secular science have the audacity to declare that they know the origin of mankind, and the origin of the universe? Don't be stupid. We have to be told by someone, or some other entity, what our origins are. Can a child just look up in the sky and magically recite their own genealogy? To embrace the belief that we can know the process of the birth of our universe on our own, is asinine. That's what happens to people that try to deny reality..., they become insane.

In order to learn what happened in history, we have to either ask those that lived during (or witnessed) those events, read what has been documented, or perform correct analysis on all available data, without prejudice. Mankind can not know what his origins are, without doing those three things. Students do not appreciate being lied to. They especially hate the “dancing around” that goes on to avoid discussing the historical document called “Genesis”. What are the consequences of atheist indoctrination to those that were taught differently at home?

So why do science teachers have a license to lie about history to their students? Doesn’t it make sense to cover all sides of an issue? Modern mankind was not around during the early history of our Earth. So why not include the documents given to us by the Eternal Entity (who was there), and the only modern human (Moses) that witnessed those events? Teach it all, not just atheist propaganda, and neither misrepresentations of Genesis.