The History Channel

Page 4 of 4 [ 62 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4

Previous topic | Next topic

oscuria
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,748

10 Sep 2010, 9:11 pm

_________________
sticks and stones may kill you.

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

10 Sep 2010, 9:18 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

So, is it more the policies they advocate which such rather than the truth of falseness of the rhetoric which they employ to conclude improper measures?

My problem is that the rhetoric is false and the policies don't benefit me. They appeal to workers/working class but the masters they serve are against workers rights. Republicans want to take away overtime and have already made it easier for companies to deny overtime pay to workers. I don't know what you make but if it's less than $90k/yr then you would be better served with a more liberal head (with the understanding that they'd actually enact liberal policies...Obama's actually been enacting a lot of moderate republican policy more than any actual liberal policy)

Actually, I'm just an unemployed student. Studying accounting at a college which has a contract for developing crap textbooks by the lowest bidder though, which I'm not thrilled beyond words about... However, isn't what you said similar to Pascal's wager? Pascal's wager has been called an "argument by consequences" and I think that suggesting the adoption of current American liberality on the basis of beneficial consequences is just the same type of argumentation. Or am I wrong about this, and how so?

Could you explain that position a little better because, to me, it sorta sounds like a jump in logic. Also, I'm not a very big fan of American liberality mainly because it's ineffective. I like what they do in Finland better (and I would move there if I had a legitimate opportunity).

_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

10 Sep 2010, 9:19 pm

oscuria wrote:

I could never smoke a bowl with that guy because his hair would just absolutely freak me out for the duration of the time I was high.

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

10 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm

skafather84 wrote:

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

So, is it more the policies they advocate which such rather than the truth of falseness of the rhetoric which they employ to conclude improper measures?

It's on wikipedia where a claim that Pascal's Wager is a form of "argument by consequences". Basically, Pascal's Wager was that if atheism were true, there would be no heaven or hell just nothingness, but if Christianity were true, then heaven and hell would exist rather than mere nothingness. It's what many preacher's mock as the "fire insurance gospel" and many atheists mock since it only considered two options.

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

10 Sep 2010, 9:30 pm

skafather84 wrote:

oscuria wrote:

I could never smoke a bowl with that guy because his hair would just absolutely freak me out for the duration of the time I was high.

If I were to trim my beard down a couple of inches I might look like that guy.

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

10 Sep 2010, 9:51 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

So, is it more the policies they advocate which such rather than the truth of falseness of the rhetoric which they employ to conclude improper measures?

So what you're saying is that I'm falling short in only expressing two sides? I mean my own beliefs are pretty nuanced and straddle back and forth between where I think government belongs and absolutely doesn't belong or where government is wrong in implementation of "help" versus what I think could actually help (I'm not a big fan of infantilizing adults). Is the american left wrong on stuff? Absolutely wrong on some stuff but considering my position as a lower-end worker, I'd rather the left side than the right side's laissez faire approach or, even worse, settling matters through private arbitration (which distinctly puts the individual at a disadvantage with complaints against a company).

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

10 Sep 2010, 9:52 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

oscuria wrote:

I could never smoke a bowl with that guy because his hair would just absolutely freak me out for the duration of the time I was high.

If I were to trim my beard down a couple of inches I might look like that guy.

You've got your hair feathered straight up on all sides like a peacock Doc Brown?

greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

10 Sep 2010, 10:13 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

oscuria wrote:

I could never smoke a bowl with that guy because his hair would just absolutely freak me out for the duration of the time I was high.

If I were to trim my beard down a couple of inches I might look like that guy.

I see the resemblence

_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Sep 2010, 8:14 am

oscuria wrote:

Who or what is THAT????????

ruveyn

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

11 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm

ruveyn wrote:

oscuria wrote:

Who or what is THAT????????

ruveyn

Obviously someone preaching the truth on History Channel about how Nazis working with the UFO aliens are a sign of the coming apocalypse as predicted by the bible and nostradamus.

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

11 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm

skafather84 wrote:

ruveyn wrote:

oscuria wrote:

Who or what is THAT????????

ruveyn

Obviously someone preaching the truth on History Channel about how Nazis working with the UFO aliens are a sign of the coming apocalypse as predicted by the bible and nostradamus.

It looks more like a set up photo from a pseudo article of the Onion.

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

11 Sep 2010, 2:19 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:

skafather84 wrote:

ruveyn wrote:

oscuria wrote:

Who or what is THAT????????

ruveyn

Obviously someone preaching the truth on History Channel about how Nazis working with the UFO aliens are a sign of the coming apocalypse as predicted by the bible and nostradamus.

It looks more like a set up photo from a pseudo article of the Onion.

http://www.legendarytimes.com/giorgio/

greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

11 Sep 2010, 7:34 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL7zugVZx3o[/youtube]

He is actually a regular in the show Ancient Aliens.

_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?

iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

11 Sep 2010, 11:12 pm

greenblue wrote:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL7zugVZx3o[/youtube]

He is actually a regular in the show Ancient Aliens.

Is he claiming to be one of them?

Page 4 of 4 [ 62 posts ] Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4

Jump to:

The History Channel Post Reply New Topic

The History Channel