Obama approval hits new low
Ancalagon wrote:
quiet_dove wrote:
If Obama is so "liberal," then why does he buy into religion at all? Most far-left individuals are atheists and agnostics and think that religion is just a bunch of fairy tales.
My impression wasn't that he bought into religion particularly, but even if I were wrong about that, saying that he's part of a minority of far-left types doesn't prove a lack of far-leftness.
Dennis Kucinich is a far-leftist. Compared to Kucinich, Obama's views are obviously centrist.
_________________
"Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." - Albert Camus
quiet_dove wrote:
Ancalagon wrote:
quiet_dove wrote:
If Obama is so "liberal," then why does he buy into religion at all? Most far-left individuals are atheists and agnostics and think that religion is just a bunch of fairy tales.
My impression wasn't that he bought into religion particularly, but even if I were wrong about that, saying that he's part of a minority of far-left types doesn't prove a lack of far-leftness.
Dennis Kucinich is a far-leftist. Compared to Kucinich, Obama's views are obviously centrist.
I have to keep correcting the dialogue: Kucinich is a leftist. Not a far-leftist. Obama is center-right. The problem is that the political gauge is so messed up here thanks to the media's relentless pursuit of hyper sensationalism and a strict abhorring of the actual left.
It's a 1984 semantics game: Center is "left, Left is "far-left", Far-Right is "right", and Fascists are "tea partiers".
The rest of the world thinks of the country as a far right country that occasionally makes a move toward centrism before swinging even harder to the right.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
Ancalagon wrote:
marshall wrote:
I think there are certain conservatives who actually have a rotten spiteful streak buried deep within their lizard brains and this is why they so fervently latch onto the meme. This can be seen through their thinly veiled hatred for people less fortunate than them.
Quote:
You people just have no clue.
Quote:
You get just as whiny and emotional
Quote:
You're ideas are neither sound nor rational. Everything you believe comes from a naive black-and-white perspective. You're incapable of seeing nuances.
Quote:
Where the f**k do you live?
If there was a rational argument in there somewhere, I missed it. I saw plenty of nasty insinuations, insults, conclusory statements, and plain belligerence.
I dont think it's worth my time to try and and refute arguments point-by-point and do hours worth of internet research to debunk factual inaccuracies. I also don't feel it's worthwhile to try and rationally argue with racists and people who harbor hate for people less fortunate than they are. I never claimed that you belong to the later group but there are other members participating in this forum who clearly do. I just don't see the point in rationally debating people who seem to lack a conscience. There's no convincing or enlightenment on either side when there's no common moral ground to even begin with.
Quote:
Quote:
I'm pleasent around others who are pleasent.
There are certain other members who I'm not going to mention by name who are my main target. More decent people such as yourself are merely collateral damage. I wouldn't mind having a more civil discussion with people like you but I just don't have the energy or motivation at this point.
skafather84 wrote:
quiet_dove wrote:
Ancalagon wrote:
quiet_dove wrote:
If Obama is so "liberal," then why does he buy into religion at all? Most far-left individuals are atheists and agnostics and think that religion is just a bunch of fairy tales.
My impression wasn't that he bought into religion particularly, but even if I were wrong about that, saying that he's part of a minority of far-left types doesn't prove a lack of far-leftness.
Dennis Kucinich is a far-leftist. Compared to Kucinich, Obama's views are obviously centrist.
I have to keep correcting the dialogue: Kucinich is a leftist. Not a far-leftist. Obama is center-right. The problem is that the political gauge is so messed up here thanks to the media's relentless pursuit of hyper sensationalism and a strict abhorring of the actual left.
It's a 1984 semantics game: Center is "left, Left is "far-left", Far-Right is "right", and Fascists are "tea partiers".
The rest of the world thinks of the country as a far right country that occasionally makes a move toward centrism before swinging even harder to the right.
Exactly.
skafather84 wrote:
quiet_dove wrote:
Ancalagon wrote:
quiet_dove wrote:
If Obama is so "liberal," then why does he buy into religion at all? Most far-left individuals are atheists and agnostics and think that religion is just a bunch of fairy tales.
My impression wasn't that he bought into religion particularly, but even if I were wrong about that, saying that he's part of a minority of far-left types doesn't prove a lack of far-leftness.
Dennis Kucinich is a far-leftist. Compared to Kucinich, Obama's views are obviously centrist.
I have to keep correcting the dialogue: Kucinich is a leftist. Not a far-leftist. Obama is center-right. The problem is that the political gauge is so messed up here thanks to the media's relentless pursuit of hyper sensationalism and a strict abhorring of the actual left.
It's a 1984 semantics game: Center is "left, Left is "far-left", Far-Right is "right", and Fascists are "tea partiers".
The rest of the world thinks of the country as a far right country that occasionally makes a move toward centrism before swinging even harder to the right.
I meant in terms of American politics, he's a far leftist. In terms of world politics, you're right, he is a centrist.
_________________
"Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." - Albert Camus
quiet_dove wrote:
in terms of American politics
I understand that but the only way to fix this semantic problem is to stop subscribing to it and using their wording.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
Quote:
marshall wrote:
I think there are certain conservatives who actually have a rotten spiteful streak buried deep within their lizard brains and this is why they so fervently latch onto the meme. This can be seen through their thinly veiled hatred for people less fortunate than them.
Quote:
You people just have no clue.
Quote:
You get just as whiny and emotional
Quote:
You're ideas are neither sound nor rational. Everything you believe comes from a naive black-and-white perspective. You're incapable of seeing nuances.
Quote:
Where the f**k do you live?
If there was a rational argument in there somewhere, I missed it. I saw plenty of nasty insinuations, insults, conclusory statements, and plain belligerence.
Quote:
I'm pleasent around others who are pleasent.
Right. Just as long as we understand that 'pleasent' means 'totally agrees with me'.
I think there are certain conservatives who actually have a rotten spiteful streak buried deep within their lizard brains and this is why they so fervently latch onto the meme. This can be seen through their thinly veiled hatred for people less fortunate than them.
Quote:
You people just have no clue.
Quote:
You get just as whiny and emotional
Quote:
You're ideas are neither sound nor rational. Everything you believe comes from a naive black-and-white perspective. You're incapable of seeing nuances.
Quote:
Where the f**k do you live?
If there was a rational argument in there somewhere, I missed it. I saw plenty of nasty insinuations, insults, conclusory statements, and plain belligerence.
Quote:
I'm pleasent around others who are pleasent.
Right. Just as long as we understand that 'pleasent' means 'totally agrees with me'.
LOL ! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!
marshall wrote:
I dont think it's worth my time to try and and refute arguments point-by-point and do hours worth of internet research to debunk factual inaccuracies.
Which is why, conventionally, you simply respond "Sources?"
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
Quote:
Which is why, conventionally, you simply respond "Sources?"
Why? I pretty much never see liberals offer up their own sources for their arguements.......... Besides the occasional biased 'sociology' study........ apart from that though, nothing really to corroborate their endless ranting.
Why is the burden of proof always on the conservative around these parts?
skafather84 wrote:
marshall wrote:
I dont think it's worth my time to try and and refute arguments point-by-point and do hours worth of internet research to debunk factual inaccuracies.
Which is why, conventionally, you simply respond "Sources?"
And there is no point as no-one ever provides any. There is no knowledge gained by anyone.
Hanotaux wrote:
Quote:
Which is why, conventionally, you simply respond "Sources?"
Why? I pretty much never see liberals offer up their own sources for their arguements.......... Besides the occasional biased 'sociology' study........ apart from that though, nothing really to corroborate their endless ranting.
Why is the burden of proof always on the conservative around these parts?
Because liberals aren't the ones spreading around factually innacurate memes these days.
Also, when the issues are on basic principles there's nothing to "debate". I simply find your values and attitude abhorrent. You give logical arguments I'll debate them. Otherwise there's nothing to do.
Quote:
Because liberals aren't the ones spreading around factually innacurate memes these days.
Please, liberals have no right to complain about Conservatives bashing Obama(per this topic,) after 8 years of constant lambasting of Bush as a borderline-special-child, and not to mention the similar level of bashing directed against successful state governor Sarah Palin.
To say that spreading 'factually innaccurate memes' is purely a conservative preserve, or that Conservatives are the only ones unfairly trashing politicians is absolute nonsense.
Hanotaux wrote:
Quote:
Because liberals aren't the ones spreading around factually innacurate memes these days.
Please, liberals have no right to complain about Conservatives bashing Obama(per this topic,) after 8 years of constant lambasting of Bush as a borderline-special-child, and not to mention the similar level of bashing directed against successful state governor Sarah Palin.
To say that spreading 'factually innaccurate memes' is purely a conservative preserve, or that Conservatives are the only ones unfairly trashing politicians is absolute nonsense.
How exactly was Bush not a "borderline-special-child"? Have you even listened to any of his speeches before? He doesn't even know how to put together a grammatically-correct sentence.
And Palin made herself into a laughingstock by acting like an immature child every time the media made fun of her. If she hadn't thrown all of those hissy fits, and if she had actually studied up on politics before accepting McCain's invitation to be his VP candidate, she probably wouldn't have been made fun of at all.
_________________
"Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." - Albert Camus
I'll agree with Hanotaux that factually innaccurate memes aren't made only by conservatives, but let's just say they're a bit more..."resilient" to accept the truth when the facts are presented to them, or debunking them in a manner that does not involve "shooting the messenger" (personnal attacks).
phil777 wrote:
I'll agree with Hanotaux that factually innaccurate memes aren't made only by conservatives, but let's just say they're a bit more..."resilient" to accept the truth when the facts are presented to them, or debunking them in a manner that does not involve "shooting the messenger" (personnal attacks).
Are you saying that conservatives are more willing to accept the truth than liberals are? If so, then can you give me a few examples to support that claim?
_________________
"Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal." - Albert Camus
