Page 4 of 4 [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

14 Oct 2010, 1:12 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:
Janissy wrote:
Dr_Horrible wrote:
Of course that would be impossible to swap to it instantly. Gradually though, we could strive to move into that direction, step by step. If the network is successful enough to expand by buying up companies and land, it wouldn't matter too much what discontents are thinking.


Oh yes it would matter. Some of those discontents have nuclear weapons.


Initially, we wouldn't expand as a kind of nation-state, but as a network of cooperative corporations.


At some point those networked corporations will have to topple the governments of their host countries. In small 3rd world countries this is feasible. Some people say that in a sense it has already happened in some places and certain 3rd world countries are run by puppet governments of multinational corporations. This sounds like it would start out as some sort of eco-green version of a multi-national corporation, attempting to win people over with a Google-ish "Don't Be Evil" motto of change. It would win converts this way at first. People really bought in to "Don't Be Evil" at first too. It could probably take over small countries in a stealthy sort of way. Costa Rica? It's when it attempted to take over the U.S., China, Russia, Britain, Japan etc. that WWIII would start.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Oct 2010, 4:39 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:
Hypothetically because there would be no other countries.

In a situation where there are...

And why would they need to move when they could get what they could get in other countries for free?

Quote:
I think it'll fail.


That's your opinion.


An opinion solidly based on history and a grasp of human psychology.

You proposals are simplistic, unrealistic and a-historical.

ruveyn



Dr_Horrible
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

14 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm

Human beings are a bit more complicated than just wanting to be paid more in money ;)



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Oct 2010, 6:11 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:
Human beings are a bit more complicated than just wanting to be paid more in money ;)


They also want love, admiration and status none of which readily measurable in physical terms.

ruveyn



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

14 Oct 2010, 11:26 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:
Human beings are a bit more complicated than just wanting to be paid more in money ;)

Anyone who thinks it's reasonable to even entertain the nonsense from the Venus Project has very little credibility when they criticize other people's "simplistic" views.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

14 Oct 2010, 11:29 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:
To AG: The cultural capital cannot replace the physical capital. If you don't mean we humans should cannibalise on one another in the future.

Strictly speaking, no, but a lot of your comments are about economic growth and what it requires.



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

14 Oct 2010, 11:32 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:
Human beings are a bit more complicated than just wanting to be paid more in money ;)

The big issue is that whatever they want will end up being a resource.

So, if human beings want status, other humans are likely going to have to be lower in status. If they want vacation time, then something else will have to substitute for the work. If they want sexual attention, then they likely want more than their fellows. Etc. While there is some malleability, there is not likely some way outside of an economizing box on the matter.



Dr_Horrible
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

15 Oct 2010, 2:33 am

Orwell wrote:
Dr_Horrible wrote:
Human beings are a bit more complicated than just wanting to be paid more in money ;)

Anyone who thinks it's reasonable to even entertain the nonsense from the Venus Project has very little credibility when they criticize other people's "simplistic" views.


Nothing of that was really an argument, but rather a re-inforcement of the dominant ideological paradigm.

It seems that you are angry. ^^



Wombat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2006
Age: 77
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,051

16 Oct 2010, 1:43 am

Ok, here it comes. Both barrels.

They say that the world is overpopulated, which in an overall sense is true but really isn't.

Actually all the Western countries have a birth rate below population replacement. The populations of Russia and Italy are dropping by hundreds of thousands a year.

The world population is going up because people in a few countries are breeding like rabbits. Look at the population of Bangla Desh.

And why can their population increase? Because WE give them billions of dollars in food and medicine.
As a child I remember do-gooders raising money for "the starving Nigerians".
Well they are STILL starving but now there are TWICE as many of them as there were then.

They have destroyed their own ecology and chopped down all the trees like in Haiti and Bangla Desh.
Now they are shooting each other and chopping each other up with machetes.

What is our answer? "Oh, we must invite millions of these people to come and live in OUR countries, because that is the "nice" and "fair" thing to do".

"The world is overpopulated so don't have children of your own". Better you should adopt an African baby like all the movie stars do.

Words cannot express how angry I am that we have chosen our own extinction to be "politically correct"

Within fifty years America will be majority Mexican and Europe will be majority Muslim.

Thank god I will be dead by then.
There, I have said it. Now dump on me and call me a "racist" or a "Nazi". I will still be right.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Oct 2010, 5:51 am

Wombat wrote:

Thank god I will be dead by then.
There, I have said it. Now dump on me and call me a "racist" or a "Nazi". I will still be right.


You are neither and you are right.

ruveyn



Asmodeus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,520

17 Oct 2010, 12:48 am

Dr_Horrible wrote:
Janissy wrote:
Dr_Horrible wrote:
Of course that would be impossible to swap to it instantly. Gradually though, we could strive to move into that direction, step by step. If the network is successful enough to expand by buying up companies and land, it wouldn't matter too much what discontents are thinking.


Oh yes it would matter. Some of those discontents have nuclear weapons.


Initially, we wouldn't expand as a kind of nation-state, but as a network of cooperative corporations.

-Corporations powerful enough to rival governments emerge.
-Some of them adopt the values you mentioned
-Others (there are always others; world market) remain steadfastly capitalist
-Capitalism is a more robust system, and as you mentioned always must grow, and these corporations do.
-Some of them adopt your pretty ideas about world change through corporate power.
-Corporations now rule the world. There's some wars between hired guns, endless urban sprawls and I can now buy scud missles to spice up the garden if I have the cash.

:wtg:



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

17 Oct 2010, 7:52 am

To O.P.

You advocate Utopian crapdoodle and balderdash. Please wake up and study some history.

The human race is its own worst enemy.

ruveyn



Dr_Horrible
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 9 Oct 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 151

17 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm

ruveyn wrote:
To O.P.

You advocate Utopian crapdoodle and balderdash. Please wake up and study some history.

The human race is its own worst enemy.

ruveyn


I will continue to advocate it until my guts are ripped out from my stomach by people getting tired of me, or until the success is reached, thank you. If I didn't believe such a world was possible, I would rather kill myself. I am also very active in real life for the coming of such a world order.

So I am not another naïve youth who should be "talked into his senses".

I am your enemy.

:)



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

17 Oct 2010, 4:40 pm

Dr_Horrible wrote:

I will continue to advocate it until my guts are ripped out from my stomach by people getting tired of me, or until the success is reached, thank you. If I didn't believe such a world was possible, I would rather kill myself. I am also very active in real life for the coming of such a world order.

So I am not another naïve youth who should be "talked into his senses".

I am your enemy.

:)


You are not my enemy. You are just foolish and your activity will come to naught.

You cannot change human nature. Humans are selfish for genetic reasons. Selfishness is a genetic characteristic that is passed from one generation to the other because it promotes reproductive success, which is all that nature "cares" about.

ruveyn

ruveyn



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

17 Oct 2010, 6:56 pm

I'm unfamiliar with the venus project, it looks somehow similar to Star Trek's utopia, doesn't it?


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?