Page 4 of 8 [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

03 Dec 2010, 4:20 am

Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
When someone's reasoning can be proven by math so simple it is taught in grade school, then excuse me unless our entire foundation of mathematics is wrong and 2 + 2 = 5, people like Glenn Beck are actually right and you are wrong. We are talking basic math, basic economics 101, etc. it doesn't take an accountant or a rocket scientist to understand the reasoning as to how they reached the conclusion they have.

No. People like you greatly oversimplify matters. Governments do not simply "go bankrupt" like an ordinary individual or company does. At least not governments with their own monatary system. A republican scare tactic is what this kind of hyperbole is. A debt / inflation crisis may eventually occur in this century if we do nothing, but we're not there yet. The immediate crisis is the lack of full employment.


They actually can go bankrupt (see Greece for instance) or they can use inflation to the point their money becomes worthless.

Btw, all I had to do in order to disprove your entire argument is show that one country has gone bankrupt. Further you can also look at Germany post WW I.

Do you even read? Greece belongs to the European Union. That is why Greece went bankrupt. Greece couldn't repay it's debt to the EU in euros as per their contract for joining the EU. The US cannot go bankrupt the same way since we are not beholden to any extra-national banking system. The US government borrows almost entirely in our own currency.

As for having a debt-spiral / inflation-crisis, that will not happen next year, or the year after, or even 10 years from now. The current deficit spending level IS unsustainable in the long run, but unlike European countries there is no immediate crisis.


Greece is still a country, furthermore last I checked the EU didn't form until after the Cold War Ended.


That has absolutely no bearing on my point. Zero. The US can print its own money so technically it can't go bankrupt. That is a fact. You can't win an argument by simply being emphatic and obstinate in your wrongness.

Conservatives who claim that the US is in imminent danger of "going bankrupt" while pointing to certain EU countries are not being honest. They are simply using peoples fear for political gain.


If the US dollar is basically worthless then you are essentially bankrupt. See Germany post WW I before Hitler gained power.


But the US dollar isn't worthless. If there was a real threat that the US dollar could suddenly become worthless then no foreign country would buy US treasury bonds. As to how things stand now, other countries we borrow from have far weaker currencies.



ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

03 Dec 2010, 9:22 am

xenon13 wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
xenon13 wrote:
As for violent rhetoric, certain people in Canada committed treason and were rewarded for it, and yes they are worse than any serial killer. That they continue to hold power in Canada shows that Canada is in grave danger.


I highly doubt they committed treason, get this through your head the left wing fanatics you are getting your information from are not telling you the truth.

Look up Germany post WW I before Hitler gained power.

Edit:

I also really didn't want to say this, but do Canadian Schools even teach history anymore? Cause there seems to be some serious gaps in what you know about history.


Excuse me, but pressuring bond rating agencies to downgrade Canadian bonds is treason and it has real life effects that are damaging to Canada. That's treason and the people responsible forfeited the right to live in this country at the very least.

As for post-World War I Germany how about the name Heinrich Bruening. Hitler gave lovely speeches during the 1932 presidential campaign mentioning the people who gassed themselves to death because of the depredations of the Hungerkanzler.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason#Canada

Canada's law doesn't doesn't agree with your opinion on what constitutes Treason. Its punishment is also life in prison and not death. You should be more respectful of the laws of your nation.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

03 Dec 2010, 11:08 am

Inuyasha wrote:

If the US dollar is basically worthless then you are essentially bankrupt. See Germany post WW I before Hitler gained power.



It is? Then how come I can buy groceries with my worthless US dollars?

ruveyn



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

03 Dec 2010, 11:33 am

xenon13 wrote:
Excuse me, but pressuring bond rating agencies to downgrade Canadian bonds is treason and it has real life effects that are damaging to Canada. That's treason and the people responsible forfeited the right to live in this country at the very least.


No, it is not treason if the bonds are genuinely not worth their rating, then that is the facts. The fact they were arguing for honesty is not treason. If you want to blame anyone blame the people causing the situation that caused the individuals you are slandering to demand the bond rating for Canada be lowered. Or wait that would mean the liberals would have to take responsibility for their actions.

xenon13 wrote:
As for post-World War I Germany how about the name Heinrich Bruening. Hitler gave lovely speeches during the 1932 presidential campaign mentioning the people who gassed themselves to death because of the depredations of the Hungerkanzler.


You really don't know your history do you. I'm making a statement here because it is obvious you don't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_ ... r_Republic


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation

Essentially if your money becomes worthless you are basically bankrupt, it has happened in history on multiple occasions. It causes severe unrest which I feel is what Liberals want in order to overthrow governments and impose a dictatorship style government on people.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

03 Dec 2010, 11:43 am

Moody's was saying there's no problem, these traitors were calling them up screaming at them to downgrade Canada's credit rating! They were screaming at them! These people wanted to manufacture a phony crisis by pressuring Moody's. They're traitors and they deserve to be dealt with for their treason. These were Canadians who were doing this, they wanted a fake crisis so to redistribute wealth and income to them and for social engineering purposes. They deliberately plotted to damage Canada's reputation. Their media was telling outright lies comparing Canada to Mexico and Argentina. That they're still on the loose means Canada is threatened.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

03 Dec 2010, 12:04 pm

xenon13 wrote:
Moody's was saying there's no problem, these traitors were calling them up screaming at them to downgrade Canada's credit rating!


Look, they would have no motive to do so unless they knew something you do not. Fact is investors look for bonds that are high rating as safe investments. They wouldn't be calling for the bond rating to be lowered unless they felt that investing in Canadian bonds was more risky than Moody was letting on.

xenon13 wrote:
They were screaming at them!


And maybe they had good reason.

xenon13 wrote:
These people wanted to manufacture a phony crisis by pressuring Moody's.


Unless you are a telepath, which you aren't, you have know way of knowing what their motives were. In fact, the only reasonable motive they could have had was that they honestly felt investing in Canadian Bonds was more risky than Moody was letting on.

xenon13 wrote:
They're traitors and they deserve to be dealt with for their treason.


I seriously doubt they are traitors, if anything they are concerned citizens calling the Canadian Government on being fiscally irresponsible.

xenon13 wrote:
These were Canadians who were doing this, they wanted a fake crisis so to redistribute wealth and income to them and for social engineering purposes.


That is more of what people on the far-left would do. That is a Communist, Socialist, position not a capitalist one.

xenon13 wrote:
They deliberately plotted to damage Canada's reputation.


No, if they are businessmen that live in Canada, their motivations would be to save Canada's reputation by stopping fiscal irresponsibility before it gets so out of hand that Canada is in as much trouble as Greece.

xenon13 wrote:
Their media was telling outright lies comparing Canada to Mexico and Argentina.


That may be stretching it comparing Canada to Mexico, but that looks to be more of exageration for effect so that people can realize Government is being irresponsible and potentially corrupt as well.

xenon13 wrote:
That they're still on the loose means Canada is threatened.


Again you are proving Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck to be right.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

03 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm

Let me explain it to you again. Plutocratic scum wanted some social engineering and redistribution in their favour. The method to get this done is to scare the people about this mythical Debt Wall. The key to that is to get the bond rating agencies to make noise about a downgrade in the credit rating. In the midst of all that, Moody's announced that Canada was doing well, that this idea of a downgrade was silly. This angered the plutocratic scum who called up Moody's and screamed at them, demanding that they play along with their manufactured crisis and either threaten to downgrade Canada's credit rating or do so outright.

Moody's said there was no problem. The plutocratic scum was falsely claiming that there was a problem in order to personally profit from it. This meant dragging Canada's reputation in the mud and creating real trouble if their threats were to succeed in getting bond agencies to downgrade Canada's credit rating. Moreover, their destructive reforms surely would damage Canada - the country has not recovered completely from the Great Canadian Slump caused by right wing social engineers. So any way you look at it, this is treason.



Last edited by xenon13 on 03 Dec 2010, 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

03 Dec 2010, 1:55 pm

xenon13 wrote:
Moody's said there was no problem. The plutocratic scum was falsely claiming that there was a problem in order to personally profit from it. This meant dragging Canada's reputation in the mud and creating real trouble if their threats were to succeed in getting bond agencies to downgrade Canada's credit rating. Moreover, their destructive reforms surely would damage Canada. So any way you look at it, this is treason.


It is not something considered treason by your countries own standards.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

03 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm

They were plotting to damage Canada's economy. That is sabotage. That's treason by any reasonable definition. Just as those Enron traders who laughed about putting California in the dark should have been treated the same way as hypothetical al-Qa'eda operatives having achieved the same thing.



xenon13
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,638

03 Dec 2010, 2:00 pm

The reason why the Enron traders didn't go to prison, the reason why those who screamed at Moody's didn't go to prison is simple - they are powerful, they are in power, the laws are not enforced against such people, they are above the law. That's the simple truth.



ikorack
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 15 Mar 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,870

03 Dec 2010, 2:05 pm

xenon13 wrote:
They were plotting to damage Canada's economy. That is sabotage. That's treason by any reasonable definition. Just as those Enron traders who laughed about putting California in the dark should have been treated the same way as hypothetical al-Qa'eda operatives having achieved the same thing.


Not with any overt signs of hostility, that means it doesn't qualify as sabotage. Even if it did it wouldn't be considered treason. They aren't in prison for treason because they did not commit treason. Reasonable definition or no your country's law disagrees with your assertions concerning treason.(and death for treason)



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

03 Dec 2010, 2:22 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:

If the US dollar is basically worthless then you are essentially bankrupt. See Germany post WW I before Hitler gained power.



It is? Then how come I can buy groceries with my worthless US dollars?

ruveyn


Our dollar isn't in the situation where it is worthless yet, however if the Fed keeps printing money like crazy the same fate will happen to us.



marshall
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,752
Location: Turkey

03 Dec 2010, 4:43 pm

In the case of the Weimar Republic, the issue was was debt in the form of war reperations that were owed in either gold or other currencies. The problem was Germany was forced to repay its debt in gold more quickly than it could possibly afford. This is what lead to the sudden hyperinflation. The US does not have a large debt in gold or foreing currencies. The vast majority of the US national debt is in dollars, i.e. government treasury bonds. It's impossible for the US currency to become worthless in a matter of years.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

03 Dec 2010, 5:16 pm

marshall wrote:
In the case of the Weimar Republic, the issue was was debt in the form of war reperations that were owed in either gold or other currencies. The problem was Germany was forced to repay its debt in gold more quickly than it could possibly afford. This is what lead to the sudden hyperinflation. The US does not have a large debt in gold or foreing currencies. The vast majority of the US national debt is in dollars, i.e. government treasury bonds. It's impossible for the US currency to become worthless in a matter of years.


Kinda bad when you can get more accurate news reporting from a message board than most of the media:
http://onedinar.forumotion.net/world-ec ... t25645.htm

I will take them with a grain of salt though cause I'm still trying to find a second source.

Also I know you don't like Glenn Beck, but at least read through the transcript:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,602103,00.html

With the Federal Reserve set to print $600 billion in order to buy Treasury securities, it is essentially funding the $1.2 trillion deficit for the next six months, according to Ed Yardeni, President of Yardeni Research. It’s even more if you count the reinvestment of proceeds from its mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/40008544/Fed_s_P ... r_6_Months

$600 billion being printed out of thin air, what is that going to do to the value of the Dollar, it sure isn't going to go up.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

03 Dec 2010, 5:18 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
Kinda bad when you can get more accurate news reporting from a message board than most of the media:
http://onedinar.forumotion.net/world-ec ... t25645.htm



I posted that a while ago.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

03 Dec 2010, 5:19 pm

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt144183.html


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson