Dox47 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
This seems to be no more than an exercise in "somebody else did better than me, so they must be breaking the rules" type of whining.
I wouldn't have put it quite like that, but it does seem like some people would really like to think that success is a result of dirty dealings or dishonest behavior in order to feel more virtuous in their own lack thereof.
Personally, I imagine that the wealthy aren't much more honest or dishonest than the public at large, it can just be a bit more high profile when they do something good or bad than for the average person.
I think there are some valid arguments against welfare. The effort should be focused on providing the poor with jobs, and not merely giving handouts. The reason is because many poor people are capable of work, but simply don't have the wherewithal, intelligence, mental ability, social skills, confidence, or job experience to actually get a job. It is very hard for a homeless person to get a job without any support, very close to impossible actually for many homeless people. Isn't it a little cruel to say that these people are simply lazy? Actually it is extremely cruel and self-centered, I take it back.
When people take advantage of welfare, I get pissed myself, but come on, some poor people are mentally ill (schizophrenic for example and do not deserve to be demonized. Most homeless don't even realize that they are deserving of welfare, and so the people who take advantage of the system help while the people who are severely disabled get nothing whatsoever. I admit this is very backwards.
Even autistic people, while many are capable of work, many who are low functioning are going to have extreme difficulty finding jobs, and so these people need to be supported.
It is about the mentality, this mentality that the rich are good and the poor are weak, stupid, and lazy, that is the mentality I want to rebel against furiously. Because it is elitist and cruel.