TM wrote:
The problem is that the people who hold the tome very highly also have America by the balls in that America is addicted to their oil. What should be done is that the Politicians of the non-Muslim world got together with their Muslim brethren and had a discussion entitled "THIS IS NOT AN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE!!"
Or, you know, Western politicians could try seriously investing in alternative energy technologies, rather than deriding the concept of algae as a renewable source of fuel as crazy talk during political rallies.
So far as burning the Qu'ran is concerned, I don't see anything more immoral about it than burning a Bible or a copy of the Bhagavad Gita-- which is to say, it is a symbol, and it's important to recognize that sometimes people get so attached to their symbols that they react rather adversely to them being desecrated. It wouldn't be nice, but at least no one would get hurt if the focus of anger
stayed in the symbols; burning an American flag, for example, doesn't really actually hurt anyone. But with a symbolic desecration like that, the anger often turns into violence. It would be prudent for anyone thinking about desecrating a religious text to really understand that before proceeding. It is, after all, an act
meant to provoke, so it's only logical to factor the potential outcomes of such an action before taking it.
Just because you have the
right to do something, doesn't mean it's a necessarily
good thing to do.
_________________
Mediocrity is a petty vice; aspiring to it is a grievous sin.