DC wrote:
When people start typing 'full stop' and using capitals, italics and bold words in the middle of a sentence it usually means they have absolutely no evidence to back up what ever absurdities they are claiming.
"Full stop" referred to the unqualified declarations of others.
The rest was used to emphasize the same words I'd stress if speaking verbally.
But take it as license to be obnoxious if you must.
DC wrote:
Get the picture?
I'm well-aware of the definition, which is precisely why I invoked it.
I find it hard to believe someone who opposes sexual equality wouldn't meet that description, your condescension aside.
DC wrote:
In no definition of misogyny does anyone mention feminism, you can not simply take a word and redefine it to your unique and wholly undefined usage and claim that the rest of the world should have known about your definition while pretending that the rest of the world doesn't define the word in a different way.
Excuse me for assuming it a given that those who oppose sexual equality and efforts to achieve it are misogynists.
I'm sure they have some OTHER motivation, yet to be elaborated.

Oh I see, you whine and moan about people speculating about millions of feminists and yet you speculate about the millions who oppose feminism, even going as far as playing armchair psychoanalyst. I'm loving your self-serving double standards. If everyone who disagrees with you is a misogynist, then everyone who disagreed with McCarthy must have been a commie. And like DC said, no dictionary defines misogynists as "everyone who opposes feminist ideology". Speaking of obnoxious and condescending, you really don't realize how much you're projecting.