The progressive case against Obama
I beg to differ. There is a strong progressive argument that views institutional investors and investment professionals as the driving force behind the excesses of Wall Street. Pension and Mutual fund managers are looking for a quick turnaround, and are driving directors and CEOs to look at nothing beyond share price; and to look no further ahead than the next quarter. Rip out the profits and bugger the future--that's the institutional investment model.
Okay, that's a very specific type of "professional".
Bankers create no growth and no prosperity. They provide the means whereby goods and services are exchanged, but they produce nothing beyond the services that they provide.
I think he meant in an indirect way. In the end it's a semantic argument.
But do not be deceived into believing that managing production is the same thing as producing.
Again it's a meaningless semantic argument. CEO's and managers are an integral part of the business model without which there wouldn't be any production.
The issue people have is when management targets cost-cutting to improve profits over expansion and hiring. That particular issue is more of a systemic problem than a legitimate reason to demonize IMO, but it's hard not to take it personally when actual lives are ruined through these changes. The real thing they are demonized for is spending money to influence politicians and push for tax breaks, de-unionization laws, free-trade agreements, deregulation, and other favors at the expense of the interests of workers and consumers. That is the crap that has to stop before someone gets their head chopped off.
I'm a staunch civil libertarian( a 20 + year member of the ACLU ) and I am an economic socialist but I can't bring myself to vote for the Green Party, whose platform that I support, because that vote would siphon off votes for Obama and help Romney and Ryan. As much as I oppose the policies of Barack Obama I prefer them to what we would have if Vulture and Voucher win next Tuesday.
I live in a swing state and I just want the constant robocalls, screeching TV adverts and the 10+ piece of political mail per day to end.
I live in a swing state and I just want the constant robocalls, screeching TV adverts and the 10+ piece of political mail per day to end.
Interesting question for you; do you think a President McCain would have been able to get away with as much as President Obama has in the civil liberties arena with nary a peep from the progressive left who claim watch dog status on these things? Would a President Romney have been able to form an extrajudicial hit squad and kill American citizens without oversight, preside over an unprecedented war on whistleblowing, attack foreign countries without congressional authorization, and otherwise act like W², without triggering a massive backlash from the left, perhaps enough to deter him from taking those actions in the first place?
My advice would be to go ahead and vote your heart, and if Romney wins than at least the left will remember who they are and come out of the woodwork to oppose the truly awful precedents and policies set by Obama. Hell, many of them don't even seem to know what the guy they elected has really been up to...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skw-0jv9kts[/youtube]
... and don't seem to care when informed.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Obama is too far right to be perfect for me. Actually if you truly believe in Pareto optimality you should legalize people getting stuff out of trashcans and dumpster because you would pick something out of a dumpster if was worth less than the price to take it out of trash in the first place. Also is the IMF anything but thinly veiled upward redistributionists.
