Page 4 of 8 [ 123 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

dgd1788
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,335
Location: Indiana, USA

08 Jan 2007, 12:30 pm

Tequila wrote:
dgd1788 wrote:
janicka wrote:
dgd1788 wrote:
I would never live in Utah for that reason, Mormons elsewhere are usually accepting, just not Utah most of the time.


Well, my ex was an exception to that rule. We met in NY and he immediately began trying to brainwash me and convert me, etc. And he wasn't from UT either, though we did end up moving there.

I think that I would have been fine learning about Mormonism on my own terms (e.g. with conversion off the table). It would still be interesting to learn about Mormonism from an objective source. The only info on Mormonism seems to have a hidden agenda - either it is from the Mormon Church, which is trying to gain converts, or it is from strong anti-Mormon folks who treat Mormonism like an evil cult.


Saying that we are a cult is a sign of bigotry, therefore people who say anything bad about people's beliefs are bigots.


Right, my religion teaches that all black people should be murdered. Are you a bigot for criticising that belief?


I know that you don't have a religion that believes that. You are atheist, so your belief is a philsosphy rather than religion.


_________________
If great minds think alike, does that mean that stupid minds think differently?


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

08 Jan 2007, 12:40 pm

Stop ducking the issue and answer the question. I know very well that I'm an atheist. I'm saying that I have a religion that teaches that all black people should be rounded up and murdered. Are you a bigot for criticising my beliefs and basically disagreeing with them? If we didn't debate and dissect beliefs we'd be in a terrible state. It's how totalitarian regimes are erected. We need debate in any healthy society and no amount of trying to shut up people who wish to criticise your kind of imaginary friend will stop that.

Now, I wholeheartedly respect people's right to hold religious beliefs. I even fully and wholly support people's right to express their beliefs. What I don't like is people trying to stifle debate about the rights and wrongs of their chosen ideas by branding anyone who doesn't like them 'bigoted'.



dgd1788
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,335
Location: Indiana, USA

08 Jan 2007, 12:45 pm

No, because killing people is evil, I don't think it can be argued whether killing is right and wrong, does it make you happy?


_________________
If great minds think alike, does that mean that stupid minds think differently?


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

08 Jan 2007, 12:51 pm

Ah, now you've disagreed with a belief of mine, so I'm going to call you a bigot. Except of course that ethnic cleansing is an abhorrent idea and I'm glad you oppose it. But we all have different beliefs. It's the unwillingness to listen to reason and carrying on arrogantly propounding your beliefs even when you've been proved wrong that makes you a bigot. Not by criticising someone's (possibly flawed!) beliefs. Does this make more sense? ;)



dgd1788
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,335
Location: Indiana, USA

08 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm

Tequila wrote:
Ah, now you've disagreed with a belief of mine, so I'm going to call you a bigot. Except of course that ethnic cleansing is an abhorrent idea and I'm glad you oppose it. But we all have different beliefs. It's the unwillingness to listen to reason and carrying on arrogantly propounding your beliefs even when you've been proved wrong that makes you a bigot. Not by criticising someone's (possibly flawed!) beliefs. Does this make more sense? ;)


No it doesn't!

My religion has made me happy, and I know that when I do the right thing: I am happy! How are you happy with your beliefs?

Secondly: I can't be proven wrong, but I can be persuaded either by people or evil; Why can you defend your beliefs?

I stand up for myself and my beliefs and people argue about them. Religion shouldn't be an arguement, I was not argueing which religion is true; I was standing for my religion (my church) I am not afraid to do it, and I will continue to stand for my faith.


_________________
If great minds think alike, does that mean that stupid minds think differently?


janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

08 Jan 2007, 1:31 pm

dgd1788 wrote:
Saying that we are a cult is a sign of bigotry, therefore people who say anything bad about people's beliefs are bigots.


Look, I didn't say Mormonism is a cult. I merely pointed out that some of the people who publish books about Mormonism say that and I disagree with it. My concern is the utter lack of objective information available for people who want to study Mormonism as an academic rather than religious pursuit.



Laz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Dec 2005
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,540
Location: Dave's Toilet

08 Jan 2007, 1:53 pm

Quote:
My religion has made me happy


I bet, hows the endless celetial sex going?



dgd1788
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,335
Location: Indiana, USA

08 Jan 2007, 4:13 pm

Laz wrote:
Quote:
My religion has made me happy


I bet, hows the endless celetial sex going?


If you're talking about sex as in "Intercourse" I will say that you aren't funny, and that was not funny, nor is it true, and of no value to the subject of the matter.


_________________
If great minds think alike, does that mean that stupid minds think differently?


janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

08 Jan 2007, 4:59 pm

Laz wrote:
Quote:
My religion has made me happy


I bet, hows the endless celetial sex going?


dgd didn't find that funny. I, however, had to chuckle because my ex who was LDS was also a sex addict and he'd tell me how he loks forward to that :roll:

As if he'd get into the celestial kingdom while being addicted to sex :roll:



CeallachSolomon
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 328

08 Jan 2007, 8:02 pm

Simple answer to all this: you're all right, for different reasons, which means that you're all also wrong. dgd is right in that he's defending a personal belief, something he has every right. What he did wrong was tell people not to say things, rather than correcting them with concrete evidence. In that sense, Tequila was right for debunking his post. However, Tequila was wrong because, though the example he used was technically related to this argument, it was a bit too extreme to be considered applicable.

So there, you're all right. And those of you who're right, you're all wrong. Happy?



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

08 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm

CeallachSolomon wrote:
However, Tequila was wrong because, though the example he used was technically related to this argument, it was a bit too extreme to be considered applicable.


Maybe. Some religions advocate extreme practices, though.



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

08 Jan 2007, 10:34 pm

JUST SHUT UP!

1. By US law a Cult is a religous organization with less then one million members.

2.

Quote:
It is taken for granted by Christians, as well as many atheists, that a universal negative cannot be proven. In this case, that universal negative is the statement that the Christian God does not exist. One would have to have omniscience, they say, in order to prove that anything does not exist. I disagree with this position, however, because omniscience is not needed in order to prove that a thing whose nature is a self-contradiction cannot, and therefore does not exist.

I do not need a complete knowledge of the universe to prove to you that cubic spheres do not exist. Such objects have mutually-exclusive attributes which would render their existence impossible. For example, a cube, by definition, has 8 corners, while a sphere has none. These properties are completely incompatible: they cannot be held simultaneously by the same object. It is my intent to show that the supposed properties of the Christian God Yahweh, like those of a cubic sphere, are incompatible, and by so doing, to show Yahweh's existence to be an impossibility.


3. Let's all stop acting like Motherfrackin' two-year olds! This is turning into "My Gods better then yours! But mine actually exists, yours doesn't!"



amerikasend
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jan 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 404
Location: South Africa

10 Jan 2007, 1:29 pm

Geez, I knew one mormon guy back in high school and he was odd. He didn't drink soda cause of the caffeine, drink or smoke. I don't understand where the drinking beverages with no caffeine is coming from. I know in the book or moron, ooppps mormon, it says not to drink hot beverages.

Is there such a thing as a Black Mormon, meaning a black guy in that church?

aren't the mormons considered a cult. I always thought they were. Cultwatch considers them a cult. If you're going to join a cult, join Scientology. Don't you also have to be rich to join the mormon church?

I personally believe most of the believers are delusional.



Corvus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,674
Location: Calgary

10 Jan 2007, 4:27 pm

Quote:
3. Let's all stop acting like Motherfrackin' two-year olds! This is turning into "My Gods better then yours! But mine actually exists, yours doesn't!"


Thats true for me, a**hole :D

MY GOD EXIST!! !! :x :x :x :x :x :x :wink:



Flagg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,399
Location: Western US

10 Jan 2007, 10:22 pm

amerikasend wrote:
Geez, I knew one mormon guy back in high school and he was odd. He didn't drink soda cause of the caffeine, drink or smoke. I don't understand where the drinking beverages with no caffeine is coming from. I know in the book or moron, ooppps mormon, it says not to drink hot beverages.

Is there such a thing as a Black Mormon, meaning a black guy in that church?

aren't the mormons considered a cult. I always thought they were. Cultwatch considers them a cult. If you're going to join a cult, join Scientology. Don't you also have to be rich to join the mormon church?

I personally believe most of the believers are delusional.


You need several million dollars to get into Scientology. You literally pay to advance in the church.



janicka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,911
Location: Mountain Paradise

10 Jan 2007, 11:22 pm

amerikasend wrote:
Geez, I knew one mormon guy back in high school and he was odd. He didn't drink soda cause of the caffeine, drink or smoke. I don't understand where the drinking beverages with no caffeine is coming from. I know in the book or moron, ooppps mormon, it says not to drink hot beverages.


The Doctrine and Covenants, not the book of Mormon has the "Word of Wisdom" which says to not drink hot beverages. I don't understand why that means booze, coffee, tea, caffeine, or whatever. The commandment against tobacco is pretty straighforward, though. What's funny is that the same piece of doctrine says to eat meat in moderation for good health, but there seems to be no shortage of steak and bbq establishments thoroughout Utah.

Quote:
Is there such a thing as a Black Mormon, meaning a black guy in that church?


Nowadays, yes. Until 1978, blacks were allowed to join the church, but the black males were not permitted to hold the priesthood (women can never hold the priesthood). I don't know if this is an urban legend or not, but Salt Lake City lore holds that the Mormon leaders received a "revalation" about allowing blacks to hold the priesthood only a couple of days before the NAACP was set to protest on Temple Square.

Quote:
aren't the mormons considered a cult. I always thought they were. Cultwatch considers them a cult. If you're going to join a cult, join Scientology. Don't you also have to be rich to join the mormon church?


I've heard that, but since I live among them I hardly consider that to be the case. I have no idea what Cultwatch is, but there are quite a few Evangelical groups that distribute anti-Mormon literature about how Mormons are a cult and not Christian (hello, they worship Jesus... So what if they do it differently than you...). I think that the Evangelicals doing this is like the pot calling the kettle black.

Anyway, most definitions of cult suggest that practices be far outside the mainstream. Really, they don't. They have their church on Sundays, and they have a lot of activities where Mormon kids can play with each other, or singles events, etc. But so do lots of churches. The only oddity is the temple and the underwear, but they still take the underwear off to swim and so forth. They aren't allowed to talk about what the temple ceremony consists of.

Finances - you are supposed to pay tithing (10% of your income) to the church. Can't tell you if it is gross or net. You can't go to the temple if you don't pay the tithing, but that is only one of several commandments that you are asked about in order to gain admission to the temple. Scientology, on the other hand, only allows you to advance in their church if you pay massive ammounts of money. Also, I think they make you live in one of their compounds. Not sure about that, though.

Quote:
I personally believe most of the believers are delusional.


I think that can be said for believers of any religion.