Would an autistic communist nation survive longer than a NT?
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
You are advocating theft? Did I get that right?
No surprise. A socialist is a thief with a fancy justification.
ruveyn
Property is theft
No it isn't. It is something created by focus effort. Your computer is property. Did you steal it or did you buy it.
Land cleared from nature by focused effort is property. Land that was useless before and useful after is a human creation.
ruveyn
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
You are advocating theft? Did I get that right?
No surprise. A socialist is a thief with a fancy justification.
ruveyn
Property is theft
No it isn't. It is something created by focus effort. Your computer is property. Did you steal it or did you buy it.
Land cleared from nature by focused effort is property. Land that was useless before and useful after is a human creation.
ruveyn
My computer is my possession, I bought it to avoid state violence. I don't believe "focused effort" is a justification for despotism.
Unlikely, if anything I imagine an autistic communist society would last far shorter than one composed of NTs. For better or worse, from my own experience AS people tend to be more individualistic and 'lone wolf' on average than NT people and so would be unlikely to sacrifice their own autonomy for a strongly collectivist society.
That said, I am a poor-hating moustache-twirling capitalist so maybe that's just my bias speaking ![]()
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
That is Corporatism, not capitalism. Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production. There are a zillion small firms doing business Out There. That is more like a shooting gallery than a Top Down hierarchy.
Rushking: you do not know too much about the real world which provides all or most of the goods and services you use.
Most of the firms in the U.S. are small and medium size. The Corporations own the most but they are not the busiest players.
ruveyn
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
That is Corporatism, not capitalism. Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production. There are a zillion small firms doing business Out There. That is more like a shooting gallery than a Top Down hierarchy.
Rushking: you do not know too much about the real world which provides all or most of the goods and services you use.
Most of the firms in the U.S. are small and medium size. The Corporations own the most but they are not the busiest players.
ruveyn
Private ownership leads to top down collectivism which I find to be inexcusable, regardless of size.
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
In a communist society the decisions that affect everyone are made by consensus. Nothing stops individuals from doing their own thing as long as it doesn't subordinate other people.
I find that socialists are usually always one of two things;
1. Most commonly those who don't have diddly and are to lazy to earn anything even in the best of times.
2. Those that have had everything handed to them and their minds are soft from being spoiled.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
In a communist society the decisions that affect everyone are made by consensus. Nothing stops individuals from doing their own thing as long as it doesn't subordinate other people.
What about this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
In a communist society the decisions that affect everyone are made by consensus. Nothing stops individuals from doing their own thing as long as it doesn't subordinate other people.
What about this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
Did those killings happen in classless, stateless societies? Your being intellectually dishonest again.
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
In a communist society the decisions that affect everyone are made by consensus. Nothing stops individuals from doing their own thing as long as it doesn't subordinate other people.
What about this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
Did those killings happen in classless, stateless societies? Your being intellectually dishonest again.
Mass killings under Communist regimes.
Could the title be any clearer?
If I'm being intellectually dishonest (a complement from most of this forum) then you're being intellectually impractical (to put it mildly) by trying to portray communism as anything but party/government sanctioned enslavement and genocide.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
RushKing
Veteran
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
In a communist society the decisions that affect everyone are made by consensus. Nothing stops individuals from doing their own thing as long as it doesn't subordinate other people.
What about this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
Did those killings happen in classless, stateless societies? Your being intellectually dishonest again.
Mass killings under Communist regimes.
Could the title be any clearer?
If I'm being intellectually dishonest (a complement from most of this forum) then you're being intellectually impractical (to put it mildly) by trying to portray communism as anything but party/government sanctioned enslavement and genocide.
We are talking about communism, not state "socialism" which "attends" to bring about communism eventually. I hate Bolsheviks as much as you do.
Capitalism is a top down form of collectivism, I don't know what you are talking about.
Of course, all societies by virtue of existing has some collectivist elements, but communism and similar ideologies tend to be particularly big on it, emphasising everyone being part of a larger system and working together for the common good etc. Most AS people I know, myself included, tend to be the opposite of that, preferring to follow our own initiative and ideas rather than whatever the latest authority figure says, so I can't see an AS communist society lasting long before it tears itself apart because everyone decides to do their own thing
In a communist society the decisions that affect everyone are made by consensus. Nothing stops individuals from doing their own thing as long as it doesn't subordinate other people.
What about this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes
Did those killings happen in classless, stateless societies? Your being intellectually dishonest again.
Mass killings under Communist regimes.
Could the title be any clearer?
If I'm being intellectually dishonest (a complement from most of this forum) then you're being intellectually impractical (to put it mildly) by trying to portray communism as anything but party/government sanctioned enslavement and genocide.
We are talking about communism, not state "socialism" which "attends" to bring about communism eventually. I hate Bolsheviks as much as you do.
Communism is as communism does.
History has already been made and your workers (slackers) paradise experiment has failed.
Nuff said.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
