Former Moonie says Trump is a cult leader
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
How so? I don't recall Obama supporters hanging on his every word, and rejecting everything from legitimate news sources, to scientists, to academia. In fact, as I recall, that was the right even back then.
Google Obama the messiah. There were supporters that thought of him as a messianic figure. Barbara Walters: "We thought Obama was the next Messiah." Chicago Tribune: "From messiah to mediocrity. You really don't recall people thinking of Obama that way??
But seriously, did they mean that literally? A messiah as in a charismatic leader who ushers in reforms, with equality for people despite race or income; yeah, there was that. But was Obama ever seen as "the Chosen One," sent by God? Absolutely not. But it certainly is the case with Trump's worshipers.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
How so? I don't recall Obama supporters hanging on his every word, and rejecting everything from legitimate news sources, to scientists, to academia. In fact, as I recall, that was the right even back then.
Google Obama the messiah. There were supporters that thought of him as a messianic figure. Barbara Walters: "We thought Obama was the next Messiah." Chicago Tribune: "From messiah to mediocrity. You really don't recall people thinking of Obama that way??
That still was not as extreme as the Evangelicals supporting Trump claiming that they will fight a second civil war if he gets impeached.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Very few white people in those days actually gave a s**t about the rights of black people, or indigenous people, or Asians, or other white immigrants from countries like Ireland and Germany.
I'm sorry but I just don't buy into the white savior crap that the US government shoves down our throats about that war. Both sides treated black people and former slaves like s**t before, during, and long after the war.
Edit: Also it just bothers me because that war really destroyed the south and after being defeated we were basically reduced to being the scapegoats for all the problems of racism in this country.
I just don't get why so many southerners are deeply patriotic for a country that treated them like s**t?

Ok, rant over.
Lincoln certainly did change and grow as a President and as a human being. He did finally realize that blacks needed to be given full citizenship as Americans, including the right to vote, and Republican Radicals like Thaddeus Stevens also were very concerned for the rights and welfare of blacks. To be sure though, there was plenty of racism in the north as well as the south.
My point is, the Confederacy had been formed solely for the preservation of slavery and white supremacy, which is confirmed by the writings and statements by their own political leaders.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Very few white people in those days actually gave a s**t about the rights of black people, or indigenous people, or Asians, or other white immigrants from countries like Ireland and Germany.
I'm sorry but I just don't buy into the white savior crap that the US government shoves down our throats about that war. Both sides treated black people and former slaves like s**t before, during, and long after the war.
Edit: Also it just bothers me because that war really destroyed the south and after being defeated we were basically reduced to being the scapegoats for all the problems of racism in this country.
I just don't get why so many southerners are deeply patriotic for a country that treated them like s**t?

Ok, rant over.
Lincoln certainly did change and grow as a President and as a human being. He did finally realize that blacks needed to be given full citizenship as Americans, including the right to vote, and Republican Radicals like Thaddeus Stevens also were very concerned for the rights and welfare of blacks. To be sure though, there was plenty of racism in the north as well as the south.
My point is, the Confederacy had been formed solely for the preservation of slavery and white supremacy, which is confirmed by the writings and statements by their own political leaders.
I still think what they did to the south was pretty sh***y though. They destroyed us and the south never fully recovered from the war.
We're the region that the rest of the country loves to hate. They often make jokes about us on TV at our expense and mock us as "rednecks", "hillbillies", and "hicks". They claim that we are all illiterate racist inbreds because the rest of the country does not want to take a look in the mirror at some of the racist crap they have done too.
But really, I think what it all boils down to is that the north just wanted to hurt the south as much as possible because they saw us as the "traitors".
Edit: Or more like the American government itself wanted to hurt the south for treason and the northerners went along with it.
Obviously the tensions are still there or else we would not have a nutjob of a president threatening to start another civil war and people on both sides of American politics being quick to jump on the bandwagon like when they reported it all over the news to stir people up.
Last edited by DoTheTw1zt on 15 Oct 2019, 8:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Any racial divisiveness came from how whites with bigoted ideologies couldn't abide by the color of his skin. It wasn't anything Obama himself had done.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Any racial divisiveness came from how whites with bigoted ideologies couldn't abide by the color of his skin. It wasn't anything Obama himself had done.
Though I agree many people hated Obama out of racism. I think the fact that he refused to punish former president George W. Bush for his involvement in things like the torture of Iraqi POWs in Abu Graib was pretty bad.
That's because both parties are in bed with the military-industrial complex. Obama is every bit as much a war criminal as Bush. taking us from two to seven wars in the ME. According to Chomsky, every post WW2 president, if held to the standards of the Nuremberg tribunals, would be indictable for war crimes. It's an ugly truth, but it's true.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
That's because both parties are in bed with the military-industrial complex. Obama is every bit as much a war criminal as Bush. taking us from two to seven wars in the ME. According to Chomsky, every post WW2 president, if held to the standards of the Nuremberg tribunals, would be indictable for war crimes. It's an ugly truth, but it's true.
I know. That's pretty much why I despise this country. It baffles me how our government gets away with the s**t that it does.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Any racial divisiveness came from how whites with bigoted ideologies couldn't abide by the color of his skin. It wasn't anything Obama himself had done.
Though I agree many people hated Obama out of racism. I think the fact that he refused to punish former president George W. Bush for his involvement in things like the torture of Iraqi POWs in Abu Graib was pretty bad.
While Obama could have, he wanted to avoid banana republic tactics like putting political rivals on trial, which isn't the American way.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Any racial divisiveness came from how whites with bigoted ideologies couldn't abide by the color of his skin. It wasn't anything Obama himself had done.
Though I agree many people hated Obama out of racism. I think the fact that he refused to punish former president George W. Bush for his involvement in things like the torture of Iraqi POWs in Abu Graib was pretty bad.
While Obama could have, he wanted to avoid banana republic tactics like putting political rivals on trial, which isn't the American way.
So the American way is allowing our own leaders to get away with war crimes?
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 49,751
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Any racial divisiveness came from how whites with bigoted ideologies couldn't abide by the color of his skin. It wasn't anything Obama himself had done.
Though I agree many people hated Obama out of racism. I think the fact that he refused to punish former president George W. Bush for his involvement in things like the torture of Iraqi POWs in Abu Graib was pretty bad.
While Obama could have, he wanted to avoid banana republic tactics like putting political rivals on trial, which isn't the American way.
So the American way is allowing our own leaders to get away with war crimes?
In that instance, unfortunately that worked out that way. In most cases, no.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Dude, you and I must have been living in alternate dimensions back then and I'm fine with that I guess. It's been argued that Obama one of the most racially divisive presidents in memory. Living conditions in metro areas for minorities didn't get dramatically better during his eight years nor did their income from what I recall.
You won't convince me otherwise and I won't convince you, nor do I care to so let's just leave it at that.
That's actually one of the reasons I contribute to PPR sometimes: I know full well that the fact is that no amount of information no matter how it's presented or how factual it may be will convince most PPR participants to see and agree with the opposing viewpoint no matter which side they're on. That's simply the truth. Accepting that takes a lot of the stress out of participating in PPR.
Any racial divisiveness came from how whites with bigoted ideologies couldn't abide by the color of his skin. It wasn't anything Obama himself had done.
Though I agree many people hated Obama out of racism. I think the fact that he refused to punish former president George W. Bush for his involvement in things like the torture of Iraqi POWs in Abu Graib was pretty bad.
While Obama could have, he wanted to avoid banana republic tactics like putting political rivals on trial, which isn't the American way.
So the American way is allowing our own leaders to get away with war crimes?
In that instance, unfortunately that worked out that way. In most cases, no.
I guess we better get used to more cases of that happening then.
