Sand wrote:
There is probably no difference in this context between the words "meaning" and "function". Biologically we are merely carriers of DNA and our function is to see to it that our particular variation of DNA reproduces. This can be extended to Dawkins' theory of memes but beyond that the religious aspects are mere speculative fantasy with no verifiable basis.
If function and meaning are identified in this way then we are left with sheer futility, especially as your proposed function rests upon a circular argument. I do not believe that even Dawkins teaches that we exist ONLY to reproduce, or such a philosophy would have no more need for science than for religion. Have millennia of history been in vain, that late in time humans should swallow such an abominable lie?
This false teaching also effectively says that all who are virgins, (myself included) barren/impotent or whose children do not survive at least to adolescence have been living lives that have no meaning; with all due respect this is manifestly abject drivel.
_________________
You are like children playing in the market-place saying, "We piped for you and you would not dance, we wailed a dirge for you and you would not weep."