Page 4 of 11 [ 173 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next

Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

14 Dec 2008, 3:00 am

Moop wrote:
The paradox in that situation is: "Who created God?"
The big bang theory explains the creation of the universe, and abiogenesis explains the creation of life. Science doesn't explain everything right now. But that is the nature of science, to find an answer, not make one up.

According to the cosmological argument, there has to have existed something which created all else, and therefore predates the rest of creation. It must be separate from the physical universe and not bound by its laws. I made no argument concerning the origin of life, but the Big Bang does not explain the creation of the universe- merely its expansion. All of that highly condensed mass and energy had to come from somewhere.

DentArthurDent wrote:
@ Orwell how does the cosmological argument differ from the 'God of the gaps'

It differs in that the God of the Gaps is an appeal to ignorance, while the cosmological argument argues from known scientific laws. A notable example of the "God of the gaps" argument is Behe's "irreducible complexity." Basically, if we can't see a mechanism for how something evolved, it can't have evolved and "Goddidit." That is a God of the Gaps. The cosmological argument is different in that it is not based on such an appeal, but on simple thermodynamics. Matter (and energy) can neither be created nor destroyed. How then did existing matter and energy come to be? A counter is that they "always were" but this requires an infinite time span, which is incomprehensible. If there were infinite time in the past, it could never have all passed and we would never reach the present. Basically, there is no reason why anything should exist. Existence should not exist. The existence of the universe requires that at some point there was external input into it.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

14 Dec 2008, 4:24 am

DentArthurDent wrote:
Logic to my mind pretty much deletes God; so what is it that makes you believe; is it a feeling, just something you know to be true, an epiphany even, a personal experience that defies logic?

There were three very important elements for me.

1) Believing that I could choose to believe something, that I could simply decide to believe whatever I wanted.

2) Reading about the theory of the "god need". "Recent" studies in psychology/neurophysiology hypothesise the existence of a need for "belief in god", ( in many people ), created by the evolution in of fluid intelligence, which is what has us assigning cause, ascribing agency, recognising patterns, and seeking and creating meaning out of "chaos".

3) Several years of struggling, and failing, to make free-will work. I was ready to recognise that I was "in need".

Since "choosing" to believe in god there has been a kind of cascade of effects.

.



Last edited by ouinon on 14 Dec 2008, 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

14 Dec 2008, 5:37 am

richardbenson wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
@ Richard Benson - why?
why what? the most plausible cause for me anyways is an ET had a hand in mans creation and mens knowelge or lack there of turned into what happend into a religion to get all bossy with it


Are you familiar with the mythology of Stargate:SG1?



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

14 Dec 2008, 5:44 am

As for myself, I believe in God probably because I was raised Roman Catholic. But aside from my upbringing, I've always been a deeply spiritual person. Some people discover their faith after being raised in non-religious homes. There is an area of the brain associated with religiosity and religious experiences, and I submit that in some individuals this "God-zone" is less active or altogether inactive.



Khan_Sama
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 882
Location: New Human Empire

14 Dec 2008, 10:40 am

Code 19.

http://submission.org/miracle/

skafather84 wrote:
why do people go god?


Image


Which is why I prefer Linux. Similarily, I follow the Qur'an alone, instead of the barbarism of Sunnism/Shi'ism. Reminds me of a Robert Frost's poem "The road not taken" - I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference

Peace.



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

14 Dec 2008, 11:12 am

slowmutant wrote:
richardbenson wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
@ Richard Benson - why?
why what? the most plausible cause for me anyways is an ET had a hand in mans creation and mens knowelge or lack there of turned into what happend into a religion to get all bossy with it
Are you familiar with the mythology of Stargate:SG1?
much like the mythology of the bible its about as funny. maybe a little more so


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


carturo222
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 3 Aug 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,568
Location: Colombia

14 Dec 2008, 11:20 am

I do not believe in God because no solid train of arguments leads to that conclusion unless some serious distortion of terms or intentional self-deception is involved.



Moop
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 3 Dec 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 466
Location: Right here! Ya! Right behind the monitors glass! Get me out of here!

14 Dec 2008, 11:59 am

Orwell wrote:
According to the cosmological argument, there has to have existed something which created all else, and therefore predates the rest of creation. It must be separate from the physical universe and not bound by its laws. I made no argument concerning the origin of life, but the Big Bang does not explain the creation of the universe- merely its expansion. All of that highly condensed mass and energy had to come from somewhere.


I know we don't know where it came from. An answer will be found one day, but making up an answer does not solve any questions, it just satisfies curiosity.
That's why religion exists; to satisfy mans curiosity for things he cannot explain or does not know how to explain.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

14 Dec 2008, 1:12 pm

Moop wrote:
An answer will be found one day, but making up an answer does not solve any questions, it just satisfies curiosity.

It satisfies a need which many people have, and which, like any need, it is a good idea to satisfy, so long as doing so harms noone. Not satisfying it can cause chronic depression, anxiety, a sense of meaningless/purposelessness, tiredness, apathy, etc.

.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

14 Dec 2008, 4:05 pm

i haven't had any need to believe in god yet am a deeply spiritual person. in fact i was quite content to not believe in god. for most of my life i've believed everything is connected either directly or indirectly with everything else --- much like a set of interlocking gears. when one gear moves, it will eventually cause all the rest to move even if only very slightly...or like pebble tossed into pond with ripples spreading out infinitely...

i believe in predestination as opposed to freewill [99.999999999999%]....in the sense that whatever we do is almost totally determined by what everything else does. i believe some moments and some thoughts-feelings-actions are more important than others...i.e, not every moment is qualified with the same intensity and consequences.

sometimes we're on stage with the spotlight on us...the universe watching/waiting for us to act, and taking it's cue from the group that we are a part of....it is at those times that we have a miniscule measure of free will...in that the consequences of our thoughts-feelings-actions will be slightly more than the infinitesimal mathematical proportion of the totality constituted by our existence.

--->similarly when a leader makes a decision it generally has a greater effect than decisions made by the people he/she leads.

so the god i believe in is the master calculation or equation which is the sum total [maybe a fractal] of everything and nothing.....

**************

why do i believe in god? i had very little to do with it...i.e., it just happened. my god is not personal and not a creator....most people would hardly say my spiritual belief is a belief in god per se...but when i finally wrapped my brain around this 'divine equation'...there was absolutely no doubt...i knew that god had found me, in a manner of speaking.

the thing is...i have never felt there was an 'i' separate from 'god'. to say 'i' believe in 'god' is to imply, at least grammatically, a difference and separation between subject and object. for me this kind of duality or dichotomy is inappropriate and makes no sense at all..



demoluca
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 565

14 Dec 2008, 5:29 pm

I believe in god- but it's none of your business why. I'd prefer to not post it on the internet. In this case though, it over-rides science and I'm a very scientific person. :oops:


_________________
.?´¸.?*¨) ¸.?*¨)
(¸.?´ (¸.?´ .?´ ¸¸.?¨¯`?.


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

14 Dec 2008, 7:45 pm

demoluca wrote:
I believe in god- but it's none of your business why. I'd prefer to not post it on the internet. In this case though, it over-rides science and I'm a very scientific person. :oops:


I know exactly what you mean. I am also very appreciate of science but I have also have much reverence for God. All the good things I have in my life today are what God chose to give me. This has vdery strong meaning in a world where children are born in suffering, live in suffering, and die in suffering. In this world there are little pockets of heaven but there are also big swatches of hell.



Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

14 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm

I must say mr.mutant, compared to other christians I have met, you are like non alcoholic beer (compared to like a 10 L thing of vodka lol)
and as a Yule celebrator it is good to see you pay homage to your great day
thank you
:)



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

15 Dec 2008, 10:37 am

Eh?



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

15 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm

alba wrote:
whatever we do is almost totally determined by what everything else does... [ but ] some moments and some thoughts-feelings-actions are more important than others ... sometimes we're on stage with the spotlight on us...the universe watching/waiting for us to act, and taking it's cue from the group that we are a part of....it is at those times that we have a miniscule measure of free will...

I think it is more as if at rare moments something "free" happens, ( the "uncertainty" of the universe, a creative shift ), but even then it's not my freedom, when something changes without any normal reason. Those moments are precious, feel important, but I don't believe that they necessarily correspond with any moment or event which one would usually consider crucial. It might happen in the most humdrum/mundane situation. But cause changes apparently out of all proportion with the context/event.

Quote:
the thing is...i have never felt there was an 'i' separate from 'god'. to say 'i' believe in 'god' is to imply, at least grammatically, a difference and separation between subject and object. for me this kind of duality or dichotomy is inappropriate and makes no sense at all..

I know. but it still works best as a way to express it, for me. I don't know how else to express it and remain coherent. :)

.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

15 Dec 2008, 5:02 pm

@ouinon
consider 9/11 as a crucial event which changes a probable timeline to an improbable one...