Fnord wrote:
This is, it is important to make clear, nonsense. The image depicts the territory that is today Israel and Palestine (both under the Israeli flag), alongside Jordan. The positioning of the text and the orientation of the Jordanian flag makes it impossible to distinguish between the Jordanian and Palestinian flags.
Jordan is not, as much as Jordan might have liked to claim otherside in the 1960s, Palestine. The current states of Israel and Palestine were formed out of British Mandatory Palestine, which was governed separately from Transjordan, ruled by Emir Abdullah I. The British didn't "give" Jordan to the Arabs, and in any case, if that had somehow been our intent then I'd politely point to the Indian subcontinent (as well as the Sykes-Picot line just to the north) as evidence for why modern geopolitics shouldn't be bound by lines drawn by British bureaucrats many decades ago. But there was no agreement with the local Muslims that they would all move to Jordan - Israel was imposed upon them.
The fact is that Palestinians mostly do not want to be part of Israel, and Israelis do not want to be part of Palestine, and that there is no obvious route to peace. A two-state solution isn't likely to be acceptable as long as significant portions of both countries want to see the other eradicated, but neither is any other solution.
(Actually quite a few of the Israel-Palestine images in this thread are nonsense, but this one jumped out from the sheer brazenness of using an image of Jordan to represent Palestine)