Page 5 of 5 [ 74 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

22 Dec 2010, 8:19 am

LKL wrote:
FFS, Leejosepho, do you not see the difference between being in a church and being in a city council meeting?

Most certainly I do, yet the dilemma of what to do or not while someone is praying is still the same whether or not I might have any reasonable expectation of being in a prayer-free assembly.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 89
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

22 Dec 2010, 1:28 pm

leejosepho wrote:
LKL wrote:
FFS, Leejosepho, do you not see the difference between being in a church and being in a city council meeting?

Most certainly I do, yet the dilemma of what to do or not while someone is praying is still the same whether or not I might have any reasonable expectation of being in a prayer-free assembly.


What someone is doing silently and unobtrusively need not concern you.

ruveyn



waltur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 924
Location: california

22 Dec 2010, 2:39 pm

AngelRho wrote:
LKL wrote:
FFS, Leejosepho, do you not see the difference between being in a church and being in a city council meeting?


On that note, not all people who attend church are believers, either. They might be attending for different reasons--perhaps a friend/love interest invited them, perhaps they're genuinely curious, perhaps their trailer burned down/dog ran away/spouse dumped them for their best friend/pickup truck broke down/they ran out of whiskey and beer and somehow church seems to be the only place where they can find peace, at least for that point in time. They're there for their own reasons, not because they share those beliefs. To those people, I say attend, listen to the sermons, sing the hymns if you want to, but occupying a place in a pew does not obligate you to observe any particular practice. The churches I've always attended always say that things like communion and baptism are NOT for unbelievers. I've always been told that it's ok NOT to participate, especially where communion is concerned, and there might even be reason why believers themselves can't in good conscience take part themselves.

The thing is, at least in every church I've personally attended, no one is going to look down on you for not participating. They understand that you have your reasons and that's the end of it.

I think it's sad that atheists anticipate only negative consequences for being "outed." Frankly, I don't ordinarily see how its anyone's business what you do/do not believe. If you choose to or not to "pretend" to pray or sit/stand at key moments, I don't see how anything can happen to you. I know Jehovah's Witnesses also take exception to certain kinds of expressions. I may have my own objections to JW teachings, but it doesn't make any difference in how I relate to them as people. On the other hand, if a JW ambushes me in the McDonald's parking lot while I'm trying to put my kids in their car seats, I'm going to quote key Bible verses and I may unintentionally come across as being rude--it's nothing personal, I just don't have time to get into it right at that moment! One of my students, actually, is not necessarily an atheist or agnostic strictly speaking, but I happen to know she has a negative perception of religion in general. I might prefer otherwise, but I treat her no less than I do other students--she's quite talented and I may even invest more in teaching her than some of my more average kids. I have a couple of other kids who come from a Hindu family. I might mention church because it does carve out a huge chunk in my evening schedule at least one night a week, making it relevant if we have to find alternate lesson times. Otherwise differences in religion are a non-issue, and I give those two kids the best possible side of me as a teacher.

I could be wrong, but I at least like to think more of us are respectful enough that people who believe differently ought not feel threatened.

The only thing I can see that might be problematic in a real sense is that when religion becomes a point of debate, there is nothing that prevents the expression of views from either side. Expressing your belief opens that door for dialogue, and any opponent has the right to express feelings to the contrary. But expressing an opposing viewpoint does not equal persecution.


"on that note,"

LKL wrote:
FFS... ...do you not see the difference between being in a church and being in a city council meeting?


waltur wrote:
....wait, you're right. that's crazy. it's not like this is a thread about a city council trying to eject a group of atheists for wearing shirts that said "one nation, indivisible" when the council was deciding to open each session with a specific religion's prayer....


_________________
Waltur the Walrus Slayer,
Militant Asantist.
"BLASPHEMER!! !! !! !!" (according to AngelRho)


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

22 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm

ruveyn wrote:
What someone is doing silently and unobtrusively need not concern you.

Silent prayer is not even in the equation here. The matter is about out-loud prayer and what at least *can* happen in any location:

Quote:
One option is that I can stand and PRETEND TO PRAY to keep from looking like a religious outsider ...

The second option ... symbolically communicates to all that I am a religious outsider ...


AngelRho wrote:
... at least in every church I've personally attended, no one is going to look down on you for not participating. They understand that you have your reasons and that's the end of it.

Maybe I am just too paranoid or whatever, but my introduction to prayer included getting punished for not having my head bowed, hands folded together and eyes closed ... and I do not since recall often being in any church like you have mentioned.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

22 Dec 2010, 7:21 pm

AngelRho wrote:
Are atheists afraid of being outed?


The context is city council meetings. Atheists are actually the most discriminated religious group. People finding out you are atheist could possibly kill your political carrier.

But it is not just that. How about people that want to keep their religion (or lack thereof) to themselves? This is a AS forum so I guess you could understand something like that.

Our image of atheists could be guys like James Randi that is very strident about it, but many atheists would just not like to touch the topic and get inside all the enormous amount of flak you get once people figure out you don't believe in their god. Heck, I am right now pretending to be Catholic because I know how badly my family would react. I know that I should probably tell them eventually but, I'd like to choose when..

I mean:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimina ... ted_States


_________________
.


DeaconBlues
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2007
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,661
Location: Earth, mostly

22 Dec 2010, 8:28 pm

AngelRho wrote:
Exactly.

The whole praying in private thing was not an instruction to ONLY pray in private. All Jesus meant was that those who pray should not make a spectacle of themselves. It is not a universal prohibition against public prayer.

Matthew 6:5-6 (NIV) reads, "When you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Most assuredly, I tell you, they have received their reward . But you, when you pray, enter into your inner chamber, and having shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly." (emphasis mine)

I dunno - seems pretty clear to me, He didn't really care for public prayer...


_________________
Sodium is a metal that reacts explosively when exposed to water. Chlorine is a gas that'll kill you dead in moments. Together they make my fries taste good.


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

22 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm

DeaconBlues wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
Exactly.

The whole praying in private thing was not an instruction to ONLY pray in private. All Jesus meant was that those who pray should not make a spectacle of themselves. It is not a universal prohibition against public prayer.

Matthew 6:5-6 (NIV) reads, "When you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Most assuredly, I tell you, they have received their reward . But you, when you pray, enter into your inner chamber, and having shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly." (emphasis mine)

I dunno - seems pretty clear to me, He didn't really care for public prayer...


But you emphasized what you wanted to emphasize to make your point. You aren't taking into consideration the greater context.

It starts out "When you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites..." The manner in which they pray is such "that they may be seen by men. ...they have received their reward." It's not a prohibition against public prayer. It just means don't pray in such a way as to display to the whole world how holy you think you are.

Compare with Luke 18:9-14--He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and looked down on everyone else: "Two men went up to the temple complex to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee took his stand and was praying like this: 'God, I thank You that I'm not like other people--greedy, unrighteous, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give a tenth of everything I get.' But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even raise his eyes to heaven but kept striking his chest and saying, 'God, turn Your wrath from me--a sinner!' I tell you, this one went down to his house justified rather than the other; because everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted."

Obviously there is no problem with public prayer since the temple complex was not exactly a private place.

Back to Matthew, if you read on there is more clarification on doing things in secret versus in public. Matthew 6:16-18--"Whenever you fast, don't be sad-faced like the hypocrites. For they make their faces unattractive so their fasting is obvious to people. I assure you: They've got their reward! But when you fast, put oil on your head, and wash your face, so that you don't show your fasting to people but to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you."

The point here is that fasting is something done in obedience to God, which believers ought to do willingly and joyfully. The "hypocrites" apparently wanted to show that they were suffering for God.

In both cases, with fasting and in praying, the hypocrites "got their reward," meaning the praise and attention of other people. So if they've already received their reward, they have no need of a reward from God. If your worship is not up for display for its own sake, then your reward is eternal rather than immediate and yet temporary. Public officials saying a prayer on the behalf of the public means, among other things, that they are lifting up the concerns of their constituency and trusting God to enable them to be good leaders and make wise decisions. There is no Biblical prohibition for acting in the best interest of any group of people, and that includes open prayer.

Don't think I'm giving an opinion for or against public prayer with respect to city councils and so forth. I'm just saying you can't really make a solid Biblical case against it. There might be political/social/legal concerns. As a spiritual issue, there is no problem with praying publicly AS LONG AS the sincerity and purpose of prayer is maintained over any concerns for the image and self-righteousness of the one praying.



Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

23 Dec 2010, 1:45 am

number5 wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
NeantHumain wrote:
The Founders were quite comfortable restricting the franchise and public office to men of faith, so [why] can't we?

Obama took his oath on the Koran, so who is complaining?


False.


lol He wouldn't be a very deft politician if he had done so.



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

23 Dec 2010, 7:56 am

AngelRho wrote:
... the greater context.

It starts out "When you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites..." The manner in which they pray is such "that they may be seen by men. ...they have received their reward." It's not a prohibition against public prayer. It just means don't pray in such a way as to display to the whole world how holy you think you are.

... or how one might think they should also be.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

24 Dec 2010, 1:12 pm

AngelRho wrote:
I could be wrong, but I at least like to think more of us are respectful enough that people who believe differently ought not feel threatened.



"Ignorance is bliss."


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.