Why most Asperger don't believe in free will?

Post Reply New Topic

When I hear of the term ' Free will' I immediately think of absolute freedom and doing whatever you want. That includes the ugly actions such as murder, theft and etc. In the end, you have the will to do EVERYTHING you want to do, every single thing.

And even then what is the difference between free will and selfish will. Us human beings are selfish by very nature as it is a way to survive in this world. As such I believe that everything we do is ultimately selfish. Even if we do something for others we also do it because it is beneficial to us as well. Because why else would you do something?

And I must ask, are you an agnostic? ( This has nothing to do with the original point of this post, but I do notice a similar thinking process.)

Look up the Libet experiments, and explain those away

"free will" is just another way of saying "taking the path of least resistance"

Brain Scanners Can See Your Decisions Before You Make Them

You may think you decided to read this story -- but in fact, your brain made the decision long before you knew about it.

In a study published Sunday in Nature Neuroscience, researchers using brain scanners could predict people's decisions seven seconds before the test subjects were even aware of making them.

The decision studied -- whether to hit a button with one's left or right hand -- may not be representative of complicated choices that are more integrally tied to our sense of self-direction. Regardless, the findings raise profound questions about the nature of self and autonomy: How free is our will? Is conscious choice just an illusion?

"Your decisions are strongly prepared by brain activity. By the time consciousness kicks in, most of the work has already been done," said study co-author John-Dylan Haynes, a Max Planck Institute neuroscientist.

Haynes updated a classic experiment by the late Benjamin Libet, who showed that a brain region involved in coordinating motor activity fired a fraction of a second before test subjects chose to push a button. Later studies supported Libet's theory that subconscious activity preceded and determined conscious choice -- but none found such a vast gap between a decision and the experience of making it as Haynes' study has.

In the seven seconds before Haynes' test subjects chose to push a button, activity shifted in their frontopolar cortex, a brain region associated with high-level planning. Soon afterwards, activity moved to the parietal cortex, a region of sensory integration. Haynes' team monitored these shifting neural patterns using a functional MRI machine.

Taken together, the patterns consistently predicted whether test subjects eventually pushed a button with their left or right hand -- a choice that, to them, felt like the outcome of conscious deliberation. For those accustomed to thinking of themselves as having free will, the implications are far more unsettling than learning about the physiological basis of other brain functions.

Caveats remain, holding open the door for free will. For instance, the experiment may not reflect the mental dynamics of other, more complicated decisions.

"Real-life decisions -- am I going to buy this house or that one, take this job or that -- aren't decisions that we can implement very well in our brain scanners," said Haynes.

Also, the predictions were not completely accurate. Maybe free will enters at the last moment, allowing a person to override an unpalatable subconscious decision.

"We can't rule out that there's a free will that kicks in at this late point," said Haynes, who intends to study this phenomenon next. "But I don't think it's plausible."

That implausibility doesn't disturb Haynes.

"It's not like you're a machine. Your brain activity is the physiological substance in which your personality and wishes and desires operate," he said.

The unease people feel at the potential unreality of free will, said National Institutes of Health neuroscientist Mark Hallett, originates in a misconception of self as separate from the brain.

"That's the same notion as the mind being separate from the body -- and I don't think anyone really believes that," said Hallett. "A different way of thinking about it is that your consciousness is only aware of some of the things your brain is doing."

Hallett doubts that free will exists as a separate, independent force.

"If it is, we haven't put our finger on it," he said. "But we're happy to keep looking."

why else would you do something?

Even if we do something for others we also do it because it is beneficial to us as well

because my mind is built the way it is, i will always make the same decisions no matter how many times the same situation presents itself.

if i was born again and the dynamics of my life were identical to this life i have, i am sure i would make identical decisions as i made the first time around.

i am not capable of deciding to do something i do not wish to do (if i am free to decide), and so it is inevitable that i will decide the same course of action no matter how many times i am presented with the same choices.

i do not have free will because there is only one course of action in a situation i will take even if i was born 30 times over and lived this life 30 (or even an infinite ) times.

i may think i have free choice, but it is inevitable that i will similarly choose what i will do every time i am presented with the same circumstance.

My mind works the opposite way to yours. Ideally, I would never knowingly make the same decision twice, such that if I was made subject to the 'eternal return',

would repeat none of my original decisions. I sometimes deliberately do things I did not wish to do, just to see how I feel (which varies) and what happens

Nonetheless, since I don't believe in unlimited free will, I don't say or do all this just to make a point.

there is no way for you to know whether you were faced with that decision before.

i am also not sure i can correctly comprehend what you mean by the "the eternal return". if you are alluding to reincarnation, then i can tell you that i was not speaking from that perspective.

that is strange. i always do what is most attractive for me to do.

i am sorry but i also can not respond to this as i have no idea what it means

i am saying that all decisions are inevitable.

generally, we're more logical?