ruveyn wrote:
Teaching in elementary schools was better 100 years ago. Compare McGuffy's reader to the Dick-and-Jane crap they teach in the lower grades now.
Back in those days youngsters were taught to write legibly and grammatically. Now they text each other.
ruveyn
I can't argue about the handwriting. It generally takes a back seat to keyboard skills these days. However, the Dick and Jane era stuff is no longer taught in lower grades now. It wasn't when I went to school in the 70's and reading texts for 1st grade readers have gotten even more complex since then. I googled up a McGuffy reader for 1st graders for comparison. It is written slightly above Dick and Jane and well below a modern 1st grade reader.
http://mcguffeyreaders.com/pics/1stread2.jpg
"Here is John
There are Ann And Jane
Ann has a new book
It is the first book
Ann must keep it nice and clean"
That is slightly above Dick and Jane readers which begin with "See Dick run. See Jane run. Run Jane run". The McGuffy reader is somewhat less repetitious and introduces more new words.
But here's a modern 1st grade reader with reading comprehension questions that today's 1st grader is supposed to be able to fill out (in admittedly terrible handwriting):
http://www.superteacherworksheets.com/r ... _TZZMD.pdf
It's very long so I'll only quote a bit-
"My dog found a ball.
It was a yellow ball
My dog loves to chew.
He chewed the yellow ball."
Today's 1st grader- unlike the McGuffy era 1st grader from the mid-1800's- must contend with two syllable words and also be able to go back and forth between present and past tense.