Does anyone else agree with feminism?

Post Reply New Topic

Yup. I agree with much of what you say.

Leaders of the feminist movement state that woman are superior moral beings.

Poverty and religion don't have as much motivation to make people breed their are a lot of people in this world addicted to sex and their need to breed is based on carnal lust sex becomes like a drug to them.

The reason why I prefer using Norway as an example is that it is statistically and legally the most gender equal country in the world. In the country, "feminists" still spend time complaining that women are paid less (despite it being due to the choices women make). They still complain that women are underrepresented, despite women being the leaders of the majority of the political parties. They still complain about being underrepresented on the boards of companies, despite the fact that there is a large lack of women with the equivalent qualifications and work experience of the men on the board.

I have more examples, but the ones above alone allow me to form the conclusion that there are two groups of women.

There is the group that women like Indira Gandhi, Christine Legarde and countless other women in high positions of great accomplishment belong to, that is willing to work as hard as men, as much as man and forsake as much as men in order to obtain the same success as men.

Then there is the group that wants to have what the above group and quite a few men have, but are unwilling to make the required hard choices.

Just today I read an article on how women are a very small minority of contributions to wikipedia, as a result a representative said that they should try to accommodate women more, to entice them to partake in editing and writing articles. However, I subscribe to the belief that men and women are creatures with a degree of free will and a woman who wants to spend her time editing or writing wikipedia articles will.

I often say that believers have so little faith in the god they believe in and to be honest it seems to me that feminists have little faith in their own gender.

Margaret Fuller considered the superior moral nature of a woman as a rational to allow women to vote.

That doesn't count as proof.

As far as keeping their birth rates up, it really does not seem to be working........Not at all. Poverty and organized religion seem to be much more effective and motivating people to breed.

Furthermore, even in liberal, socialist, scandanavia there STILL is a small, wealthy elite that is exempt from the taxation laws that the majority of citizens are subjected to. On the one hand they try to ensure that everyone's basic needs are met, but on the other hand they make it nearly impossible to move up the economic ladder to the top. Economic mobility is a double-edged sword: Anyone can get rich, yet anyone can fall through the cracks and sink into poverty(even homelessness) because there is no safety net.

You guys are seriously asking for proof about feminists thinking women are superior? How could you prove that? I think some feminists are simply interested in equality; others have a chip on their shoulder.

You are incorrect. There is, in fact, more upward mobility in socialistic countries like Canada and areas like Scandanavia than there is in the U.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socio-econ ... ted_States