nominalist wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
I you sure you won? I can't remember which game we are playing.
In the usual rules of debate, making an ad hominem attack is a disqualification.
JakobVirgil wrote:
My impression of your word of God tone comes from your habit of declaiming rather than making solid arguments.
That is another ad hominem attack.
JakobVirgil wrote:
Whose methods? the author of the paper now you are just playing right?
That makes no sense.
JakobVirgil wrote:
Finally we have driven past your ego and reached the actually interesting part of your post.
Yet another ad hominem attack. This is getting tiring. Conversation over.
Ah shucks I was looking forward to more unexplained proclamations from on high.
I think you may have a misunderstanding of the term ad hominem.
It means arguing that the character of a person makes his view wrong.
"to the man"
I did no such thing I did not say you were wrong because of your tone I said you were annoying because of your tone.
Or more importantly your style of declamation did not produce compelling arguments.
The Irony here is that your declaration of "winning" because of my ad hom was in -get this-
an ad hominem argument.
To make it easier for you.
ad hominem does not equal an insult.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/