Page 57 of 100 [ 1585 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 ... 100  Next

ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

03 Apr 2012, 7:51 am

myth wrote:
I stepped in to defend the unprovoked, relentless, and meaningless attacks of some valid points since such actions offend my sensibilities. Ad hominem attacks and bitter sarcasm do little to convince anyone to see your point of view, fyi. That being said, it is clear there is no actual discussion taking place on this thread any more.


The only ad hominem attacks in recent posts have been made by you...against me.
The "valid points" you refer to seem to be bitter, made up stereotypes of Western women as put forth by a self-proclaimed misogynist,
and you've done nothing to "defend" them other than to declare you agree with them, and cite SITCOMS as your "reasoning".

I agree, though, that there is no real discussion taking place any more,
because the people who indict FEMINISM refuse to elaborate on their very own positions.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 8:03 am

puddingmouse wrote:
Sitcom women are so far out of my experience of what people are actually like, that I assumed that they were a complete fantasy.

Interesting. That is not sarcasm, I do find it interesting that you have had this experience. I have met few, if any, women who do not act like women in sitcoms.

It shold also be noted that NT's often base their own views of society, gender roles, and what they themselves should act like off of the personalities commonly portrated in the media. Why else do you think people get all uppity about "role models" in entertainment?

puddingmouse wrote:
In the real world, a lot of couples have equal relationships, but a lot have abusive ones. Most of the abusive ones I've seen have the man as the abuser. I don't hate men for that.

This, too, is interesting. There are certainly many relationships where the man is the abuser since it is easier for a man to physically dominate women. I haven't personally known of an abusive-by-male relationship other than my ex husband but I do not blame that example on his being a male. He was just an emotionally black-mailing type of person. I have witness countless examples of females being emotionally abusive in ways like the examples I gave above, though.

puddingmouse wrote:
All I can say is that from my observations, patriarchy definitely exists. You disagree. We can chuck statistics and sarcasm at each other all day, but it won't change a thing.

Yes, I agree with this. I think that, on a large level, it is all a matter of perspective. We have clearly witnessed different things in life and it is undetermineable whether or not this is due to the people we have been around or simply due to what filters are on in our brain. I do not deny the concept of a personal bias. Everyone has them to some extent.

I just want everyone to deal with each person as an individual and stop defining themselves and others by gender. But that is unlikely to happen in general society any time soon.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 8:08 am

puddingmouse wrote:
myth wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
There's nothing uncivilised about the way VW posts, though I won't deny that she's sarcastic. There are other combative debaters on PPR, but she seems to be singled out. Wonder why that is?

I find her to be unnecessarily antagonistic to the point where I am of the opinion that someone else would have been spoken to by the mods by now.


Could you give me a specific example of her breaking the rules? Bear in mind the culture of PPR, and that we tend to be more lenient here.

I'm a mod btw, I just don't have a badge under my name.

I think she skirts the edge of breaking the rules but I have witnessed others on this very thread recieve a warning from a mod for similar behavior. Perhaps there is some core defining principle I am failing to grasp (I do this often) but it seems inconsistent to me. The yawns and eyerolling are pretty much translatable to "You're an idiot" in body-language speak and that's a personal attack. That might be a stretch on my part but that is how I feel about it. *shrug* Sorry for becoming antagonistic myself, I became emotional.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

03 Apr 2012, 8:09 am

myth wrote:
We have clearly witnessed different things in life and it is undetermineable whether or not this is due to the people we have been around or simply due to what filters are on in our brain.

Yet it is only one of you who extrapolates personal experience to MILLIONS OF PEOPLE AS A CLASS.
myth wrote:

I just want everyone to deal with each person as an individual and stop defining themselves and others by gender. But that is unlikely to happen in general society any time soon.

Gotta be honest. You're sounding pretty feminist-y.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 8:13 am

ValentineWiggin wrote:
Gotta be honest. You're sounding pretty feminist-y.

I don't disagree with the ideology. I disagree with the word itself and the common presentation.

Infact, I think perhaps I will start calling myself a masculinist and claim it stands for equality of the genders. I think that would be a fitting word for my ideology.

I do not judge a new individual by my prior observations. However, that doesn't change the fact that my general experience and observations have been what they are. I can speak about the people I've encoutered as a whole without incriminating those who I have not experienced. Also, seperately, the stereotypes exist whether you acknowledge them or not. I did not invent them, I am mearly commenting on them. Male stereotypes exist as well, you know. They all love sports and cars and beer and steak and are typically lazy and somewhat simple-minded and often immature and unintelligent. That's the stereotype of the typical male. Once again, I didn't invent it. I just didn't intentionally blind myself to it as you apparently have. There are plenty of people who don't fit into stereotypes. But stereotypes exist for the reason that MANY people DO fit into them and it is circular as well because the existence of the stereotype often causes the herd-minded person to believe this is what they should be like.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


Last edited by myth on 03 Apr 2012, 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

03 Apr 2012, 8:16 am

myth wrote:
ValentineWiggin wrote:
Gotta be honest. You're sounding pretty feminist-y.

I don't disagree with the ideology. I disagree with the word itself and the common presentation.

Infact, I think perhaps I will start calling myself a masculinist and claim it stands for equality of the genders. I think that would be a fitting word for my ideology.


Making up words for which there are already labels is all well and good- it just serves to confuse everybody. :)
The instant you declare yourself opposed to gender roles, everyone will associate you with radical feminism, anyway.

Curious, do you not know any fat women or women over 30?
Women seem to die after this age in sitcomland...

I find this all very fascinating, you can understand.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 8:21 am

It doesn't matter to me what others may label me as.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 8:25 am

ValentineWiggin wrote:
Curious, do you not know any fat women or women over 30?
Women seem to die after this age in sitcomland...

Is this a serious question or more sarcasm? I will answer if the question is genuine.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

03 Apr 2012, 8:33 am

myth wrote:
ValentineWiggin wrote:
Curious, do you not know any fat women or women over 30?
Women seem to die after this age in sitcomland...

Is this a serious question or more sarcasm? I will answer if the question is genuine.


I doubt it was serious.

Even I know you meant the behaviour of women in sitcoms rather than their age and appearance.

I think my experience has been coloured by the fact that I'm working class. The women I know don't have the luxury of acting like the ones in sitcoms and the gender roles are more 'traditional'. I put traditional in quotation marks because women have always worked hard in my community. I mean, really hard. You know like those African tribes where the men snooze under a tree and occasionally slaughter an animal, whilst the women do all the farming, building and childrearing? Kind of like a Western version of that (my own father isn't like that, though). And there have been some quite horrific cases of abuse in my own family (as well as very egalitarian relationships).

I won't extrapolate that as applicable to all members of a particular gender, though.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


ValentineWiggin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 May 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,907
Location: Beneath my cat's paw

03 Apr 2012, 8:37 am

Oh, I was being serious.
I've never met someone who genuinely asserts that real life can be understood in any dimension through television, or video games, or Hollywood film, or anything like that.

Apologies.


_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 8:44 am

Thanks for sharing that, puddingmouse. I work as well but I don't see an attitude of hard work among my collegues very often. I can definarely see how such an upbringing would affect one's view of the world. My mother raised my sister and I by herself from age 11 onward and she was a strong woman but I don't really see her as a shining example either due to her constant disparaging of my father (who certainly had his faults but did work hard to provide for us while he was alive) and men in general. And any time she sucessfully completed a task she would shout out "I AM WOMAN!" There are plenty of strong people, male and female. I dislike anyone who routinely insults (or compliments) people based on gender alone and I unfortunately see this type of behavior more frequently from a female group aimed at males.

Despite my comments seemingly to indicate the contrary, I do not extrapolate this behavior on to females as a group, either. I was mearly commenting on the stereotypes. It seems that, on this forum, there are many people who break the mold in this and just about every other area I've ever discussed to length. I don't think those people should hold themselves out as the norm, though. Perhaps there is no "norm" anymore.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

03 Apr 2012, 9:03 am

ValentineWiggin wrote:
Oh, I was being serious.
I've never met someone who genuinely asserts that real life can be understood in any dimension through television, or video games, or Hollywood film, or anything like that.

Apologies.


The media has never done a good job in representing the average woman imo. Oh no I'll probably called on this as a nasty western feminazi. As for my family, all the women have had to work hard. Even my sister who raises 3 kids and works double shift, which is not enough and an ex-husband who has never paid a dime for child support much less work or participate in caring for the children. Yes those awful uncivilized western women....


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 9:11 am

It is well known that TV not only offers a window/commentary into current society but also shapes the direction of it's next generation. I am surpised that this seems like news to some people. Some sources:

http://www.mediaculture-online.de/fileadmin/bibliothek/stafford_sitcoms/stafford_sitcoms.pdf

Quote:
Most sitcoms (The Royle Family being a major being a major exception) offer at least a
slightly exaggerated representation of everyday events – as in soap opera, most events
are possible in ‘real life’ but not with such intensity or frequency. Some push much further
into surrealism, based either on the setting (e.g. wartime, national security etc.) or an
eccentric/unusual character.


Quote:
comedies rely heavily on ‘social typing’ – characters based on traits related to
social class, age, gender and ethnicity. Comedy changes over time as stereotypes
change. Although stereotypes originally developed as aids to market research, they have
become powerful ways of defining social groups often by the dominant groups as a way of
labelling the ‘others’ in society. Negative stereotypes are the source of considerable
friction, especially when they can be demonstrated to encourage discrimination. Yet, there
must be at least a grain of truth in the stereotype for it to gain some form of currency.



http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=5002353336
Quote:
Children often internalize gender role stereotypes from books, songs, television, and the movies (Thorne, 1993). Television, however, is perhaps the most influential form of media (Lauer & Lauer, 1994). Research on television viewing and children's socialization indicates that television has a great impact on children's lives.


Quote:
If the child frequently meets such gender biases and gender stereotypes, this knowledge will be incorporated into future perceptions. Keeping in mind that young children with developing minds watch many hours of television, and recalling how television reinforces gender stereotypes, it is not surprising when children develop stereotyped beliefs.


This article also contains plenty of examples of male dominince in media portrayal so the feminists should enjoy it.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


Last edited by myth on 03 Apr 2012, 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

myth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 707

03 Apr 2012, 9:13 am

MissConstrue wrote:
The media has never done a good job in representing the average woman imo. ... As for my family, all the women have had to work hard.

Many women portrayed in the media have careers these days. The stereotype is no longer only housewife/mother.


_________________
Non-NT something. Married to a diagnosed aspie.

Nothing is absolute.


MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

03 Apr 2012, 9:23 am

myth wrote:
MissConstrue wrote:
The media has never done a good job in representing the average woman imo. ... As for my family, all the women have had to work hard.

Many women portrayed in the media have careers these days. The stereotype is no longer only housewife/mother.


No the usual stereotype is good looking, having a prince charming, too much time on her hands (think sex in the city), and raunchy as in stripper material. Not that I have anything against strippers but it gets a bit tiring to see women only being either fantasy material or princess in need of a prince. And the acting is glib and fake but this doesn't take boundaries on gender. No wonder I'm a huge fan of independent foreign films. Go figure.


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

03 Apr 2012, 9:49 am

puddingmouse wrote:
Sitcom women are so far out of my experience of what people are actually like, that I assumed that they were a complete fantasy.

Sitcom men are too.


_________________
.