Jacoby wrote:
What is a "strong" republican? Is that like Arnold Scwartzwnegger?
If you mean neocons, the actual ideologues are only a small % of the party. The base of the GOP's views are a lot closer to Ron Paul than you think. No Republican has the guts to take Ron on with economic issues. They'll try to scare folks into a war frenzy with Iran and then go after Ron on social issues. Then you just have the outright smears that have been thrown at him lately. These guys can't talk about anything in substance.
Ron appeals to independents, civil libertarian/anti-war democrats, Old Right conservatives, as well as republicans who have just plain had enough with the good ole boys in the party. A heck of a lot more than just 3% of the country.
From reading The 5,000 Year Leap I think K Cleon Skousen would like a lot of what he's about, he'd like a lot of what the tea party is about as well. The two things that I think chase people away from Paul though are pull up all military bases around the world and legalize heroin. It seems like everything else a conservative would love; those last two things sound great to a wildly black-and-white libertarian base but anyone else sees them as sounding great to some in theory but aweful in practice.
_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.