ruveyn wrote:
How it came about is addressed by a number of theories including the Lamarkian theory of use and disuse and the Darwinian theory (its latest version) based on genetic variation and natural selection.
Darwin also accepted the idea of use and disuse; that was not a specifically Lamarckian idea. And he had no knowledge of genetics. The distinction between Darwin and Lamarck was that Darwin had the idea of natural selection, while Lamarck upheld a concept of progressive development (things naturally tend to get more complex).
scorpileo wrote:
well its not a fact.. yes its plausable to some extent but it should never be taken at face value.
i have nothing against the theory but I dont like how poeple try to use it to disprove God as it doesnt
i also dislike how people say science is the opisite of religion.. i say it is one.
Evolution actually is an observed fact- that is incontestable unless you simply deny the evidence. The mechanism by which it occurs is the theory. You are correct that it does not disprove God.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH