08 Jul 2010, 6:01 pm
08 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
08 Jul 2010, 6:20 pm
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
08 Jul 2010, 7:06 pm
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
08 Jul 2010, 9:36 pm
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
You complain about this all the time, and I still say f*** you. That being said, most of the questions are philosophical or sociological anyway, and thus don't require much of a scientific background at all. You just need to know the term "cryogenic" and have some vague idea of transferring knowledge from a brain to a computer.
08 Jul 2010, 10:59 pm
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
You complain about this all the time, and I still say f*** you. That being said, most of the questions are philosophical or sociological anyway, and thus don't require much of a scientific background at all. You just need to know the term "cryogenic" and have some vague idea of transferring knowledge from a brain to a computer.
A powerful and intelligent response, "Fuckyou". If that is the level of your discussion it seems my original contention is right on target.
08 Jul 2010, 11:15 pm
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
You complain about this all the time, and I still say f*** you. That being said, most of the questions are philosophical or sociological anyway, and thus don't require much of a scientific background at all. You just need to know the term "cryogenic" and have some vague idea of transferring knowledge from a brain to a computer.
A powerful and intelligent response, "f****". If that is the level of your discussion it seems my original contention is right on target.
Actualy, "f***" is totally appropriate when dealing with you. Not only that, but I clearly used a 4 letter word.
08 Jul 2010, 11:34 pm
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
You complain about this all the time, and I still say f*** you. That being said, most of the questions are philosophical or sociological anyway, and thus don't require much of a scientific background at all. You just need to know the term "cryogenic" and have some vague idea of transferring knowledge from a brain to a computer.
A powerful and intelligent response, "f****". If that is the level of your discussion it seems my original contention is right on target.
Actualy, "f***" is totally appropriate when dealing with you. Not only that, but I clearly used a 4 letter word.
Don't blame me for incompetent censorship. Your vitriolic emotional response quite satisfactorily demonstrates I've struck home.
08 Jul 2010, 11:49 pm
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
You complain about this all the time, and I still say f*** you. That being said, most of the questions are philosophical or sociological anyway, and thus don't require much of a scientific background at all. You just need to know the term "cryogenic" and have some vague idea of transferring knowledge from a brain to a computer.
A powerful and intelligent response, "f****". If that is the level of your discussion it seems my original contention is right on target.
Actualy, "f***" is totally appropriate when dealing with you. Not only that, but I clearly used a 4 letter word.
Don't blame me for incompetent censorship. Your vitriolic emotional response quite satisfactorily demonstrates I've struck home.
No, it proves that you are an annoying f***. Let's put it this way, if a mosquito bites once, it's annoying. If it bites twice, you start getting mad. If you get bitten any time you go out, then the mosquitoes are annoying f***s.
08 Jul 2010, 11:59 pm
09 Jul 2010, 12:03 am
Sand wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Does the copy of information from the brain to other source has to do with Ray Kurzweil's futuristic AI ideas or is this a different scenario?
It has as much to do with Kurzweil as you want it to.
It is unlikely that anyone at this site has the scientific background or experimental experience to offer a sensible reply. It is quite easy here to gather meaningless chatter by total ignoramuses if that is your goal.
It is likely, however, that there are people here who are futurists who read articles that contain information from experiments done by people with the required scientific backgrounds.
New Scientist, TED, Physorg, H+ Magazine. There's plenty of science to be learned and digested in a format for lay people.
09 Jul 2010, 12:04 am
09 Jul 2010, 12:17 am
09 Jul 2010, 12:36 am
09 Jul 2010, 12:52 am
Sand wrote:
Although cryogenics has been slightly successful in suspended animation and other means such as the use of hydrogen sulfide looks interesting it is a subject that responds to experimentation and kicking the BS around is not an effective approach.
see:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/10/0 ... index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspended_animation
see:
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/10/0 ... index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suspended_animation
You gave me the keyword to find the video I was thinking of. Thanks!!
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/mark_ ... ation.html
Last edited by skafather84 on 09 Jul 2010, 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
09 Jul 2010, 12:52 am
